QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Moot court on property versus commons for spectrum allocation
Views: 245, Unique: 203 
Subscribers: 3
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
keithofrpiPerson was signed in when posted  12
03-04-2003 09:20 PM ET (US)
The moot court was a very interesting post, and I'm surprised you haven't gotten any substantive comments about it yet. Anyway, here's mine. The difficulty with calling something "property" is that it's inflexible; it defines a certain thing, space, practice, or whatever as mine, to the world's exclusion. And in spectrum this would be very inefficient, as Lessig says. But the alternative to property is not necessarily a commons. My right NOT to be physically assaulted is not usually seen as a property right--my body as my property--but as part of a bundle of rights that humanity, and citizenship, confer. A bundle of rights gets labeled "property" when it passes certain tests, but it can be useful even far short of that label. So who should define that bundle? Obviously not the FCC, for reasons stated. But we do have a very fine instrument at hand: the common law, which would define the necessary bundle of rights in pragmatic ways that could evolve over time as necessity requires.
Cory DoctorowPerson was signed in when posted  11
03-03-2003 05:38 PM ET (US)
What Chris Said. I post every single interesting thing that *I* want to keep track of, in as much depth as *I* want to post about, right here.

Since you may not want to read everything that's on my mind, use any of the tools available to filter Boing Boing. You could, for example, get Boing Boing by email and filter it. You could use RSS and filter it.

Asking me -- who posts this for *my own* benefit -- to change what or how I post is a non-starter. I'm delighted if you find the things I post interesting, but if you don't, that's Not My Problem -- it's yours.

An apropos quote from a party last night: "Let me introduce you to my dear friend, Mr. Scrollbar."
Chris SmithPerson was signed in when posted  10
03-03-2003 03:23 PM ET (US)
At the risk of overstepping the extension of the ideas in the moot court - if you don't like bb the way it is, couldn't you just:

a) Configure an RSS reader to give you the "more" feature.

b) Wrap the RSS reader in a site, call it bbrepeats, and you
have bb with 'more links'.

Look at it this way - it's YOUR problem - you solve it.
erniePerson was signed in when posted  9
03-03-2003 12:09 PM ET (US)
Scroll-Boing! :)
Q-B the Magic TablePerson was signed in when posted  8
03-03-2003 12:57 AM ET (US)
Cory, your anxious post has already answered that question.
Cory DoctorowPerson was signed in when posted  7
03-02-2003 10:40 PM ET (US)
Welcome to my dictatorship, where I get to post exactly what I want to post, however I want to post it -- even if it bums you out by making you scroll a little.

Hey, QB, ask me if I care whether you are "sick of this shit," given that I don't owe you a single solitary thing, and given that you have just been fantastically rude to me. Go ahead, ask me!
Q-B the Magic TablePerson was signed in when posted  6
03-02-2003 10:28 PM ET (US)
Yuck, the agenda is getting overbearing. Sick of this shit.
spincyclePerson was signed in when posted  5
03-02-2003 11:56 AM ET (US)
That would *REALLY* have been better as a link to the text.
RupertSPerson was signed in when posted  4
03-02-2003 05:56 AM ET (US)
BoingBoing desperately needs a 'Read More' link on articles over a certain line count. All this liveblogging is breaking my finely honed, high speed weblog post scanning routines...!
Snarfy BoopsnigglePerson was signed in when posted  3
03-01-2003 10:51 PM ET (US)
I would have loved to have sean it live - but the audio quality on the Real Video feed was so bad I couldn't listen to it. They had the levels set WAAAAY too high.

I REALLY hope this was a problem with the Real-video encoding and that the origonal audio files/tapes/disks are ok.

The other feeds were broken when I tried them.

<snif>

-Snarfy
NobodyPerson was signed in when posted  2
03-01-2003 09:16 PM ET (US)
I gave Lessig a plug in here just a few days back, but I'll do it again. http://aux.planetmath.org/freeculture/
CraniacPerson was signed in when posted  1
03-01-2003 09:15 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-01-2003 09:16 PM
Can't....breathe.....drowning in....liveblogging...aaaackkk...must retreat to metafilter...

Just kidding.

I got a sparkling new copy of "The Years Best Science Fiction" edited by Dozois for only a buck today at our local library book sale. They tossed everything that hadn't been checked out in a year.

I had to tell someone.
RSS link What's this?
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2006 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.