QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: shingles
Views: 192, Unique: 96 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            4-19 of 19  1-3 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Michelle Cronin  19
12-03-2007 09:08 PM ET (US)
I think your first website review was well written. You included many topics offered in the site. I did find it hard to red like others said. Even though you had paragraph breaks occassionally but it still made it very hard to read. I enjoyed the information given nd you included the requirements.

The 2nd website was difficult to see. I didn't think you put it together in the way that made it comfortable to see. You just need to create a bold topic before you begin talking about the site and that will make a world of difference.
Katie Tate  18
12-03-2007 07:38 PM ET (US)
Dr.Frolich:
I have read several of my colleagues reviews of my review and inserted paragraphs where could in my text. I was pleased to receive their praises that I followed your instructions precisely and thanks to you, I did go back in my own reviews of major and minor website and really researched who was creator and writer and why on the sites I choose. I also wrote to Susan and Gina 12-3-07, while at the library to meet 5th requirement to give them feedback, but found no new reviews or corrections. Probably I am the only student not working online at home, so their reviews might be updated later in evening from home. I thoroughly enjoyed this experience.
Gina kenyonPerson was signed in when posted  17
12-03-2007 05:20 PM ET (US)
I found the 1st website review very well writen. It includes all required elements of the review. I found the review hard to read due to no paragrah breaks.

I found the 2nd website review very well writen. It includes all required elements of the review. I found the review hard to read due to no paragrah breaks.
Susan SlaglePerson was signed in when posted  16
12-03-2007 03:00 PM ET (US)
I am very impressed with both of your reviews, as others said you followed the outline given to a T in my eyes, although it was a bit had to read because it looked to be all "ran together" To make it easier you can seperate the paragraphs by spacing between them in the edit mode..Just go into edit, find where one paragraph ends and another begins and hit the enter key twice.

