QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: The Ziti Project
Views: 9173, Unique: 918 
Subscribers: 2
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  296
11-01-2009 09:56 PM ET (US)
I've just moved the ZP to a new web host. If I'm wildly successful, you won't notice any difference. But if you do notice any changes, please tell me.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  295
11-01-2009 08:25 PM ET (US)
Looks like I've got a lot of catching up to do!

/m291 Sorry to hear about Boots and Moe, Francine. Didn't we do a little whack dialog years ago in Moe's honor? (I've still got it somewhere, I think.)

/m292 Gesundheit!

/m293 Look, hello, the last thing I need is another wedding invitation. Cake, cake, cake! I'm sick to death of it - 'ya hear? The very next wedding that I get invited to I'm gonna eat the little plastic bride and groom, not the cake. Don't _make_ me do it...

/m294 Good to hear from you again, Will! I agree about paying for gas and electricity. So I've got a plan. I'm gonna plug one end of my extension cord into the other to get free electricity. OK, I'll confess that I haven't figured out yet where to plug in the leaf blower, but I'm certain it's a tractable problem; I've applied for a grant from DARPA.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  294
10-27-2009 09:33 PM ET (US)
hello, I want one of those water-powered homes; I'm sick of paying for gas and electricity. However, chorines, even the bleached blondes, probably would process wedding invites very nicely.
hello  293
10-26-2009 09:35 PM ET (US)
People cut down trees to make paper. wedding invitationsHence, in order to print a large number of wedding invitations a lot of trees are cut. When trees are cut, the environment is damaged severely. Hence, wedding invitationwe must not cut down trees as it is the best source of oxygen not only for us but also for all living creatures to survive. Regarding usage of the recycled paper, it is a well known fact that it saves 7000 gallons of water and this amount of water is enough to power a home for six months. Hence, we must make use of recycled paper for the purpose of wedding invitations. unique wedding invitationsIt is also important to confirm before buying that recycled paper is made up of recycled material. It must be Processed Chorine Free which means that there should be no usage of bleach in the production.
Wzxbflqd  292
07-15-2009 07:27 PM ET (US)
zaK40Z
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  291
06-16-2009 02:52 PM ET (US)
/m290 Their passing has left a hole in our lives and now and then something reminds me of them and I get a sinking feeling. Time will heal though I'll always miss them. I know what you're going through with the passing of Mollie but she and the other furry angels did brighten our lives for a span. I don't think we'll get another pet because Rick will be retiring next year and we hope to travel. Sending good wishes your way, my cyber-friend :-)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  290
06-15-2009 06:37 PM ET (US)
/m288 Sam, thank you so much for thinking of me. I'm at the point now where I only cry about my Mollie 2-3 times a week, instead of (at least) 2-3 times a day, so I am making progress. I hope you and your family (human and pets) are well.

/m289 Francine, I am so very sorry to hear of your heartbreaking double loss. I know how much you loved your boys and can only imagine how difficult a blow that's been for you, especially since I've been so grateful I still have my Rainer with me. I hope your loving memories of Moe and Boots can give you comfort. I appreciate your sharing the link to that story. It was such a touching and heartfelt expression that reminds us all of us dog lovers why we feel the way we do. I know that you might not be ready yet, but how do you and Rick feel about getting another canine companion?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  289
06-13-2009 10:10 AM ET (US)
Karin, I had to recently put down Boots and Moe about a month apart and when I came across this article about the dignity of old dogs I thought I'd share with you, knowing that you also experienced a loss:

http://www.theweek.com/article/index/89914...s_are_the_best_dogs
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  288
06-09-2009 01:46 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 06-09-2009 01:49 PM
/m287 Thanks for the link, Karin. I enjoyed that one.

