QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: SBC's patent-shakedown: website navigation
Views: 2042, Unique: 1204 
Subscribers: 4
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 23-25  22-22 of 25  6-21 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
jleaderPerson was signed in when posted  22
01-20-2003 07:00 PM ET (US)
Interesting. The link on museumtour.com points to http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?...841&RS=PN/5,933,841
which is US Patent #5,933,841, filed May 17, 1996 and issued August 3, 1999.

Cypherpunks' link points to http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?...42574&RS=PN/6442574
which is US Patent #6,442,574, filed April 29, 1999 and issued August 28, 2002.

The abstracts are identical, but the details are different. The lists of references are almost identical, but #6,442,574 includes a reference to #5,933,841.

Then, under "Parent Case Text", #6,442,574 says:

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/649,271, filed May 17. 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 5,933,841, which application is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

Shortly after that point, I exceeded my capacity to read patent claims while engaging in sentience, but it sounds like May 17, 1996 may be the date to beat for prior art.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 23-25  22-22 of 25  6-21 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.