QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Fast-forwarding is not a crime!
Views: 222, Unique: 191 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            1-7 of 7        
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
MarkyPerson was signed in when posted  1
11-11-2002 04:09 PM ET (US)
Is this posted anywhere else? The LA Times sign-up is a royal PIA...
Heidi D. CrumplePerson was signed in when posted  2
11-11-2002 05:21 PM ET (US)
"Do you want Hollywood to dictate how you watch DVDs at home?" Please. They already dictate how we watch movies. Why is this even an issue?
William OConnorPerson was signed in when posted  3
11-11-2002 06:29 PM ET (US)
If you think about it, the director/producer/publisher give up control as soon as the consumer purchases the movie. It's been that way ever since the development of the VCR. I fail to see the distinction between something that enhances the viewing experience, such as a family friendly auto-fastforward, and the simple manual fast forward or stop button that's been on every VCR since they were created.
If the DGA gets their way in this, they would seemingly be within their rights to prevent anything that would interrupt or alter the flow of a movie. So, would the stop, pause and fast forward buttons on your VCR be outlawed? Would you be committing a crime if you rewound a movie before you reached the end? This sort of lawsuit needs to be laughed out of court.
jleaderPerson was signed in when posted  4
11-11-2002 06:42 PM ET (US)
What if you get up and walk out of the room (or the theater, for that matter) in the middle of the movie? Is the DGA going to require movie theaters to lock the doors when the feature starts? I mean, I know the job description includes "detail obsessed control freak", but really!
patrick breitenbachPerson was signed in when posted  5
11-11-2002 08:59 PM ET (US)
Just sign up already. Sheesh.
Heidi D. CrumplePerson was signed in when posted  6
11-11-2002 11:47 PM ET (US)
I sense some folks here are blowing things a wee bit out of proportion.

To the person who muttered something about a consumer owning something the minute they buy it ... oh, really? Guess who owns the copyright? And as copyright holder, the studio/director/whomever can do what they please. Sad fact, but it keeps people in work making money.

The only reason the DGA (and, on an unrelated matter, the RIAA) keeps getting their pantyhose in knots is because *people are stealing copyrighted material*. Of course they're going to bring out their big guns and shoot down any percieved copyright infringement! What do you want them to do? Lie down and lose money?
mrklawPerson was signed in when posted  7
11-12-2002 02:00 PM ET (US)
I thought copyright was supposed to protect copyright holders from having consumers redistribute or make money from the copyrighted works.

Does copyright law say you can't shred a book that you purchased or make a coaster out of a DVD? You should be able to do anything you want with it as long as you don't redistribute the copyrighted work.

The DGA is worried about more than stealing. They are getting worked up about people buying movies and then taking them to places like CleanFlicks to have portions edited out.
RSS link What's this?
All messages            1-7 of 7        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.