All in all, great job.
Leah Walters  15
12-03-2007 11:43 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-03-2007 12:06 PM
I think that you followed the review and I don't see anything missing however, I think you need to stick with the parts of the website that it relevant to your specific topic.
The best aspect of your review was how Shingles related back to A&P. I really thought you did a great job with that.
Again, the only problem I see with your review is maybe too much information. I dont think the information from your nutrition class or other links on the website needs to be discussed in great detail, I think it may confuse readers. Although, I do believe you are right when saying that certain links on the website are strong points.
Noriko Hirata  14
11-27-2007 06:40 PM ET (US)
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/shingles
I think that your review was very well written. I like the way you organized things that our teacher asked us to include. I really reminds me of what I learned in class and also encouraged me to remember some of things.
I think that you need to include the best and worst features of this website with those links. And, I would like you to devide your writing into some paragraph to ,ake it easy for readers to read.
Kate Tate  13
11-15-2007 03:30 PM ET (US)
Kate Tate-11/14/07-Two Website Reviews on Shingles
I have chosen my first website for review because it is large and very reputable. The home page and website is as follows: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/shingles. It is the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) created by the US Congress in 1950. It is one of more than two dozen research institutes and centers which comprise the NIH (National Institutes of Health), as well as an agency of the US Public Health Department and has a reputation in world neuroscience fifty years. The scientists at NINDS are both in public and private institutions, such as medical schools and universities, hospitals, as well as employees of the Institute’s own laboratories. Their mission is to obtain new neuroscience research information and disseminate it to the world. NINDS provides grants-in-aid to public and private institutions and persons in related fields of neuroscience and information. They share the information with the world, on the world-wide website, through and with the NIH, and in publicly-available Congressional testimonies, in order to ease the burden of neurological disease in the world. Although it is made up of PhDs and MDs,like Dr. John T. Povlishock,PhD., Chair of Anatomy and Neurobiology at Virginia Commonwealth University, research fellows, assistants and staff, NINDS does not diagnose or advise individuals. Their research deals with over 600 neurological disorders which strike over an estimated 50 billion Americans alone. This extensive website covers every neurological disease and disorder known, as well as neurological consequences of diseases such as AIDS, Alzheimer’s, epilepsy, motor neuron disorder, multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons, to name a few. It provided me with extensive detailed information on my subject shingles and other links just as formidable.The strong points of the NINDS website include this well-documented knowledge, reputation and clear, easy to follow presentation. I do not find any downside to this website or its ease of use. As another of its strong points, this website offers two other excellent links to www.vzvfoundation.org and www.paincare.org, as well as its own MEDLINEplus and excellent glossary.
This website covered the subject shingles by topic: what is it? Is there treatment? Prognosis? What research is being done? To summarize here, shingles is a virus related to chickenpox (varicella zoster) and actually its name ‘variola’ from Latin which means ‘smallpox’. During the Middle Ages shingles actually disfigured and killed millions of people. At risk persons have had chickenpox, and in fact persons who have not had chickenpox will not contract shingles. Shingles begins as a rash of fluid-filled blisters, which most commonly itch and appear a skin path on the trunk, therefore, shingles derives from ‘cingulum’ or girdle; but the virus outbreak can appear on the back, neck, and more seriously the eye and face. Shingles is associated with pain, both at onset, during and following the outbreak of a rash and the pain can last for several months, as in the case of an amputee. In this context the pain is called postherpetic neuralgia abbreviated PHN. Shingles primarily appears in any immune-compromised individuals and especially chronically-ill older persons. A survey I did in my nutrition class revealed that tired students as young as 20 through 30 years of age had already had an outbreak of trunk shingles! One older fellow in our class had the facial shingles, which at its onset, doctors thought was skin cancer. It is also possible to have this virus reactivate more than once. Shingles is both contagious and not,ie., a person afflicted with shingles can actually cause a chickenpox breakout in another only if that person has never had chickenpox. Scientists are still researching specific mechanisms as to cause of the dormancy and reactivation.
In our A&PI course we learned that in the body’s infinite wisdom from the cellular level to tissues, organs and organ systems, that bodily functions are totally interdependent on the interaction or communication of the cells and systems and neural stimultion. ‘Central intelligence’, even before the formation of the brain in the developing fetus still communicates cell specialization and tissue segmentation. We learned that the skin is a most complex organ and that it has critical blood and nerve supply in order to perform its varied functions. We also learned that there are areas of skin which correspond to the segmentation based on their sensory and motor distribution. These are called dermatomes. The strip of skin which demonstrates the path of the shingles virus is exactly the distribution path of the affected sensory spinal nerve. On the excellent link website to VZVfoundation, the varicella zoster virus is described as one lying dormant and reappearing in one out of seven over the age of 85, and further, the description of facial shingles is described almost exactly in the Book of Job in the Bible, so some scientists believe it has actually evolved and mutated and survived over 70 million years! Scientists believe