QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Input space vs. feature space in kernel-based methods
Views: 576, Unique: 422 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 10-15  9-9 of 15  1-8 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Gyozo Gidofavi  9
09-27-2001 12:32 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-27-2001 12:53 PM
This is a reply to the general question asked by Dave Kauchak about the number "n". As far as I know, as a general rule of thumb, if you want to cover X% of the variance in the data set, the selection of "n" can be as follows: select "n" such that:
(sum((i=1 to n) eigen-value(i)) / sum(all eigen-values)) = X/100. In other words select the first "n" eigen-vector components such that the normalized cumulative sum of the corresponding eigen-values is X/100, if X was a percentage. Normally X is usually 90% but this is can be really problem specific and in most cases is determined experimentally. Finally I’m not certain about whether larger number of eigen-vector components always give better results, in fact after a certain point to my understanding it can severely degrade performance.
Once again, let me repeat that the method for selection of "n" described above is a general rule of thumb.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 10-15  9-9 of 15  1-8 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.