QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Empirical Evaluation of Dissimilarity Measures for Color and Texture
Views: 312, Unique: 224 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            6-6 of 6  1-5 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Markus Herrgard  6
10-30-2001 01:52 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-30-2001 01:56 PM
In principle one could penalize the likelihood in the EM algorithm by whatever seems to be reasonable considering the target application, but my understanding is that it is not anymore guaranteed that the EM algorithm will converge. This will of course depend on what exact kind of penalization one uses and how strong the contribution of the penalty term has. An example I have in mind is one where the likelihood is penalized by a Markov random field type term that forces EM to preferentially group neighboring pixels together. This type of penalization leads to problems with convegence if the penalty term is too large (i.e. the Gibbs field strength is too large).
RSS link What's this?
All messages            6-6 of 6  1-5 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.