QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Google's trademark counsel behaving stupidly
Views: 2234, Unique: 1136 
Subscribers: 3
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 35-42  34-34 of 42  18-33 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Glenn FleishmanPerson was signed in when posted  34
02-26-2003 09:22 PM ET (US)
If you want to exclusively use a word, you make one up and trademark it. If you want it to continue to be yours to use exclusively, you enforce that trademark. If you don't want to be a dickhead, you approach the issue well: ask nicely to fulfill your legal requirement; only sue if it's someone trying to distort what you're doing or make money off the word. Google seems within all these parameters.

I specifically chose an untrademarkable term when I launched my Web development company in 1994: Point of Presence Company. It was in common parlance in the field, so I was free to use it, and someone couldn't name their company confusingly like mine even without trademark enforcement. But I didn't have to name it something stupid or suffer trademark suits from other people.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 35-42  34-34 of 42  18-33 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.