I think the paper would be more useful with more time spent on the algorithmic details and explainations. It is not sufficient to use many unexplained terms and expect the readers to automatically understand them. The heavy use of acronyms also was difficult to parse. I did like the extensive experimentation with many standard datasets. The broad range of tests ensures that members of the machine learning community have worked with at least one of those test sets, and can compare their results.

Melanie