QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Danger relaxes SDK terms, still getting it wrong
Views: 345, Unique: 269 
Subscribers: 2
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 4-11  3-3 of 11  1-2 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Cory DoctorowPerson was signed in when posted  3
03-21-2003 01:57 PM ET (US)
(Point of fact: the vast majority of phones are sold at or below cost with a service agreement)

I bought my Danger -- at full retail -- because I had seen a presentation from a Danger exec where he promised easy and open development for the platform.

If the objective of limiting the SDK is to keep the network overheads low, then throttling connectivity to unsigned apps would accomplish this end -- without restricting the ability of developers to build me apps that improve the functionality of the device (i.e., an iSync conduit that would make the device actually useful as a PIM, or a proper notepad that accomodated more than 20 notes, or a mailer with filtering rules, or a browser with find-in-page).

This is a device that is neither an end-to-end Internet box nor a phone, but rather an increasingly tragic half-man/half-beast with the worst characteristics of both.

It's really depressing, because this is the most promising device I've seen in years. My only hope is that criticism from actual Danger customers will sway the company into doing the right thing before it's too late.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 4-11  3-3 of 11  1-2 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.