BTW, I saw "Marley and Me" recently which made me think of your loss of Mollie. I hope you're beginning to feel a little better by now.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  287
05-17-2009 12:30 AM ET (US)
Hey guys, I read this article and thought my fellow word lovers would find it interesting as well: http://www.nypost.com/seven/05162009/posto...t_169585.htm?page=0.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  286
03-11-2009 12:56 PM ET (US)
Francine,

Thanks for your kind thoughts here & on the other board. I know you are a dog lover too and understand how I'm feeling. :)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  285
03-11-2009 11:28 AM ET (US)
Karin, Mollie felt your love and you gave her a good life. My condolences.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  284
03-09-2009 11:22 PM ET (US)
/m283 Sam, thanks for the input. Unfortunately I think I'm actually going to have to get a new computer first! This one appears to be in its death throes. Any advice from you or anyone else on a dependable desktop?

I also have some sad news. My beloved Mollie, whom I've spoken of so often through the years, passed away yesterday morning. She had been through some illnesses recently and Sunday morning it was obvious she had worsened quite a bit so we made the decision to end her suffering. She gave us an incredible amount of joy and was a vital part of our family, so we're really down right now. Her little "brother" Rainer was extremely attached to her so he's depressed too. Mark and I are trying to make sure we give him lots to do to keep his mind active and help him bounce back. Fortunately for dogs, they're able to get through this more quickly than humans can.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  283
02-03-2009 01:22 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 02-04-2009 06:12 PM
/m281 Sorry it's taken several months for me to get back to you, Beefy. Regarding 213, I was hampered for awhile by the word 'hamper', which to folks around here usually means a thing you put dirty clothes in. However, I looked it up on the Internet somewhere, and it appears that you might have meant what we call a 'picnic basket' here. Anyway, Will seems to have gotten the idea. I tried to continue it just now, but I accidentally ended it in the process. :-( Sorry about that!

/m282 It's great to hear from you again, Karin! As you may have seen, things have been pretty slow around the ZP lately. Regarding browsers, I personally favor Firefox, but Opera is also good, probably even better than Firefox - I'm just in the habit of using Firefox so I tend to stick with it.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  282
12-15-2008 11:56 PM ET (US)
Hey all. I know it's been a long time since you heard from me. This last year has been quite rough in a lot of ways, but I'm hoping things will be better in 2009. Hope you guys are all well.

I do need some help from the computer literate among us. I am thinking of switching from IE to another browser and wonder if you have some suggestions. Thanks!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  281
09-16-2008 08:38 AM ET (US)
/m280

I had lunch with the Spoonmaster last month. He's had a number of other projects which have now completed, and he was talking about reviving the Spoonbill although, since he'll need to move it to a new server, I didn't get the impression it's imminent.

On ZP 213, I had a vague idea that we'd do four poems, one for each season, six stanzas long, each introducing the next (just because that's how the first one panned out) so I've continued it, but I'm happy to be overruled - at the present rate of contribution, it'll take a decade to cover a year anyway :-)
Kansas Sam  280
09-05-2008 02:03 PM ET (US)
Well, gang, since the Spoonbill has been out of commission for so long, I decided to post a link to to the ZP on its QT. We'll see what happens.

I also looked around for other venues on the Internet that might be suitable to publicize the ZP, but I didn't immediately find much. So, I'm open to suggestions.
Kansas Sam  279
09-05-2008 01:59 PM ET (US)
/m277 /m278 Thanks, guys! - I'll pass that on to Helen.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  278
05-14-2008 11:00 AM ET (US)
/m277 Hear, hear!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  277
05-08-2008 02:41 AM ET (US)
/m275 Thanks, Sam, and good luck with the new job.
Melissik  276
05-02-2008 06:49 PM ET (US)
One afternoon, I was in the backyard hanging the laundry when an old, tired-looking dog wandered into the yard. I could tell from his collar and well-fed belly that he had a home. But when I walked into the house, he followed me, sauntered down the hall and fell asleep in a corner. An hour later, he went to the door, and I let him out. The next day he was back. He resumed his position in the hallway and slept for an hour.
This continued for several weeks. Curious, I pinned a note to his collar: "Every afternoon your dog comes to my house for a nap. "
The next day he arrived with a different note pinned to his collar: "He lives in a home with ten children - he's trying to catch up on his sleep."
 
