QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: War-blogging worth reading
Views: 474, Unique: 267 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 21-34  20-20 of 34  4-19 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
LoveGravyPerson was signed in when posted  20
03-21-2003 11:15 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-21-2003 11:19 PM
Just to make this perfectly clear:

My assertion is that WAR is the ONLY way to oust Saddam.

Your assertion must either be:

1. There's another way (if so let me hear it)
or
2. Saddam is fine where he is.


Let's leave Bush Sr. out of this. Let's also leave Clinton out of it since he did NOTHING to rectify the situation and he didn't go after Osama after he blew up barracks and bombed the Cole...

Which of the above assertions is yours?


Oh, and I think our promise to the Saudis was:

1. We wouldn't DIRECTLY go after Saddam personally(a promise to CONGRESS as much as to the Saudis, since assinations were outlawed under Johnson)
2. We wouldn't OCCUPY Iraq.

Other than that, Saudis were SCREAMING for us to move in because they, like us, felt that Saddam was planning a sharp right turn into Saudi Arabia, giving him the #1 and #2 largest oil wells which pump the money he DESPARATELY needed after his 10 years of war with Iran...
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 21-34  20-20 of 34  4-19 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.