QuickTopic logo Create New TopicNew Topic My TopicsMy Topics News
Skip to Messages


National Reassessment - NRP

Welcome to Postal Employee Network Discussions!
Please Visit Our Homepage
^     All messages            6644-6663 of 6663  6624-6643 >>
Donny JacksonPerson was signed in when posted
09:40 AM ET (US)
I wasn't attacking any members for posting just mad how the postal service are doing what they want while stand by begging for pennies I hope they get shut down and privatized I despise the postal service for all the evil wicked deeds they committed against employees and destroy lives .
SfinjuredPerson was signed in when posted
11:10 AM ET (US)
Actually Donny I just copied and pasted the info from their site🙄
Edited 08-13-2016 11:10 AM
Donny JacksonPerson was signed in when posted
02:06 AM ET (US)
All this energy typing asking questions you all should be lobbying to get sanctions against this bogus court system THAT cater to the postal service.
Donny JacksonPerson was signed in when posted
02:02 AM ET (US)
This all bull postal workers have no power the postal service are evil entity backed by the government.and there is no class members filing appeals it's the court helping postal service delay the claimants.
TommiPerson was signed in when posted
08:31 PM ET (US)
#6658. This is the same thing it's been saying. Not a change. Just a wait for our measley lil bit of $$
SfinjuredPerson was signed in when posted
01:04 AM ET (US)
Status Update

As of August 9, 2016, the status of the case has changed. One class member filed a complaint in federal court. The District Court of Colorado issued an order on April 11, 2016, dismissing the class member’s complaint. The class member filed an appeal to this dismissal. USPS continues to take the position that based on the terms of the settlement agreement this complaint challenges the settlement agreement and the distribution process must be stayed until this dismissal is final. Continue to visit the website for status updates. (www.pittmanclass.com)
😡😡😡😡 So frustrating
fecaadvocatePerson was signed in when posted
02:09 AM ET (US)
if this site does not work this may be worth trying

Dear First lady and President Obama .I hope that you can correct a civil violation that has continued and been repeated since the 1990s
to the present In 2010 the agency had been sent an affirmation of the disability act by your husband who had been in charge of this federal department and this agency began the process of removing or limiting hours of employment using practices involving discrimination of employee's with a handicapped . I was aware that your father and the president father in law had a handicap; and your father, like most of us in federal service had to find our own way to do our work though are ability to think outside the box to find our own reasonable accommodations to preform the essential elements of our jobs. I am sure your father was stressed as were the one hundred and thirty thousand disabled employee were also stressed ,who were financial destroyed, and morally devastated affecting all of their family In my agency these employee's had their personnel files reviewed and then were told that they had no work available for them or gave them three hours a day work so they would not have to pay unemployment cost . Prior to the agency reviewing their files ;allowed these employed to work 8 to 12 hours a day for 5 to 6 days a week. After they got rid of the people who were labeled kips, rehabs cripples and other names. It is hard to imagine these employees who were up to forty years of service and had several commendations letters and veterans would be removed because no work was available . There was work available because the union had filed and receive multi million dollars settlements because the work that the handicapped employee's had done was being done in violation by employees not authorized in the contract. Unfortunately none of this money went to the handicapped worker that were doing this work after their apparently fraudulent removal of no work available, The agency of the USPS has violated your husbands letters and policy and the federal laws concerning handicap discrimination . Please look at the settlement caused by these action and cost of these action. The USPS to-date has created, The NRP Class action finding of discrimination estimate in their Q-10 which shows a Billion dollars,The Pittman settlement claim 12.7 million and the first violation was Glover vs USPS which was 61 million dollars. I pray that the lord inspires you to help these people that have lost everything, life. family, dignity and hope!
Edited 07-28-2016 02:08 PM
TommiPerson was signed in when posted
10:10 PM ET (US)
Bulldog#6652, your answer was long and full of information. Thank you so much for sharing. I thank all for any and all info shared. We all need to help each other and I sure appreciate all I hear. I also take heed on many things. Thanks again and God bless
NC520Person was signed in when posted
09:05 PM ET (US)
BULLDOG #6652, Thanks for posting this information.
BULLDOGPerson was signed in when posted
05:52 PM ET (US)
Tommi OPM has the rates from 2013-2016 which are listed on line. At one time they archived all of the benefit charges for each year, but just recently they only provided the information for 4 years. I was able to glean the information for 2011 by comparing my pay stub, before they sent me home on NWA as a result of NRP, and my benefit statements after I was put on the 28 day cycle by OWCP. I have all of the postal employee and non-postal employee rates for 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015 (self & family) and 2016 (self + one). If you had self & family coverage I can tell you the rates for every year except 2012, but I'm hoping to get that information next week after I make a few more phone calls. This was for Blue Cross/Blue Shield Basic Option, but it is true for all insurance options. If you have your Benefit Service Plan book from the insurance carrier you chose during Open Season check the breakdown of rates, and if you don't have your Service Book call FEHB and see if they can get you one. BC/BS can be found on the back page listing the type of enrollment, non-postal premiums (biweekly & monthly) showing your share and the government's share. The next column postal premiums, that means that you are still considered a postal employee on the USPS roles. Biweekly premiums are shown, but there are two categories. Category 1 is for postal employees who are listed as postal employees, even if they are on OWCP. Category 2 is for postal employees who are retired, in other branches of the Federal Government and non-bargaining unit employees. This premium rate is the same as non-postal biweekly rate. The difference between Category 1 (biweekly $135.14) and Category 2 (biweekly $160.75) is $25.61, which is what you are being overcharged. If you are on a 28 day cycle that would be twice that amount ($25.61 x 2= $51.22) you should be getting reimbursed by the Postal service every 28 days for those who qualify.

