And some more..
,

Ni hao!
Check this out!
,

*

And some more..
*

Ahoj!
Check this out!
,

At last...
*

And some more..
*

Hola!
Check this out!
*

Hi,
I have just started using JRF and obviously I must be doing something wrong since I am all the time getting java.sql.SQLException: All JDBCHelper instances are busy
exception ....can anybody tell me under what conditions this error is created...I mean I can read error's body....but I am actaully running simple example based on source code which is provided with distribution
Thanks

Hi there !

Well... please keep this clean quick and easy to use not like the Apache's OJB...

And please convert the new release hierarchy as the first (com.is.jrf) and not like they are now when you download the beta....Sucks when you try to check if everything is ready for the next release ;)


Nice job guys, U'll go far !!!

I've had some problem compiling the last beta .........
I'm using version 1.7rc1 yet...

I´ve been reading faqs and other documentation and I see you don´t represent StoredProcedure´s as objects, you don´t have a class that represent an stored procedure, do you?

One thing you "might" consider doing is to create an RPM for this (to facilitate installing the RPM into the standard location / etc. ).

Our company has used JRF successfully on several projects. Great job!!

Recently I evaluated JRF and Cocobase for a new project. JRF was by far easier to use and had a much lower ramp-up time. There is a little more coding work up front with JRF, but usage is far simpler. Plus the source generation class provided me with 80% - 90% of what I needed anyway. We are currently using JRF for the project and are very pleased with it. Also, the documentation for JRF was outstanding.

We evaluated JRF to be used between Oracle and EJBs but decided against it after some performance tests. I found it a good easy to use mapping tool but due to out required throughput we need PreparedStatements for all SQL

Ditto to all of the positive comments already posted. I had written an O/R mapper last year, but quickly adopted JRF as soon as I encountered it. I have made very good use of the schema-based source generator. I like the ease of extending and modifying the classes. I have used JRF with Jakarta Struts in two non-profit organization web sites to great advantage. Jonathan and the people on the user list have been very helpful when I have had questions. I look forward to a little more "out of the box" relational mapping, but it is not that much trouble to do anyway. A great tool!