There are 11 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Swami Vivekananda's doubts
From: Suresh Shenoy <sureshrshenoy@yahoo.com>
2. Vivekananda Mailing List-6/6/04
From: Ananta <sarada@global2000.net>
3. Re: Animals and Moksha.
From: kandaaran@aol.com
4. Re: SRK and other religions
From: kandaaran@aol.com
5. Re: Swami Vivekananda's doubts
From: Girish <girish_srv@yahoo.com>
6. Request..Re: SRK and other religions
From: srinivas.kondareddy@polaris.co.in
7. Re:SRK and other religions
From: "kalidas1957" <cintamani@lycos.co.uk>
8. Re: Swami Vivekananda's doubts
From: "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@btinternet.com>
9. Sri Ramakrishna and Islam
From: "somdev48858" <somdev48858@yahoo.com>
10. Re: Digest Number 1810
From: Edith Tipple <edtipple@earthlink.net>
11. Re: Source of new souls?
From: "hari_priya_rao" <hari_priya_rao@yahoo.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 10:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suresh Shenoy <sureshrshenoy@yahoo.com>
Subject: Swami Vivekananda's doubts
Swami Vivekananda's doubts
Swami Vivekananda (SV) is considered as an Incarnation of Shiva. The the book 'Sri Ramakrishna the Great Master' says he had the experience of Samadhi a number of times after he met Sri Ramakrishna (SRK), the first one by a mere touch of SRK.
Yet, we read that just before the Mahasamadhi of SRK, SV doubted if SRK was really an Incarnation as he claimed. The thought was read by SRK and he replied in the affirmative. Yet the fact is that: In spite of all his previous interaction with his Guru SRK and his own spiritual experiences which were of very high order, SV doubted SRK's divine origin. How this can be explained? If he himself, who proclaimed his Guru to the world as Incarnation, couldn't believe it, how others will be convinced?
The matter didn't stop there, in his days as a wandering monk, the Swami wanted intensely to become a disciple of Pavahari Baba, a lonely saint. A vision of the Guru (who had already left the world) prevented him from doing so. This becomes very hard to take when we consider the status of SRK / SV as Incarnations.
I welcome your views on these questions.
Sincerely,
Suresh
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 00:00:13 -0400
From: Ananta <sarada@global2000.net>
Subject: Vivekananda Mailing List-6/6/04
My Master used to say, "All is God; but tiger-God is to be shunned. All
water is water; but we avoid dirty water for drinking."
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:08:14 EDT
From: kandaaran@aol.com
Subject: Re: Animals and Moksha.
Dear Jagganath,
Thank you for the wonderful recollections and stories. I went to Sri Ramana
Maharshi's Ashram many years ago (over 30) and recall the sacred view of
animals. Gurudeva would say that these were old souls working on some specific
karma through an animal body instead of coming back to the planet at that time
as a human.
Om Namah Sivaya,
Love,
Kanda
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:59:21 EDT
From: kandaaran@aol.com
Subject: Re: SRK and other religions
Dear Suresh,
Once I flew out of India from New Delhi to Tehran and met some Mullahs that
explained their religion to us. One of the points they expressed was there is
one God and his name is Allah. From the Hindu view there is one God, the
creator of many souls and gods in His creation.
Personally my practice of Raja Yoga started in 1970 and the version of Raja
Yoga by Swami Vivekananda recommended by my Guru was Raja-Yoga copyright 1955,
by Swami Nikhilananda, Trustee of the Estate of Swami Vivekananda and was
printed in the United States of America. The revised edition that I have is dated
1973. I do not recall the statement about Mohammed. Personally I would
recommend that anyone practising Raja Yoga be initiated by a Guru, for me it was
very important in the early years of practice.
Om Namah Sivaya
Love,
Kanda
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Girish <girish_srv@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Swami Vivekananda's doubts
As an analogy (admittedly imperfect), consider Sri Rama's life - his sorrow when his wife was abducted, his worry and anger when his brother was felled by Indrajeet and his equanimity when told that he would not be crowned.
Here is an incarntion of Vishnu going through these human emotions. Why would we be surprised if Swami Vivekananda too went through these human emotions ? The fact that he went through what most of us go through serves as a guidepost to us. And it also showed that he "walked the talk" - did not accept anything without questioning at face value, but once he was convinced he never let go of his faith.
Others on the list would undoubtedly be able to have a better interpretation of these incidents.
