The BNP on the Rocks as the Anti-Europeans Scrap Among Themselves

Ha! Ha! Ha!
It will end up as a classic ... alongside Collett's 'Young, Nazi and Proud'.

Edited by author 04-02-2008 12:40
Dear me; I have just watched BNP wives on YouTube, I was squirming with embarrassment, from the bitter jilted minus IQ northern poetess to the unholy cross of a Valkyrie and Irma Grese. The only one that seemed at all normal was Suzy Cass, who just came across as being very, very unhappy with hubby's hobby.

I did feel sorry for Nick Cass when he was sacked/shafted over the phone by Chairman Nick..

Edited by author 02-02-2008 11:57
The same way the National Front reached its peak in 1979. After that ... oblivion.
Prognostications can sometimes be premature or foolish.

The BNP has probably reached its peak. The last elections when it put up a record number of candidates were a disaster for the BNP. What with the latest substantial split and recriminations, it is headed for decline, leaving space for a possible new party to emerge that is pro-European and anti-immigration.

Edited by author 01-02-2008 21:24
Interesting to see how they fare in the London Mayoral Elections. This is the danger that these crack-pots face ... an inflated view of themselves, puffed up with hubris. Barnbrook is a bundle of contradictions.
Did you see the TV programme on 'BNP wives'? Scary! The kind of women best suited as traffic wardens or the proverbial concentration camp guard.
There is a YouTube video. Talk about dragons. St George would have his work cut out.

And the BNP claimed it was overtaking UKIP!

Edited by author 01-02-2008 12:12
And interestingly was beaten by almost a margin of 2 to 1 by UKIP, the members of whom the BNP are trying to poach.

I think we should update Little Englanders to Little Britons...

Results of a recent bye-election:

Calne Town Council Lickhill ward result (percentages in brackets):

LibDem 278 (36.20)
Con 256 (33.33)
UKIP 150 (19.53)
BNP 84 (10.94)
Green 23 (2.99)

Total 768

A GREAT VICTORY FOR THE BNP! IT BEAT THE GREEN PARTY!

From the Daily Telegraph recently:

"The billionaire investor famous for "breaking" the Bank of England in the 1990s has warned that Britain is heading for a recession. George Soros said that a recession in both the United States and Britain "will be very difficult to avoid" ... Mr Soros also warned that the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency was drawing to an end, thanks in part to the financial crisis on Wall Street ... He warned this week that the crisis facing the world's financial markets is the worst in 60 years, likely to cause a major realignment in the world economy, as emerging nations such as China and India gain more clout".

There is the argument for insulation and the creation of a self-sufficient economy on the lines of Oswald Mosley. The BNP has no answer to this problem.

For inclusion, the old 'white' dominions would have to adopt a common European currency ... and ditch the Dollar.

Under Griffin the BNP has built up a money spinning used car outlet, a dodgy insurance company and now incredibly a double-glazing outfit. Mosley's BUF and UM regarded Arabs and the Muslim World as our allies unlike the BNP. A BNP government would withdraw Britain from Europe, which would be a disaster economically. We can only regain our sovreignty from American-Global Capitalism by joining with fellow Europeans in a great self-contained, protected European home market under common European government, into which we can invite the White Dominions of Australia, New Zealand and Canada.

From the Barking and Dagenham Recorder:
BNP told: 'Don't come to Holocaust service'
ZJAN SHIRINIAN - 31 January 2008
 
A ROW has erupted after two BNP councillors were asked not to attend a Holocaust memorial service.
Cllr Robert Bailey says he was asked to stay away from the service, marking National Holocaust Memorial Day, at the Peace and Memorial Garden, Rainham Road North, Dagenham, on Monday.
But Barking and Dagenham Council leader Cllr Charles Fairbrass said Cllr Bailey had no reason to attend when the national leader of his party denies the Holocaust ever happened.
Cllr Bailey, who said he attended the service with party colleague Cllr Lawrence Rustem, despite the apparent ban, said he "expected an invite" as he was an elected councillor.
But Cllr Fairbrass, referring to BNP party leader Nick Griffin, said: "To quote his words, 'I have come to the conclusion that the extermination tale is a mixture of allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie and latter day witch hysteria'."
Cllr Fairbrass said: "In addition, on a recent TV programme, a member of the BNP commented that they had never thought much about the Holocaust, but does query the number of deaths.
"Cllr Bailey is a member of the BNP. Why would he want to attend an event that remembers the Holocaust, when the leader of the BNP said it didn't happen?"
But Cllr Bailey, who says he received a letter on Friday explaining Cllr Fairbrass thought it would be "inappropriate" for him to attend, said he did not support Mr Griffin's views.
"What Mr Griffin speaks is for himself. He doesn't speak for the party. If he said those things in the past, that's up to him. We have no policy on the Holocaust.
"We are not a party of Holocaust deniers. Mr Griffin has acknowledged that what happened during World War Two, and consequently in many countries, has been a very sad event for everybody concerned. It's a time of remembrance. People died and suffered, they should be remembered by all.

Of course we would stop all non-European immigration. Europeans would always come first.
The BNP's anti-Islamic campaign will be its eventual undoing ... even though Griffin has stated it would bring him to power. Now it is too late for them. The die is cast.

What are the main differences between European Action and the BNP? Would a NPE government stop all non-European immigration? The BNP would be better off campaigning against immigration and leaving the Islamic religion alone.

Edited by author 31-01-2008 05:57
I hear Sharon Ebanks has been interviewed for the following radio programme.

From Lancaster UAF:

Radio Four's File on Four is gathering information about party funding and is planning to broadcast its programme dealing primarily with the BNP's considerable financial problems on February 12th. Along with a bunch of other people, we've been helping out with information and have passed along anything we believe may be of help along with any supporting evidence or useful links. Now you have the chance to do the same.

If you have any information about the BNP's dodgy finances, its dealings with the American Friends of the BNP, Civil Liberty, the Trafalgar Club or anything else you believe is important enough to be mentioned, get in touch with us quickly. This is a sterling opportunity to strike at Griffin's gold-plated heart. We all know that he's only interested in the BNP because of what he can screw out of the gullible membership and now, with any luck, the party's finances could be subjected to decent, open and honest scrutiny in a forum that is open to everyone.

If you've got any info worth having, post in the comments section or, if you prefer to keep your communication away from the public eye, send it to us via email at lancaster.uaf@zen.co.uk and we will pass any relevant information across to the producer immediately. We will keep any email communication confidential.

Party funding findings

What are the concerns about the BNP's finances?

The mainstream political parties are facing sustained pressure over donations, loans and honours. But now new concerns have been raised about the finances of The British National Party. Will its records bear scrutiny?

Tuesday 12 February 2008, 2000 GMT, repeated Sunday 17 February 2008, 1700 GMT.

Edited by author 31-01-2008 05:14
You must be desperate. You are wasting your time. Everyone has gone elsewhere. This is now a ghost forum where you can whine about your 'democratisation' until the cows come home.
As always, off topic and completely uninteresting. You must stop feeling sorry for yourself.
The last word is totally unacceptable ... but then you are American. Shouldn't you have the 'mother' prefix as in the American style of speech?