I cried from laughter
Sorry, if not left a message on Rules.
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  275
05-01-2008 01:46 PM ET (US)
Thanks to all who helped on 209. (Good wrap-up, Francine!) As it turns out, 209 wasn't ready in time for my going-away lunch, but I didn't really find an opportunity at that for speechifying anyway.

I started my new job this past week, and it's going well. I've already managed to recruit a new personality there, Mr. Grant Mild. I hope Sam, Grant, and I can become more active again on the ZP soon.
   274
03-26-2008 09:27 PM ET (US)
Deleted by topic administrator 03-27-2008 02:19 AM
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  273
03-17-2008 10:13 PM ET (US)
Hey, remember the old days when I used to post favorite poems? Well, in honor of St. Paddy's Day, here's an Irish poem I think is quite lovely:

BROKEN VOWS (translated by Lady Gregory)
 
It is late last night the dog was speaking of you;
the snipe was speaking of you in her deep marsh.
It is you are the lonely bird through the woods;
and that you may be without a mate until you find me.

You promised me, and you said a lie to me,
that you would be before me where the sheep are flocked;
I gave a whistle and three hundred cries to you,
and I found nothing there but a bleating lamb.

You promised me a thing that was hard for you,
a ship of gold under a silver mast;
twelve towns with a market in all of them,
and a fine white court by the side of the sea.

You promised me a thing that is not possible,
that you would give me gloves of the skin of a fish;
that you would give me shoes of the skin of a bird,
and a suit of the dearest silk in Ireland.

It is early in the morning that I saw him coming,
going along the road on the back of a horse;
he did not come to me;
he made nothing of me;
and it is on my way home that I cried my fill.

When I go by myself to the Well of Loneliness,
I sit down and I go through my trouble;
when I see the world and do not see my boy,
he that has amber shade in his hair.

It was On that Sunday I gave my love to you;
the Sunday that is last before Easter Sunday.
And myself on my knees reading the Passion;
and my two eyes giving my love to you for ever.

My mother said to me not to be talking with you to-day,
or tomorrow, or on the Sunday;
it was a bad time she took for telling me that;
it was shutting the door after the house was robbed.

My heart is as black as the blackness of the sloe,
or the black coal that is on the smith's forge;
or as the sole of a shoe left in white halls;
it was you put that darkness into my life.

You have taken the east from me;
you have taken the west from me;
you have taken what is before me and what is behind me;
you have taken the moon,
you have taken the sun from me;
and my fear is great
that you have taken God from me!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  272
03-15-2008 02:28 AM ET (US)
/m271 You're welcome and thank <i>you</>. :-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  271
03-14-2008 07:09 AM ET (US)
Francine, thank you for your line on 202 - I just couldn't come up with one I liked - yours is just what I was searching for :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  270
03-13-2008 05:29 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-13-2008 05:30 AM
/m269 Good Lord! If someone were to put that in a movie or novel, it would be considered implausible, to say the least.

Hey, how are all my Ziti friends doing these days? I haven't been checking in too much lately. Been busy.

I was on some other message boards recently where you can post images. I wonder if QT allows that? I'm gonna try. Here goes.

Well, that didn't work. Just gave the link instead of embedding the image.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  269
03-12-2008 03:52 PM ET (US)
Just when you think you've heard it all - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23595533/
Evan  268
03-05-2008 03:13 PM ET (US)
/m267 I don't know either -- but I think I'm on the right track.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  267
02-26-2008 11:40 PM ET (US)
I'm not sure if Helen found a feeder on 205 or if she was just being...well, you know..."Helen".
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  266
02-25-2008 11:53 PM ET (US)
/m265 I don't know if 206 allows consecutive contributions, but you've been getting such good results with feeder lines lately that I decided to try fishing for a certain triple rhyme on "Obama". That didn't work out, but I think Francine's line is even better than what I had in mind!

