QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Input space vs. feature space in kernel-based methods
Views: 583, Unique: 425 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 7-15  6-6 of 15  1-5 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Wu Junwen  6
09-27-2001 02:39 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-27-2001 02:51 AM
1. I think the most practical function of PCA is to do feature extract and dimention reduction, not noise reduction, while KPCA has a main advantage that it can capture the data structure easily, so that the noise that deviate the main structure can be percepted. So I don't think it is proper to compare the denoising result between linear PCA and KPCA. I am wondering how about the result if comparing the denoising experiment of kernel PCA and other classical denoising methods.

2. I think there is still some assumption about the data model: PCA can't deal with the uniform data. But practically, in real world, the data wouldn't be uniform. So that's why always we can adopt PCA without any concern.

3. If we only use the kernels that always have pre-image, then Gaussian kernel would be banned. A great loss!
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 7-15  6-6 of 15  1-5 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.