QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Howard Rheingold's Reboot talk
Views: 371, Unique: 277 
Subscribers: 3
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Cory DoctorowPerson was signed in when posted  8
06-04-2002 06:14 PM ET (US)
It's not a direct transcription -- speech (especially public speech) is highly redundant. Good speakers drive their point home several times in a given spiel. I just distilled out each little bit into one graf and typed it, using key phrases. But I do type 60wpm+.

Somewhere, there's a video-file of the talk I gave tonight, just before the awards-ceremony. It was a nice capstone to Howard's, and if I can dig out the link, I'll post it.
Stefan JonesPerson was signed in when posted  7
06-04-2002 03:50 PM ET (US)
Rheingold's larynx has a serial port connector (19,200 N81) that provides a near simultaneous speech-to-text stream.
Mark FrauenfelderPerson was signed in when posted  6
06-04-2002 02:01 PM ET (US)
This is great. How were you able to transcribe it so fast? Are you one of those speed typists?
Cory DoctorowPerson was signed in when posted  5
06-04-2002 01:26 PM ET (US)
Here's the permalink: http://boingboing.net/2002_06_01_archive.html#85140879

He wore a nice fire-engine-red sportscoat
DaveWPerson was signed in when posted  4
06-04-2002 01:19 PM ET (US)
Great talk. The kind of radical correction of "common knowledge" that needs much wider distribution.

Cory, will this be a sort of permanent link? I'd like to spread it around.
PaulHoffmanPerson was signed in when posted  3
06-04-2002 12:29 PM ET (US)
Nice review of his talk, but you didn't say what he wore. If Howard didn't wear one of his fabulously wild jackets, I'll be very disappointed.
davegroffPerson was signed in when posted  2
06-04-2002 10:41 AM ET (US)
I stumbled on this a couple of months ago, via another boingboing discussion:
http://faculty.washington.edu/wcalvin/LEM/

Its all about the early evolution of language - but relevant here is the discussion of altruism in human evolution. Mathematically, altruism doesn't work, long term, because cheaters eventually swamp the honest participants. BUT, during doughts or other hardship, hominids may have temporarily broken up into smaller groups, and those groups practicing altruism would have faired better. Language itself, according to these guys, could have been a necessary tool to police cheaters. Check it out.
Martin WissePerson was signed in when posted  1
06-04-2002 08:56 AM ET (US)
"The computer industry did not create the personal computer; it was created by people in their 20s who wanted a tool of their own. The Internet was created for the most part by people in their 20s, not the phone company. They didn't know what the tool was for, but they knew that other people would invent uses -- they built the Internet without a central control, to enable innovation."

This is not a new development.

Every single one of the big US industries, from fast food to oil and every single quintessal US artforms, from rock to comics to jazz to science fiction was started by young outsiders. In fact, I think it's possible to generalise this to every industry and every artform.
RSS link What's this?
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.