QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Differentiated Instruction, Assessment, and Grading Group
Views: 2203, Unique: 599 
Subscribers: 7
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
This discussion group was created as a follow-up to a two-day conference given by Rick Wormeli on Differentiated Instruction and Assessment. It provides a place to continue to discuss his ideas and how they apply to our own practice, to our schools, and to education in general. Everyone is welcome, whether or not you attended the conference. Rick's books, Differentiation and Fair Is Not Always Equal (published by Stenhouse and available at http://www.nelms.org/bookstore.html) are excellent resources for this discussion.
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 42-45  41-41 of 45  25-40 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Rick Wormeli  41
03-24-2008 10:24 AM ET (US)
Hi Liz -- 'Sorry I haven't responded before now. I was out of the country and on spring break with my wife and children. I purposefully left the laptop and e-mail behind. :-)

You did the right thing. Ask yourself if it does any good to give students a test they are not ready to take. My answer: It doesn't. The grades don't mean anything -- they're not accurate or useful as declarations of final proficiency, and you just confirm one more time for insecure students how dumb they are, or at least that's their perception of it.

In addition, you're basing your worries on the few students who may not have studied all along or took the time to prepare for the test. If this actually happens -- they do something less than responsible, it's not the end of the world that they got away with it. It happens. If it's a pattern, however, that's when you need to act, changing whatever you're doing with them. You're right, too, to not make those other students go through more review when they've already proved themselves regarding the topic. Thanks for doing that.

If you want to do so, in these situations go ahead and give the test to everyone, regardless of readiness and call it a summative assessment for some, a formative assessment for others. The data gained from the struggling students' sense of the topic will be helpful for planning and feedback. This is basically what we do when we allow re-takes and do-overs.

Students have an innate wish to be productive, to progress. We have to accept the premise (because it's true) that students want to avoid being left in the shallow end of the pool. As they see their classmates move forward, they will want to do so as well.

Fairness is not really the issue. On the pretense of wanting to teaching accountability, we sometimes do unfair things such as test students when they are not ready to be tested. Most of our students are sincerely trying. We should design our instructional policies around those students, not the exceptions to the rule who occasionally test the limits. Of course, we come up with adaptations of policies for those who need them; one size policy doesn't fit all situations.

'Not sure if this helped or you others agree, but it's my initial response. -- Rick Wormeli
 

< replied-to message removed by QT >
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 42-45  41-41 of 45  25-40 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.