shingles, in the original affliction with chickenpox, leaves virus particles that leave the blisters and move into the nervous system, and when the varicella zoster virus reactivates it moves down the nerve fibers which extend from the sensory cell bodies of the dorsal root ganglia and present on the corresponding dermatome. In A&PI course and text we studied this in our neurology section which is why I found this so interesting and shingles relates to our course material this semester. In 2006 the FDA approved a VZV vaccine(Zostavax) for use in people over 60 who have had chickenpox, but only in the actual wisdom of ‘central intelligence’ will the explanation lie, as to how the body ‘remembers’ and reactivates the virus and further may remember it as in the herpes zoster ‘family’ resulting in only cold sores. In fact shingles is grouped with the herpesviruses simplex, which can also ‘hide’ in the nervous system and remain latent for years, and is related to the human papilloma viruses. When shingles presents in or near the eye, ‘ophthalmic’ shingles, can cause delayed or immediate blindness and is extremely painful; and when it is in or near the ear it is called Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome. Shingles can lead to congenital malformations in newborns if the pregnant mom is undiagnosed or untreated. Treatment ranges from zoster immune globulin in the aforementioned case to antivirals,eg.,acyclovir; pain treatment, steroids, nerve blocks. In summary, once again, we are reminded of the awesome complexity of the workings of the human body and its evolutionary journey through the ages and history of mankind and all living things. In its wisdom and beauty, the body’s own visual dermatome evidence gives a heads-up to the diagnostician!
 The second website I chose to review is smaller and meets the requirement for websites of one of each size by comparison. It is www.aftershingles.com , founded by the VNAA, Visiting Nurse Association of America (www.vnaa.org). Over 25 years of existence, this organization is extremely dedicated to the goal of achieving home health care for Americans. This shingles website was dedicated solely for the intention of providing caregivers and patients the basic information and websites with the information to assist them in dealing with shingles as an affliction. It was developed with an unrestricted grant made possible by Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., who are the makers of Lidoderm, a topical anesthetic commonly used on the skin for itch and pain in shingles. The VNAA website and organization is highly political in its workings, (which is not really a worst feature, but sponsors are on all the web pages), because they seek continual endorsement to survive. Created in 1983 as a non-profit, their mission is to “support, promote and advance Visiting Nurse Associations in their mission to serve their communities.” They utilize business development, national public imaging, member services, and government advocacy and have offices in Boston, MA and Washington, DC., which they provide on their website, along with all the other information resource websites they recommend for further study, several of which were also listed on my first NINDS website, so definitely a strongpoint to this website for me. Another strongpoint is the presentation of the material about shingles I found very easy to follow as behooves a sick or other layperson and provides answers and specifics to all questions which would be of concern to the nurse! The actual members then are the associate members, such as the home health organizations and all support products and services which participate to keep this vital American group going and they are listed, as well as their Board members list with Director Andrew Carter, CEO, topping the list with long credits to his name. Their credibility goes up as you can access all of the information presented at their Congressional hearings and meetings.
In researching all of the material on this site, I found it in agreement with most everything I had previously researched both academically and clinically with the exception to the answer to “Is shingles contagious?” and here they kept it too simple and didn’t explain that you can ‘catch it’ if you never had chickenpox before, but you would get chickenpox the first time. They just said, “No. You cannot get shingles from someone who has it” – based on the fact it is ‘hidden within,’ as we discussed above. This could be misleading and potentially dangerous. They did make the statement just above this that “only people who have had chickenpox can get shingles,” and further on they do discuss this accurately. So no criticism here as to information accuracy. I truly enjoyed reading this site over and gained much practical information clinically from it to apply to my nursing and caregiving work. For example in explaining the pain and itch symptoms, it allowed me to relate better to what potentially patients might be suffering and they explained postherpetic pain very simply for the layperson. Treatment options were varied and represented the common choices well with no prejudicial treatment of one company or product over another. They did point out that Lidoderm is presently the only specific FDA-approved medication for treatment of PHN, but I believe it does work the best by patch and topically in the cases I have witnessed. The downside by reviewing this website was that it correlates exactly and with less specifics to the first, more detailed website number one and so, in this case, I am hardpressed to add anything new which correlates to the anatomy and physiology of class, except to state that it relates in the ways described above. I would like to add though that I do believe that it shingles reactivation is most definitely under immune and nervous system control, but the fact that it potentially lays dormant in the anterior gray horns of the spinal cord (reference to our textbook) is fascinating to me. New research is looking into the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid and links to precancerous red flags in biochemistry.
Larry Frolich  12
11-08-2007 08:48 PM ET (US)
Katie, interesting topic and websites. I can see just about any of these being a major website. I'm not sure if you want to get into the very technical articles that are in the journals you have posted. I'm not sure which you would use a minor website...maybe the pamphlet after shingles.