Regards,
Girish
Suresh Shenoy <sureshrshenoy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Swami Vivekananda's doubts
Swami Vivekananda (SV) is considered as an Incarnation of Shiva. The the book 'Sri Ramakrishna the Great Master' says he had the experience of Samadhi a number of times after he met Sri Ramakrishna (SRK), the first one by a mere touch of SRK.
Yet, we read that just before the Mahasamadhi of SRK, SV doubted if SRK was really an Incarnation as he claimed. The thought was read by SRK and he replied in the affirmative. Yet the fact is that: In spite of all his previous interaction with his Guru SRK and his own spiritual experiences which were of very high order, SV doubted SRK's divine origin. How this can be explained? If he himself, who proclaimed his Guru to the world as Incarnation, couldn't believe it, how others will be convinced?
The matter didn't stop there, in his days as a wandering monk, the Swami wanted intensely to become a disciple of Pavahari Baba, a lonely saint. A vision of the Guru (who had already left the world) prevented him from doing so. This becomes very hard to take when we consider the status of SRK / SV as Incarnations.
I welcome your views on these questions.
Sincerely,
Suresh
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sri Ramakrishnaya Namah
Vivekananda Centre London
http://www.vivekananda.co.uk Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:08:57 +0530
From: srinivas.kondareddy@polaris.co.in
Subject: Request..Re: SRK and other religions
Hi Suresh,
Even though, i am not providing a correct answer to your question, i
request you to not to write in shorts about our Saints(for e.g. SRK, SV
etc).
regards
Srinivas
Suresh Shenoy
<sureshrshenoy@y To: Ramakrishna@yahoogroups.com
ahoo.com> cc: (bcc: srinivas.kondareddy/Polaris)
Subject: [Sri Ramakrishna] SRK and other religions
06/05/2004 09:20
PM
Please respond
to Ramakrishna
SRK's Experiences of all religions
In the SRK The Great Master, it is written that SRK practiced all major
religions and attained the goals of those religions and thus proved that
all religions lead to the same goal, that is God. Among the religions he
practiced, Islam is also there. He practiced it with the help of a Muslim
devotee. After some weeks or so, he saw the vision of Prophet Mohammed and
saw him entering his body (SRK's).
This seems quite straight-forward, but there are problems. When I read this
several years ago, I had little idea of the Muslim religion. Now I have
learnt about major aspects of that religion and I am reading the Quran. I
find that there are no spiritual practices that Islam approves / preaches.
It is mainly a way of life with "5 pillars" like prayers 5 times a day,
Zakat, Hajj, etc. There is no concept of meditation, etc. God is not
knowable and Prophet is just a human being who received messages from the
angel Gabriel represented by God Allah. There is no question of
God-realization or vision of Mohammed. So it is really puzzling how it can
be proved from SRK's experience that Islam leads to god realization. Islam
says you cannot see or hear God and you can know Him only after death in a
place called heaven where the life is fully material with heavenly maidens
called "hourries". As per the authentic majority religion called (Sunni)
Wahabi, one cannot become Muslim unless one
whole-heartedly accepts that Allah alone is the true God and Mohammed is
His only prophet. Without this, Muslim life doesn't even start. Hence the
experience of SRK seeing Prophet cannot be accepted as per Islamic
teaching. In that case, how this can be accepted as a proof of that
religion leading to God realization, when that religion itself denies
'God-realization' as false?
Secondly, in Raja Yoga, (Read in Vol 1 of Complete Works of SV, page 184)
SV says that Mohammed practiced Raja Yoga incorrectly, and as a result he
was a mentally deranged man. The result was misunderstood vision and a
religion which opened to superstition and bloodshed. Now, my question is:
how the above view that SRK's experience of Islam as a religion leading to
God and this SV's view of Mohammed match? If we take the view expressed by
SV, we can wonder if the religion founded by a mentally deranged man can
flourish and after 1350 years command 1 billion people in 57 countries? It
is officially a major religion and is said to be "the fastest growing
religion in the world".
I keep this question for a open discussion. This is not aimed to insult
Islam or Hinduism, but to seek an answer to a genuine question. I am
constantly studying the works of SV and SRK literature and have found some
discrepancies which needs answers. I will write more about such problems
slowly.
sincerely,
Suresh
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sri Ramakrishnaya Namah
Vivekananda Centre London
http://www.vivekananda.co.ukYahoo! Groups Links
----------
This e-Mail may contain proprietary and confidential information and is sent for the intended recipient(s) only.
If by an addressing or transmission error this mail has been misdirected to you, you are requested to delete this mail immediately.