BTW, what are the odds that someone whose first name more-or-less rhymes with a country the U.S. recently went to war with, and whose last name rhymes with the name of the guy who likely made that war politically possible, could ever be a real contender (or "contendah", as Brando would say) for the Presidency? What's that old saw about truth being stranger than fiction?...
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  265
02-22-2008 12:19 PM ET (US)
The next line I had in mind for ZP204 was "Become a Post-Pre-Raphaelite" - ironic that I, who generally oppose consecutive contributions, was thwarted by the one current poem that doesn't allow them!
PIORIGEPRUG  264
01-13-2008 01:00 PM ET (US)
Make love, not war!
Tucker  263
12-29-2007 03:36 AM ET (US)
Drat! :-) I spoke too soon arch. You're back. Google "sildenafils pitapats" ... and you get rinus' pipapats from 12/21/07 [12986] and his sildenafils from 12/24/07 [12992] (the day after I left my "congratulations", naturally :-). It seems to like him!

Tucker

PS: thanks rinus re pitapats comment
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  262
12-24-2007 01:56 PM ET (US)
/m261 Thanks Tucker! Happy Holidays to you and everyone else here :)
Tucker  261
12-23-2007 07:47 PM ET (US)
I thanked you on GW arch, but hadn't come over here to do so yet and figured I should. Much appreciate you fixing it. I've had no problems with it lately ... indeed, I haven't seen it pop up at all for quite some time. I also apologize for assumption that it was intentional. I knew some of the folks over here had little use for Gary and were ... irritated ... at GW for, among other things, at least in some cases, actually banning them. When unthunk started showing up I erroneously assumed (like several other "destroy googlewhack" sites on the 'net), you folks were intentionally trying to screw it up. Anyway, again, apologies and thanks. (And I appreciate that you've got an "alternate" site here!) Have a great Christmas everyone. Tuck
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  260
12-10-2007 04:53 PM ET (US)
/m259 Just a quick follow-up, thunklist.php and all its variations appear to be off the Google index finally, yay! There are a handful of links from the homepage that may still be indexed, but for the most part the thunklist is no longer indexed. If anyone runs into any unthunk pages still on the list let me know.

archaeopteryx
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  259
12-06-2007 12:02 PM ET (US)
/m257 Tucker, sorry about the frustration and the bad luck with the autos. I've been trying to get the thunklist off Google's index since the relaunch. So far, I have managed to prevent any new indexing of the list except for the homepage and am trying to get Google to remove the cached pages with the list. As Will pointed out, feel free to use the UT-QT or if you would like to contact me personally feel free to use the contact form on unthunk.

Until the relaunch a few months ago, the thunklist had required logging in to view it -- something that prevented Google from indexing it. This had been the practice since Unthunk started in 2004. I certainly did not intend for the thunklist to ever be indexed by Google. Unthunk was created as an alternate outlet for googlewhackers (mostly the folks posting on this board) who to some effect were frustrated with googlewhack. Many of us have continued to post at Googlewhack, and the thunklist was kept hidden from Google to prevent interefering with Googlewhack. The recent redesign allowed the list to be publicly viewable for the first time, but unfortunately it did not adequately prevent Google from indexing it. My apologies again, please bear with me until I can get the list off Google.

archaeopteryx
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  258
12-02-2007 10:49 PM ET (US)
Tucker, I'm a once-a-week unthunker lately, so I may not experience your frustration. Please visit the UT-QT for more information.
Tucker  257
12-02-2007 03:20 PM ET (US)
I got really frustrated at unthunk yesterday and blasted it badly on GW. Thought I'd should apologize. I was out of line. I don't know why suddenly unthunk is showing up with such ubiquity recently. But it is by far the worst (most prevalent) list that I have to deal with these days (presumably because we all use a lot of the same words ... but that was true three months ago also and it wasn't a problem then). Mysteries of Google, I guess. Anyway, I apologize for the rant and anyone who took it personally. [Wife badly mangled my truck yesterday and I banged up my car ... very slick out ... and rest of day was just as bad and I was *really* in a rotten mood and it seemed that everything I tried to whack ... "unthunk the list" screwed up ... and I just lost it.] Anyway, figured I owed it to you folks to come over here and apologize also (I apologized on GW). Tucker
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  256
11-30-2007 01:20 PM ET (US)
Evan  255
11-15-2007 01:52 PM ET (US)
Karin et al, I took a look at Spoonbill, and while you can view the poems you can't contribute to them (Not Found message). And they all have contribution dates of at least 6 months ago. On the home page it states the following,

"September 2007: The Spoonbill Generator has been offline for some time - the server was hacked and had to be replaced.
A few changes are currently being made behind the scenes, and there are no live poems just yet, but the Golden Treasury is accessible, and other classic works like The rat Fathom and The Mammary Revival."

