QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Many recalls
Views: 2740, Unique: 724 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 19-29  18-18 of 29  2-17 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Kirk M  18
08-04-2006 06:29 PM ET (US)
Unfortunately, John Mulcahy was allowed to print that article without checking his facts. Everyone of those claims are in fact true. For example, the township did put up $200,000 and Christina did get the grant for $150,000. It was only recently that someone got wise and decided that was not a good idea. But it still happened and it was printed last winter in the same local paper that you seem to put so much faith it.

I don't want to go into detail, but the other claims are all true as well. John failed to mention the other 12 claims againt the township. He declined to mention those...increased water rates, sewer rates, garbage collection. Why do we now have a charge on our water meters? We already own our meters.

Anyway, the list goes on and on. Feel free to ignore the latest news of how they have sold out to the developers at your own risk. As for me, I am voting "yes".
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 19-29  18-18 of 29  2-17 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.