QuickTopic free message boards logo
Skip to Messages


Postal EEO Forum

^               13393-13408 of 13408  13377-13392 >>
RivkahPerson was signed in when posted
02:11 PM ET (US)
Whoever you are you are so off base it's ridiculous. You obviously want no part of truth or logic.
01:18 PM ET (US)
PEA... NO. Jazzie01 and I are not the same. I stand on the side of whats true, real and fair. While I don’t agree with some of jazzie01 post , rivkah is not much different. An opinion is like an as$&@ everyone has one and jazzie01 is no exception - good, bad or indifferent. Jazzie01 could be unknowingly suffering with mental issues and Rivkah the supposedly Christian, Muslim or whatever faith she proclaims shows her no mercy. I usually don’t comment on post not related to NRP, but I got really sick of Rivkah pouncing on and critiquing jazzie’s every statement all in the name of Jesus! Alah! Or whomever or whatever she worships. So, yes that’s my story I’m sticking to it. I apologize for any dissensions my opinion may have caused. RIVKAH YOU ARE A GOSSIPY BUSY BODY STOP IT! ...now how does it feel to have someone in cyberspace calling you out each time you erred. Again, get that telephone pole out of your eye that you may see clearly enough to get the speck out of your sister’s eye.
10:12 AM ET (US)

Thinking you may very well be right about this....


I concur
Edited 02-23-2019 10:14 AM
RivkahPerson was signed in when posted
09:21 AM ET (US)
PEA Thank you. I also had been thinking that Jazzie and Verlei are the same person.
Postal Employee Advocate
08:54 AM ET (US)
Wow! What a completely disjointed and virtue signaling post. I’m not quite sure how Rivhah’s comment about Jazzie’s post on the “Injured on Duty” discussion forum (directly under the EEO link, so it would be easy to inadvertently click on it) was in any way inappropriately interjecting herself into the conversation. It doesn’t matter if Jazzie mentioned Rivkah or not, the post (as usual) is providing misinformation. This has happened so many times that Jazzie has had to be corrected, disappears for a while, then comes back with more misinformation. You can be removed and banned from PEN for pretextual reasons, but spreading mis-information is okay. As for responding “publicly”, that’s what we do here. NONE of these posts are private, and once posted, they’re available in perpetuity. Even if deleted later, they are often copied and downloaded for future reference.
Quoting the Quran, or the Bible or the Torah or whatever religious text you proscribe to, is neither persuasive or convincing. None of those have anything to do with EEO, NRP or other litigation, and have nothing to do with governing conduct on these discussion forums. It seems highly likely that Verlei and Jazzie are one and the same, as their writing styles are very similar, as well as the feigned indignation expressed by both of them.
Rivkah, as well as anyone else, should respond whenever false or misleading information is disseminated on these information boards. And since these efforts to spread misinformation keeps recurring (mostly from the same individual), we should all assume that we have a saboteur lurking on these discussion forums.
VerleiPerson was signed in when posted
04:08 AM ET (US)
RIVKAH... you are in DENIAL. How dare you interject yourself.. did jazzie01 mention your name NO! You are gossiping and spreading strife. You claim you “accidentally” clicked on the injured forum... and then what began to read enough gossip to bring to this forum and start posting about it? Really!? If PEA is your friend, mentor etc you would not fuel the fire publicly. If you felt compelled to defend or inform you should have done so privately. Maybe you can find the error of your ways here: 104b. Al Quran surah 104. The wicked love to gossip.
Edited 02-23-2019 04:45 AM
08:39 PM ET (US)
I agree, rivkah.
RivkahPerson was signed in when posted
08:31 PM ET (US)
/m13399 I am directly involved. That is not gossip. This same person has spread lies about me and attacked me and others on these forums. They are once again giving false information about someone I respect and trust. He is my advocate. I consider him my mentor and friend as others on here do. They are accusing him of doing things that are illegal. Jesus made a whip and chased the hypocrites out of the Temple. I cannot remain silent when someone continually spreads false information and attacks those who have done nothing wrong.
05:37 PM ET (US)
I think it is a full 🌒
Edited 02-22-2019 05:38 PM
VerleiPerson was signed in when posted
05:29 PM ET (US)
m/13397....How can you see the speck in your brother's eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. Stop gossiping and spreading strife!
10:22 AM ET (US)
Your material is very appealing.

Feel free to surf to my web site
RivkahPerson was signed in when posted
08:06 AM ET (US)
PEA I just clicked on the injured forum on here by accident. There is a post from Jazzie about you. Honestly, she is sooo full of herself and way out of line. No wonder she posted on a thread that is nothing but scammers.
RivkahPerson was signed in when posted
07:57 AM ET (US)
More will be known when the AJ responds to the Motions that are currently being submitted by the po and all interested parties and the March 20 Status Conference is held.
Monek JohnsonPerson was signed in when posted
07:02 AM ET (US)
I have a question how many more steps before we have exhausted the entire process before we get paid and how long can it take maybe 10 years to win the case and 10 years to get paid just asking what about reinstatement? To end further loss of income to members and lesson the back pay that is adding up? Does that make sense
Postal Employee Advocate
04:37 PM ET (US)
My comment regarding rejection of the speculation of the eventual costs a complainant would pay in the event a non-attorney was involved, was directed at the proposed scenario, and I explained why.
My comment regarding my bona fides was directed at a poster on the other side who has been exposing his/her profound ignorance by claiming that non-attorney representatives must be licensed. I must not have made that clear in my earlier comment.
Former USPS InspectorPerson was signed in when posted
03:49 PM ET (US)
@Postal Employee Advocate, you "categorically reject the scenario just presented". So when you say "I get 1/3rd of any non-pecuniary compensatory damages, or emotional damages awarded to the complainant" does that persist by your "contract" through both a settlement or trail award/appeal paid out to the victim employee at/in the Federal District court process? If it does then my scenario does categorically represent you. I have NEVER and will not accuse you of "mis-handling the processing of a complaint" or "challenge my representation of a federal or Postal employee" until I have verified proof of which I do not and have no desire to attempt to confirm even had there been a credible allegation of such. In the event you feel I am the poster in "I suppose the poster who is challenging my credentials knows more than these other legal professionals" then I assure you I lack any knowledge of instances to support nor am I challenging your "credentials" issues. I am not aware that any non-attorney advocates/representatives requires a "credential" or competency test requirement to provide services outside specific DBAs in States the person works with regards to local/state rules (like tattoo artists, message therapists ect).

My suggestion is that victim employees think long and hard about the cost/benefit to proceeding with their EEOC case/claim in relation to using an attorney and/or non attorney. If a victim has a high loss value case/claim AND strongly believes there is enough proof to support the case/claim then pulling out TSP or home equity to afford a high dollar lawyer under the presumption/expectation their case/claim will proceed to a Federal District court trial/appeal is likely a wise choice in the long run to hire the attorney. If the victim can't afford a attorney and does not wish to represent themselves then a cheaper/reliable/communicable non attorney is their only option, so be it.

If a victim is facing getting only 20-40% of their award/settlement at the Federal District level then likely the emotional costs with the Federal/State tax responsibility assessed is not worth proceeding past the OFO reconsideration step.
^               13393-13408 of 13408  13377-13392 >>