I poked around the old SG QuickTopic and found this link to the Orange poem:
http://www.spoonbill.org/poem.php?name=poem&value=orange. And if you type in pegleg instead of orange, you will find the pegleg. But, of course you can't contribute to them.

So, I guess big problems over at Spoonbill. It's too bad, I hope it gets fixed.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  254
11-15-2007 02:12 AM ET (US)
Evan, glad you're back here and on Unthunk. Spoonbill seems to be back but our bookmarks for our private pegleg poem doesn't seem to work. Has anyone been able to locate it?

On a totally different subject - who'd thunk that Bubbles would become the Prime Minister one day? I sure didn't see that one coming!
Evan  253
11-14-2007 04:09 PM ET (US)
/m250 Thanks F, and hi again everyone. Please don't take offense Sam, Arch, but I hadn't Zitied or Thunked for so long that I kinda forgot about it all. It's nice to be back. Life had a very hectic stretch there for a while, but I'll try to improve my attendance from now on. Is Spoonbill still going along? I'll have to check into that, too.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  252
11-08-2007 11:55 PM ET (US)
/m251 Some kind of glitch, Will. Reminds me of that SNL skit, "The Thing That Wouldn't Leave."
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  251
11-08-2007 06:46 PM ET (US)
How many votes does it take to end zp198?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  250
11-07-2007 02:48 AM ET (US)
/m249 Your contribution was just fine, Will. No need to modify.

Hey, notice that Evan is back? Welcome back, Evan.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  249
11-03-2007 01:03 PM ET (US)
ZP201 should be fun. If anyone has ideas to modify any of my contributions, let me know here. We can collaborate.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  248
10-31-2007 11:47 PM ET (US)
/m247 ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  247
10-31-2007 02:58 PM ET (US)
/m264 Interesting article! Perhaps I should rant about it ;)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  246
10-30-2007 11:26 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-30-2007 11:43 PM
Speaking of rants - http://www.slate.com/id/2176968/

I miss your rants too Francine - thankfully yours are quite entertaining without resorting to profanity. :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  245
10-27-2007 02:02 AM ET (US)
/m244 Thanks, Sam! Yeah, I decided to edit it because it was just another long ramble about stuff I've already posted many a time. How much I enjoy the ziti and the people here, how I've gotten used to the irregular frequency of contributions which I used to rant about, blah, blah.
  BTW, thanks again for all the work you've put into this site. You and arch both (per his Unthunk site). I sure appreciate the Ziti and Unthunk. Whiles away much of my late night leisure time in a most enjoyable and creative way :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  244
10-26-2007 09:13 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-26-2007 11:45 PM
Thanks for the kind words, Kids. (BTW, F, I liked the first version of /m242 better. ;-) As I'm sure you could tell, I was rather discouraged when I wrote /m240, but I later figured out how to manually delete spam pages on a mass-production basis. (Ain't tabbed browsing great?) So, I was eventually able to delete all of 'em. More pages have since appeared, but I've gotten so I kindda enjoy deleting them and blocking their zombie-machine authors every now and then: it's the same sort of misplaced thrill one gets stepping on a cockroach--though without the yin/yang of the sickening-mess/gratifying-crunch, of course. And at least it's more useful than reading Slashdot.

I've researched methods of preventing these things, and it looks like some of them wouldn't be too hard to get going. One of the most interesting involves "captchas". (Try out this--it's a lotta fun for about 15 minutes.) The easiest thing, though would be just to move the Zitipedia to a new private location; I'll probably do that soon after I grow bored with stomping the cockroaches. And when I do, I'll be sure to tell everybody here the new address so you folks will be able to go back to ignoring it properly. ;-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  243
10-22-2007 10:12 AM ET (US)
And so say all of us!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  242
10-11-2007 03:19 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-13-2007 01:48 PM
/m241 I'll second that.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  241
10-09-2007 11:35 PM ET (US)
/m240 Sam, sorry to hear about the Zitipedia. I confess that I had pretty much forgotten about it. It was a good idea, and I'm sorry it didn't work out.

