I just answered this email... I'm posting it here because you might have a similar question:

On 10/15/08, John K <jsk7@xxxxxxx.com> wrote:
> What's your point about them having a fire drill in one of the towers on
> 9/11? That they didn't want to have the death toll that high (50,000) but
> something more comparable to Pearl Harbor? (3000)

Thanks for writing to me, John.

I really don't have a point in the sense
that I just go with the facts.

And when I heard the rumor
that there was a fire drill -- preplanned
for 9/11, I tracked down the lead.

By shear luck, I was with my family
at my local playground and met
a surviving family member (actually
the mom and sister) and they confirmed it.

I do know that "history" (his story) is full
of exaggerations. 9/11 seems to be
no exception. The largeness of it
certainly did set off the global agenda
in motion (wars, stripping of freedoms, etc.)

There were a lot of important people
working in those buildings on 9/11... most working
in the financial sector.

It's no coincidence that the stock market
opened soon after, right... that couldn't
have happened if these important
financial people perished.

Again, I appreciate you emailing me directly.

mark

By the way, I'm saying that not even
a few hundred people died in NY on 9/11.

I say this because of this simple fact...

... When you look up the names of those
who died and match it against the SSDI
(Social Security Deathin Index), very,
very few people are shown in the database
for 9/11/2008... and the SSDI is one
of the most accurate government databases
ever maintained.

Here's the link... try it out for yourself:
http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/