sucks? not

Can someone at SXSW put me in touch with the person David refers to here:

An audience member is complaining that QuickTopic sucks. (Quick, get me my broker!) QT is separate from the web site you're working on, has separate UI, etc.

I love to work with feedback to improve QT, but I need more context here. Thanks.

[Update: David responds in email (here by permission):

He meant that if I use QT to handle the discussions engendered by my site, I am sending my visitors to a site that doesn't have my brand or branding. Obviously this would be fixed if they paid you to create a QT site for them.

And people can get a customized QuickTopic like the one CIO Magazine uses. And customization will eventually be a self-serve feature in QT Pro. So I feel better.]

Discuss

March 10, 2003 01:47 PM