Please notice that figures 4 and 7 do not agree with Table 2. Assuming Table 2 is correct, the plots in figure 4 should be labeled (from left to right): dense, complete, one-vs-all, all-pairs, sparse (it should be dense instead of one-vs-all and so on). Figure 7 should be labeled according to this modification. The same thing happens for the SVM results. In figure 5, "complete" and "all-pairs" should be swapped (one-vs-all, dense and sparse are ok). Figure 6 should be modified accordingly.

A minor thing is that in page 137 (below figure 5), the errors are slightly different from the ones shown in Table 2 (72% appears as 72.9% in Table 2, 47.1 as 47.2, 39.6 as 39.7 and 27.5 as 27.8).