top bar
QuickTopic free message boards logo
Skip to Messages

TOPIC:

State of Computer Graphics Research

(not accepting new messages)
^     All messages            752-767 of 767  736-751 >>
767
Michael AshikhminPerson was signed in when posted
12-23-2010
03:43 AM ET (US)
 Visited this page almost by chance and it is amazing how much spam can accumulate in any given place if nobody is watching. Clearly, if this forum ever had any use to/interest of the CG research community, it has neither any longer. So if anyone wants to continue the subject, please do it somewhere else - there are plenty of places out there dedicated to CG and CG research in particular.

 Please click "Printer-friendly Page" on the left to see all relevant posts made in this forum over its existance - I believe I cleaned up the spam but that resulted in not-too-great default view.

 Thanks to everyone who over the past few years expressed support for this forum and its administrator,

 M.Ashikhmin
Edited 12-23-2010 03:52 AM
  Messages 766-407 deleted by author 12-23-2010 03:30 AM
406
HullSmurfPerson was signed in when posted
10-15-2010
11:24 AM ET (US)
I want to say somthing about the evaluation in CG research. There is no standard evaluation in most of topics in CG though it is important. At least in my area (NPR) there is no. I guess that why most of research work wrapped with lower techniques but greater appearance.
^     All messages            752-767 of 767  736-751 >>