QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Geographic voting patterns
Views: 1156, Unique: 744 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 4-16  3-3 of 16  1-2 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
AjD  3
11-12-2000 05:32 PM ET (US)
The pattern you circle along the 'Ohio River' correlates in (the north) with
Cleveland and Pittsburgh, both traditional blue-collar union towns.

Actually, none of the blue areas correspond with the Ohio river except around Pittsburgh. The blue areas south of the Mason/Dixon line i don't know about. They're not along the Ohio River, though. The blue pattern does look, vaguely, like it follows the ridge lines of the western Appalachians, so there may still be a link between geography and voting here. I'd have to pull up a terrain map to be sure.

What I find interesting are states like Ohio, for which the eastern half was generally for Gore or Bush only carried a plurality, while the western half was solidly in Bush's camp -- you can draw a straight north-south line through the state. Cities like Cincinnati and Columbus appear to be entirely sold over to Bush, which puts a spin on the usual urban/rural split.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 4-16  3-3 of 16  1-2 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.