Very few of the things on there are new to me, but it seems
also that a lot is left out and important connections are
not made, while some odd connections are made, and some
things are misemphasized.
Consider: leather, rubber wear, latex, spandex (general tight
and/or wet look cloths) form a continuum, but they are
not grouped that way here. Lycra is oddly put near object
transformation. There is an overlap of the leather/rubber
end of that spectrum with bondage, and an overlap of bondage
with S&M. But bondage isn't here, just S&M. And medical
proceedures seem way to far from S&M. Transgenderization
(particularly feminization) is left out, it should be near
age play, and overlap a lot with embarassment (I would call
it humiliation) and a little bit with S&M and medical
proceedures. Bukake should be in humiliation. Giantesses
and Amazon women should be here, near feet, trampling, and
growth; unless that is what they are calling 'macrophiles'.
Body modifications are a bit scant, where are tattoos for
example? Sleeping women and drunk women are probably bigger
than this makes them out to be, and should have a connection
to dirty/clean embarassment (pants wetting). Public nudity
can have an embarassment aspect, but can also be bold,
daring exhibitionism which should have a link to voyuerism.
And I have to wonder where she gets her information concerning
gender and orientation preferences being associated with
some of these things.
Edit:
More things: mile high club; sex on boats or trains; underwater
sex; public sex; group sex; swinging; teachers; why is Lolitas
in hurt/comfort? I really could go on and on.
Edited 09-23-2002 01:34 PM