QuickTopic logo Create New TopicNew Topic My TopicsMy Topics News
 
Skip to Messages

TOPIC:

Postal Clerks

^     All messages            6426-6441 of 6441  6410-6425 >>
6441
herber
07-29-2016
11:45 AM ET (US)
I haven't been on these message boards in months.
192.168.l.l
6440
Deleted by author 07-29-2016 02:05 PM
6439
postalvetPerson was signed in when posted
07-15-2016
10:01 AM ET (US)
/m6438 yes it is a grievance. one for working the pse over 360 days and one for the overtime list to be paid all hours the pse worked over 360 days.
6438
TJ
07-14-2016
11:51 PM ET (US)
Our PSE's are working past 360 days without a 5 day break in service. Is this a grievance and if so, what is the violation and should the remedy be??? Thanks!
Edited 07-14-2016 11:52 PM
6437
kim2Person was signed in when posted
07-08-2016
11:23 AM ET (US)
thks
6436
X-stewPerson was signed in when posted
07-07-2016
07:26 PM ET (US)
/m6435 Good info, great reference.

/m6434 PTF have no bidding seniority till they make regular. They are entitled to use the time in their office to determine who picks when for prime-time vacations.

Inside the bldg, even regulars don't have seniority to be able to pick assignments like unloading trucks or working the window.
6435
SouthernClerkPerson was signed in when posted
07-07-2016
06:28 PM ET (US)
/m6434 This might help:
http://triapwu.org/training/ptfqa.php
6434
kim2Person was signed in when posted
07-07-2016
04:25 PM ET (US)
do ptf's have seniority? do ptf's have to travel if there is a floater assigned to the office.
6433
Pittbull
06-10-2016
08:52 AM ET (US)
Sometimes?! LMAO!!!
6432
X-stewPerson was signed in when posted
06-10-2016
08:05 AM ET (US)
Don't let trolls push you away; it's happened to all of us. Mostly we notice the lack of 'star' and ignore those posts. But sometimes I err.

Do find a professional you can talk to if you want. Someone whose only priority is you, not PO.
6431
Joan LandisPerson was signed in when posted
06-10-2016
07:07 AM ET (US)
To: X-stew and pittbull,

I thank you so much for your responses to my situation. I have not ruled out EAP, however, I am reminded of a situation a few years ago where an employee's medical information was leaked and the only person they confided in was a EAP rep. This may not happen to me, but I admit I am a bit skeptical.

This will definitely be my last post. There was a huge impropriety committed here. Someone used my name to post a message. The incident was definitely reported to the QuickTopic staff. I will not be returning to this forum because of this dishonesty.

I sincerely appreciate the help from the folks who treated me with "dignity and respect." You guys take care.
6430
Joan LandisPerson was signed in when posted
06-10-2016
06:51 AM ET (US)
Someone was able to create the following message under my name:

"Joan Landis
06-09-2016
10:41 AM ET (US)
The only deadbeats on here are you and X-stew. Wasted lives!"

I never ever called anybody a "deadbeat" in this forum. The above post was not submitted by me at all. How in the world was this possible to do?

This was my reply to postalvet, which, was the last post that I made to this forum:

Postalvet's reply to me:

"QT|
/m6409 WOW!!!
I direct you to question 3!!
https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/faq.aspx

I am the nicest guy I know, but when people do not understand something and I constantly have to repeat myself I get a little irritated.

look in the mirror and ask yourself, why hasn't anyone else come here to help me."

TO WHICH I REPLIED:

"QT|
TO: Postalvet

I read question 3 and nothing about that paragraph pertains to my life - AT ALL. It actually does pertain more to you. Go back and read your post. 7 and 15.... Really....?

On the contrary, there were other people with various responses to my post(s). So, I did look in the mirror and liked what I saw. I'm good to go!

Have a nice day - Grumpy! LOL"

So, it is my assumption that postalvet did not like my reply.......
6429
Pittbull
06-09-2016
06:49 PM ET (US)
On second thought I am not sure if 6145 was my only entry or not. Better go talk to the shrink again.
6428
Pittbull
06-09-2016
06:40 PM ET (US)
If this issue has the gal in tears and crying, EAP is for sure going to help. How could you even make such a silly statement? Sounds like you are just more pissed off than trying to resolve this. (my 3rd entry) and I will register if I ever make a post on here again.
6427
Pittbull
06-09-2016
06:32 PM ET (US)
6415 was my only entry. I am done here, as there are more people trying to spin stuff up than to solve the problem. I was always told by EAP that it is confidential. The only time it is not confidental is if you threaten bodily harm or death to some folks. Even the shrink told me that.
6426
Pittbull
06-09-2016
06:17 PM ET (US)
Going to EAP is much better than coming on here for help from people like you and X-stew. Misinformed also gave good advice in /m6418
^     All messages            6426-6441 of 6441  6410-6425 >>

Print | RSS Views: 314528 (Unique: 50156 ) / Subscribers: 43 | What's this?