You are also hereby notified that any use, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and/or publication of this e-mail message, contents or its attachment other than by its intended recipient/s is strictly prohibited.
Visit Us at
http://www.polaris.co.in[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:17:58 -0000
From: "kalidas1957" <cintamani@lycos.co.uk>
Subject: Re:SRK and other religions
I would like to say that insofar as orthodox Islam is concerned
there is, as you say, no method of spiritual awakening in the sense
of meditation etc, and no real concept of God realization. However,
within the Muslim Sufi tradititon such methods do exist, for
example the practice of 'Zikr', repitition of a simple prayer that
seems at least outwardly to bear some resemblance to Japa or Mantra
Yoga. Also other methods are employed such as quite complex dances
and so on.
Perhaps some other group members may have more information on this.
Hari Om.
Kalidas.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:53:47 +0100
From: "Vivekananda Centre" <vivekananda@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Swami Vivekananda's doubts
Dear Suresh
Further to your last three emails posted on the list.
We wish you well in establishing a Sri Ramakrishna devotee
group in Dubai. We hope that some of our list members who are
based in Dubai (or the Middle East) will contact you directly.
Further to the other two emails you have posted to the list:-
One on the question of 'Islam' and its validity and the other about
doubts Sw Vivekananda may have had about Sri Ramakrishna.
It is good to discuss such matters but we must advise caution
when coming to simplistic conclusions on such issues.
What form of Islamic experience Sri Ramakrishna had is not easy for us
to judge or explain. Nor are we in a position to evaluate the inner workings
of Swami Vivekananda's mind when he may have expressed doubts about
his master's God-head. "To understand a Vivekananda one has to be of
the same calibre as Vivekananda.'
regards
jay
jay
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:36:52 -0000
From: "somdev48858" <somdev48858@yahoo.com>
Subject: Sri Ramakrishna and Islam
This post is in reply to Suresh's previous post about Sri Ramakrishna
and Islam.
Sri Ramakrishna was introduced to Islam by Bengali Muslims who were
Sufis. Sufis are a mystical branch of Islam that incorporated quite a
bit of Hindu bhakti philosophy. I do not think that Sri Ramakrishna
was ever told about Sunni Wahabism. Until recently Wahabism did not
have much hold in the Islamic world. Petro-dollars changed all that.
As far as I remember from my reading, Sri Ramakrishna said that when
he was practicing Islam he did not have the urge to go to Kali
Temple. One day while meditating he saw the vision of a bearded man
who came towards him and entered his body. He assumed that it was
Mohammad. Muslims of course do not accept this because worshipping
any human form is sacrilegious to them. To Ramakrishna it meant that
Mohammad was also an avatar.
It is for the devotee to believe what he wants to. A Muslim devotee
will not accept Ramakrishna as a prophet. A true devotee of Sri
Ramakrishna will accept Mohammad as a prophet.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 14:38:33 -0700
From: Edith Tipple <edtipple@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1810
> Dear Suresh,
Your note is very interesting. Regarding the passage below, does it not sound Christian (except for the "hourries")? According to Christians, one cannot become Christian unless one accepts Jesus Christ as the only savior. Perhaps Fundamentalist Christians would not accept SRK's experience of Christ without his first being baptized. In other words, there is a difference between scriptural dogma and spiritual "conversion" or "realization". Perhaps that is what the problem is here.
Edith
> Islam says you cannot see or hear God and you can know Him only after death in a place called heaven where the life is fully material with heavenly maidens called "hourries". As per the authentic majority religion called (Sunni) Wahabi, one cannot become Muslim unless one
> whole-heartedly accepts that Allah alone is the true God and Mohammed is His only prophet. Without this, Muslim life doesn't even start. Hence the experience of SRK seeing Prophet cannot be accepted as per Islamic teaching. In that case, how this can be accepted as a proof of that religion leading to God realization, when that religion itself denies 'God-realization' as false?
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:06:28 -0000
From: "hari_priya_rao" <hari_priya_rao@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Source of new souls?
Hello Sheetal/Ashok,
Other than man, all animals merely do their "duties" without any
attachment or expectation, hence they proceed to better lives and
finally the human birth. They do not acquire any new karma, but are
merely exhausting all that they have accumulated. So they ultimately
reach the human life, from where they try to get liberated....
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Sri Ramakrishnaya Namah
Vivekananda Centre London
http://www.vivekananda.co.uk------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ramakrishna/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Ramakrishna-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------