QuickTopic free message boards logo
Skip to Messages

TOPIC:

Jan 23 - 1142 != 9622?

6
ColdChef
01-28-2002
01:42 PM ET (US)
..and I had such high hopes for 11629, too.

I...killed it, Captain. The blood is on my hands, and mine alone. I'm so so sorry.
5
jedlin
01-24-2002
03:49 AM ET (US)
The first rule of 9622 is *smack*
4
kafkaesque
01-23-2002
08:32 PM ET (US)
It's reminiscent of that old Hendrix ditty: "If 1142 was 9622". If, of course, 9622 existed, which it obviously does not. And I am at pains to say that even if it did (which it doesn't) I would not be at liberty to discuss its existence (or non-existence)... Mr. Senator.
3
stavrosthewonderchickenPerson was signed in when posted
01-23-2002
09:47 AM ET (US)
..and I had such high hopes for 11629, too.
2
jedlin
01-23-2002
06:00 AM ET (US)
if perhaps a bit MeFi obscure.
You know, maybe a little. *delves into ancient tomes* I got nothin'.
1
stavrosthewonderchickenPerson was signed in when posted
01-23-2002
04:33 AM ET (US)
Original post here.

Print | RSS Views: 694 (Unique: 456 ) / Subscribers: 0 | What's this?