I want to thank you again for putting your time and resources into developing and maintaining the Ziti site for us. Even though my contributions tend to be sporadic, I really do value it and the interaction it provides with all my fellow versifiers. :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  240
10-09-2007 08:32 PM ET (US)
My Friends,

Although I originally had high hopes for the Zitipedia as a gizmo that would provide a very flexible facility for the Greater Good of the High Cause of the Creation of Nonsense, it turned out to be of exactly zero interest to all but me. Although I was a little disappointed by that, I have always made it a point not to try to force anything on anybody, so I didn't say much about it. And the Zitipedia wasn't costing me anything so I decided to simply let it sit, with the hope that some new Zitizen might come along one day who _would_ get interested in it.

Unfortunately, I have discovered recently that a large number of "link spamming" pages have been added to the Zitipedia by automated systems originating, evidently, in China. I then began a small personal crusade to manually delete these pages and ban their authors from the Zitipedia forever. However, that has turned out to be impractical due to the numerousity of such pages. Although it would be possible for me to automate that process in some way--or even to just blow the whole Zitipedia database away and start over--it simply doesn't make sense for me spend that much time/effort on something that no one was using anyway. And although pages that nobody is reading can't do any harm, I find their very existence offensive. Therefore, I plan to dismantle the Zitipedia in the next week or so, as time permits.

Although I enjoy the Age of the Internet as much as anyone--and I truly value the cyber-friendships I have made with all of you as a result!--a sad implication of this glorious technology is that it allows vandals to operate from the other side of the world on a large scale, via robots. (As an example, we need look no further than /m239.) Oh, and there's also the problem of "cracks" that my poor corporeal friends at Iowegian International Corporation have to fight--that actually costs them Cash Dollars American. (Search for "ScopeFIR" and you'll find more "crack" pages than pages about the product itself.) I'm not sure what the answer to all that is--presumably, there isn't any, just as there isn't any for the age-old, if slightly more benign, vandalism of TP-ing. However, I, for one am tired of pulling the cyber-TP out of the digital trees. So, to all of you automated Chinese cybervandals out there who aren't reading this right now because you're too damn stupid, I can only say, "You win".

That said, the pome mechanism of the Ziti Project still seems to be free from any form of cybervandalism, so although I haven't had much enthusiasm for writing pomery myself lately, I'll be glad to keep that part of it going as long as I can.

Sam
Alexraa  239
10-03-2007 08:54 AM ET (US)
If you want do delete your site from our spam bases - just email us with domain of your site:

abuse-here@inbox.ru

thank you!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  238
08-20-2007 12:29 PM ET (US)
/m217 et seq. and yet ZP 199 archived like a dream
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  237
08-12-2007 08:26 PM ET (US)
/m236 Sam, I last went to Grant's Farm and the Arch ten years ago, lots of fun! My wife and the boys were just in that neck of the woods a few weeks ago -- they had a blast at the science center. She grew up about an hour from St. Louis in Illinois; they were back visiting her folks.

archaeopteryx
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  236
08-11-2007 11:40 PM ET (US)
/m232 I guess my own theory is that it's a simply a bug. Or, as Napoleon so aptly put it, "Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."

I haven't had a chance to dig into the problem yet (my dopey corporeal just got back from vacation in which he rode up the still-working half of a certain arch that's even more famous than our own good archaeopteryx), but I hope to do so soon. Oh, and he also has to recover from receiving two free beverages each from two separate Anheuser-Busch sites: Grant's Farm (at which he bought both a t-shirt and a hat, Arch...) and the main brewery.

