| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
| Erik Tennant
|
5
|
 |
|
11-19-2001 16:22 ET (US)
|
|
Our company has used JRF successfully on several projects. Great job!!
Recently I evaluated JRF and Cocobase for a new project. JRF was by far easier to use and had a much lower ramp-up time. There is a little more coding work up front with JRF, but usage is far simpler. Plus the source generation class provided me with 80% - 90% of what I needed anyway. We are currently using JRF for the project and are very pleased with it. Also, the documentation for JRF was outstanding.
|
| Andy Drummond
|
4
|
 |
|
04-25-2001 03:53 ET (US)
|
|
We evaluated JRF to be used between Oracle and EJBs but decided against it after some performance tests. I found it a good easy to use mapping tool but due to out required throughput we need PreparedStatements for all SQL
|
| Tom Miller
|
3
|
 |
|
04-24-2001 15:33 ET (US)
|
|
Ditto to all of the positive comments already posted. I had written an O/R mapper last year, but quickly adopted JRF as soon as I encountered it. I have made very good use of the schema-based source generator. I like the ease of extending and modifying the classes. I have used JRF with Jakarta Struts in two non-profit organization web sites to great advantage. Jonathan and the people on the user list have been very helpful when I have had questions. I look forward to a little more "out of the box" relational mapping, but it is not that much trouble to do anyway. A great tool!
|
| Steve Yost
|
2
|
 |
|
04-24-2001 15:10 ET (US)
|
|
I haven't tried other relational mapping tools, but I did look at brief blurbs about several and explored the docs of some. I'd found a page in a webzine that listed about 30 related tools. These are the things that drew me and my colleagues to it over other solutions: - open source
- straightforward and understandable
- well documented
- offered under the respected SourceForge auspices
- seemed to have a reasonably sized user community
- Explicity doesn't try to hide SQL knowledge (we really liked that)
- once I got going and had questions, your response was quick and knowledgable
Current weakness is that it doesn't go very far beyond single table mapping (though you're working on that) -- but it shouldn't go very far if it wants to keep the same appeal of simplicity. We're using it with JSP, though not directly -- layers between. The app is a financial marketplace. Excellent work! Please keep it up!
|
| joncrlsn
|
1
|
 |
|
04-24-2001 13:44 ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 04-24-2001 13:45
Please add your comments the jRelational Framework ( http://jrf.sourceforge.net). For example, you could include some or all of these types of things: - How you see this framework comparing to other relational mapping tools.
- Strengths you see in this framework.
- Weaknesses you see in this framwork.
- The kinds of tasks it does well for.
- The kinds of tasks it does not do well at.
- Why you chose this framework.
- What other technologies are you using this with? (EJB, Struts, JSP, etc.)
- What kind of application are you building with jRF (B-to-B, web store, client-server, etc.)
Thank you! Other users will appreciate the feedback, both positive and negative.
|