I can also provide the rates for all enrollment options for BS/BS for 2016.

To qualify you must have been receiving OWCP for X number of hours which equal a year. Call your OWCP case worker to check on this if you aren't certain. If you've been on OWCP since 2010 I believe you'll qualify. See if you can get a letter from them stating your are still an postal employee.
Make certain you are still considered a postal employee and are listed as such on their roles even if you are only receiving a pay stub.
Call HRMSS, Human Resource Management Shared Services, and make certain you are still considered a Postal Employee, and again see if you can get them to write a letter to that effect.

After you get all of your ducks in a row and are certain you qualify, call Northern Ohio District Health and Resource Management, or write to your Senator. In my case he wrote to the Government Liaison Manager who is the go between with the Postal Service.

Sorry this is so long, but I hope it was of some help. I had to do a lot of digging on my own. If I can help in any other way let me know. GOD BLESS!
Edited 07-28-2016 04:38 PM
TommiPerson was signed in when posted
02:16 PM ET (US)
Bulldog #6649, how do you know the correct amount for medical?
MetooPerson was signed in when posted
05:44 AM ET (US)
thanks, but this was over 10 years ago and way before I became knowledgeable about the ways of the PO and OWCP....
BULLDOGPerson was signed in when posted
09:55 PM ET (US)
Metoo Contact your State Senators and your Congressman explaining your problem. I sent the same letter to all of them and have had good results from my Senators. They sent a copy of my letters to OWCP and the PO and they both jumped. An OWCP decision was reversed and the PO is going to reimburse me for OWCP taking too much out for my medical benefits since 2011. Some of our government officials aren't that great at their job, but remember it is an election year and they want your vote. What have you got to lose?
VWPerson was signed in when posted
08:20 PM ET (US)
I would not stop at filing a grievance with your union. You need to write a letter to OWCP stating that the nurse illegally inserted herself into your claim causing you to lose your doctor. I would also get the name of the nurse and file a complaint with your state nursing board as there could also be violations of the other laws, i.e. HIPPA, Privacy Act.
Edited 07-15-2016 08:21 PM
MetooPerson was signed in when posted
05:20 PM ET (US)
VW..HRM contacted/harassed my dr by phone and yes they are not suppose to but they did and I lost a great dr because of it.. And what happened??? Union filed a grievance and HRM got a slap on the hand....
VWPerson was signed in when posted
02:28 PM ET (US)
I was scrolling through posts as I do from time to time and saw something you wrote that caught my eye. You stated that the POSTAL NURSE contacted your doctor. Do you have proof of this? How was the contact made, was it in writing or over the phone? When did the contact happen? Representatives from your employing agency are not allowed to contact your treating physician except to inquire about your ability to return to work. This request can be satisfied by submitting a CA-17 from your doctor. At no time are they permitted to contact your doctor by phone and when they contact your doctor in writing a copy of the request must also be sent to you.
Edited 07-15-2016 02:32 PM
MetooPerson was signed in when posted
07:28 AM ET (US)
Just wanted to let everyone know that I talked with SS this morning and Snowed is right, the girl said my pension wouldn't be offset as on fers you pay ss....
MetooPerson was signed in when posted
05:17 AM ET (US)
BULLDOG and Chatty Kat...Thank you for the advice and I will follow thru with this, you have given me a lot to think about..

Snowed... thanks, that is a relief... I will follow up will all this for my ease of mind...
SnowedPerson was signed in when posted
10:42 PM ET (US)
you should not have any offset with fers retirement and regular SS.
^     All messages            6644-6663 of 6663  6624-6643 >>