Please be sure you tellus who is posting each website and why.

Choose topic: 10 points
Find four websites: 15 points
Peer reviews: 10 points
Leah Walters  11
11-06-2007 07:32 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-06-2007 07:37 AM
The first website www.ninds was informative as to what Shingles is and treatment and prognosis for this virus. The website was a little hard to navigate.
The second website www.aftershingles.com had the most information and the website was very user friendly.
The third website www.archederm.ama was my least favorite. You have to search for what you are looking for a litte to hard and when I tried to get a full text of the article it wanted a username and password from me.
The forth website www.archneur.ama had a lot of information and articles however you had to really search around to find the information.
Nancy Burgeson  10
11-05-2007 11:51 PM ET (US)
Shingles-Topic 3
National Institute of Neurological Disorders Like-This site is a wonderful reference for information on Shingles. The links are very helpful; there is a wealth of information available on the site. Dislike-I cannot really find anything about the site that I dislike. It is a reputable source, and is presented in an interesting manner.

After Shingles-Like-I found this to be an excellent source of information for the student or the patient who develops Shingles. There is a great deal of information included about the disease as well, as after having Shingles. Dislike-I don’t really find anything that I dislike about this site.

Arch Dermatology-Like-There is a great deal of information available on this site. The site is from a book which the site states to be the best source available on the subject of Shingles. Dislike-I would use this site for an in-depth study of the disease, but I would find it dull for casual reading or investigation.

Archives of Neurology-Like-A good source of information linking to articles on neurology and Shingles. Dislike-I find this type of site to be confusing, but if I were doing a paper or research on the subject, I would utilize
Michelle CroninPerson was signed in when posted  9
11-05-2007 05:57 PM ET (US)
Shingles websites:
1. I really though that your first website had great information. It gave me a lot of information I wanted to know about the disease. I think this site will be good to find out more but you might want to find a site that may inform you more on information other than the basics.
2. I really liked the information on your second website. I always find it nice to have topics you can click to find exactly what you want. I think it has a lot of valuable information about the disease. One really cool aspect about this website is that you can click on words inside the text that connect you to a link such as a definition. Very helpful if there is a struggle with the words.
3. Your third topic only gave a few paragraphs about the main article and had a link to view the full text. When I clicked it, it said I had to prescribe to the website.
4. When website 4 came up it was a list of articles. I do not know which articles you wish us to view.
Sue Slagle  8
11-05-2007 11:20 AM ET (US)
1.
NINDS Shingles Information Page
Pros
A. The explanation of shingles, what the symptoms are, and what it looks like, etc is very informative.
B. Adding links for further information was a definite plus.
Cons
A. The research information could go into further detail about advancements in treatments, or cures.
B. Nothing under treatments in regards to people who may have HIV or maybe a transplant recipient, can they get the immunization?

2.
http://www.aftershingles.com/shingles.html
Pros
A. This website is very informative, and it goes into deep detail, especially in the symptoms area.
B. Covers a lot of the common questions that would/could be asked
Cons
A. Under the “who gets shingles” topic, the first paragraph needs to be restructured to add all who are affected, then the third paragraph could be omitted or added to another.
B. No links to other websites for references, or where a person could retrieve more information

3. http://archderm.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/e...&resourcetype=HWCIT
 Pros
A. Very informative
B. A lot of research has gone into the topic
Cons
Website loaded very slowly

4. http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/search?fu...S00878/DSECTION=211
Pros
A. Very informative
B. A lot of research has gone into the topic
Cons
A. Again, website very slow to load.
Noriko HirataPerson was signed in when posted  7
11-02-2007 09:03 PM ET (US)
I really like the first website. It was very informative; explanations and pictures are nice! The second and third website have a concise summary. The forth and fifth did not work for me.
Gina kenyonPerson was signed in when posted  6
10-30-2007 12:46 AM ET (US)
the fourth link didnt work either.
Gina kenyonPerson was signed in when posted  5
10-30-2007 12:44 AM ET (US)
The archives of dermetology website was easy to navigate and straight foward and to the point although i was able to find shingles listed in the contents page.
Gina kenyonPerson was signed in when posted  4
10-30-2007 12:38 AM ET (US)
the second link www.ninds.nih.gov link did not work.
RSS link What's this?
All messages            4-19 of 19  1-3 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.