QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Mitnick may lose ham radio license
Views: 397, Unique: 350 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            1-3 of 3        
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Jay MaynardPerson was signed in when posted  1
06-19-2002 06:20 PM ET (US)
Despite the blurb on boingboing.net, Mitnick is not the first to have an application for renewal of a ham ticket denied. Herb Schoenbohm, ex-KV4FZ, had his application for renewal denied in 1992 after being convicted of felony telephone toll fraud. A Google search on KV4FZ will bring up several links with the information on the case; a good overview is at http://www2.arrl.org/w1aw/1998-arlb084.html .
Tanner LovelacePerson was signed in when posted  2
06-20-2002 12:55 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 06-20-2002 12:56 AM
It seems to me the difference here is that Schoenbohm "misrepresented" his felony conviction to the FCC and actively "solicited others, using Amateur Radio, to make ex parte presentations on his behalf, in violation of FCC rules." The ARRL website also makes the statement that "The FCC said his behavior, in combination with his fraud conviction, justified nonrenewal of his ham ticket." (emphasis added). In this particular case, I haven't seen anyone accuse Kevin Mitnick of any of that. On the contrary, it seems he has been fairly forthright about his conviction, which has nothing to do with ham radio.
Jay MaynardPerson was signed in when posted  3
06-20-2002 09:36 AM ET (US)
Schoenbohm's conviction didn't have anything to do with ham radio either. Both his and Mitnick's, though, were related to illegal use of telecommunications facilities. Since that's the FCC's area of jurisdiction, it does make some sense. The FCC's policy for many years has been to revoke all licenses, in all services, held by someone whose conduct justifies revocation of any of them; the actions in these cases seems consistent to me.
RSS link What's this?
All messages            1-3 of 3        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.