Also, I think the disappearance of names in the voting might be due it showing only the last five votes. I'm not sure, though--I'm pretty rusty on the inner workings of the ZP by now.
Vilyamxg  235
08-08-2007 08:10 PM ET (US)
Hello! great idea of color of this siyte!
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  234
08-08-2007 12:26 PM ET (US)
/m233 Hi Karin, my voted had also disappeared. I went back just now and chose: "Change your vote", "Continue section", and "End work and archive" and my vote was added back in. I'll see if Howly Ellen can add a vote to end as well.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  233
08-08-2007 12:14 PM ET (US)
/m232 Francine, I don't know who Matthew is, but I guess you missed my /m230. I was hoping someone would add a final line to this stanza and then I'll vote as Mark to end it. I just checked out it out and I notice that now my vote (as Karin) to end it seems to have disappeared. I have no idea how that happened. Also, Sam, I tried to log back in as Mark so I could try voting to end it now even though it's unfinished and I already forgot the password I created for him, not to mention which security question I chose. Is there any way you can find my password and email it to me, please? Is this complicated enough yet?!?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  232
08-08-2007 02:32 AM ET (US)
/m230 Well, I also voted again to end and that didn't work. I'm assuming some hacker/troll by the name of Matthew/Mark got in and tried to mess with the mechanism to see if he could keep a pome from ending and it looks like he's succeeded.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  231
08-06-2007 09:42 AM ET (US)
/m230 Good idea, K!
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  230
08-06-2007 01:27 AM ET (US)
Ok, here's my contribution to the murder, most foul, of zp198. I have registered Mark and contributed (as him) the first line of a new section. If we can try finishing it up quickly, I will then add Mark's vote to end the work. Just a thought.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  229
08-04-2007 12:26 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-04-2007 01:58 AM
/m228 Wow, I am really losing it! I absolutely don't remember adding that. I s'pose now you guys will start giving me "credit" for all the lines/jokes/rhymes that didn't quite work out and no one wants to claim. ;-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  228
08-03-2007 11:42 PM ET (US)
/m226 Yup, that one was yours. I zapped and added it back (which I can only do in my own name, so I used that form to give you proper credit) in the hopes that that would solve the problem. Alas, it didn't.

The ZP machine has been unchanged for quite some time now, so I'm surprised that we would see this problem for the first time now. (Or _have_ we seen it before?) About the only thing about 198 that stands out as unusual is that it was started by "matthew".
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  227
08-03-2007 01:29 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-03-2007 03:13 PM
/m226 Karin, the one I received was really like new. EDIT: I checked my amazon account, the seller was belles-books, FYI.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  226
08-02-2007 11:53 PM ET (US)
/m224 Arch, what kind of condition is the "used - like new" stuff in?

/m225 Sam, is one of the things you tried to end 198 submmitting "Tiramisu" under my name? I am quite fond of tiramisu but when I saw it there I got kind of confused, as I don't remember doing it! Then I read your post and perhaps put it all together.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  225
08-02-2007 05:39 PM ET (US)
/m218 I'm just glad it's not the Son of Sam. ;-)

/m219 I've tried a couple of things, but have yet to find the right wooden stake. I probably won't have time to dig in and fix it for at least a week, but I'll try to get it killed soon.

/m224 Garsh, arch, I though the days where you could get something for a penny (plus four bucks for S+H) were long gone.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  224
07-31-2007 03:51 PM ET (US)
/m223 I ordered it from Amazon "Used - like new!" for a penny plus S+H, so it was like four bucks.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  223
07-31-2007 03:34 PM ET (US)
/m222 Ah - it does sound interesting. If I ever have some time maybe I'll read it.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  222
07-31-2007 01:11 PM ET (US)
/m221 He's a comedian that decides he needs to do something serious - write a novel. While putting off working on the book, he gets an email from an Aussie telling him he's a googlewhack. After figuring out what a googlewhack is, he goes on a global quest to meet the people that own googlewhacked sites in an ever growing chain. I enjoyed it :)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  221
07-31-2007 11:59 AM ET (US)
/m220 No. I've heard a lot about it but never looked into it. What exactly is the premise?
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  220
07-31-2007 11:35 AM ET (US)
I just finished reading Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure last night. It reminded me of the good old days of googlewhacking (sigh). Any of you read it?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  219
07-30-2007 10:47 PM ET (US)
/m217 Yeah, what's up with that? Sam, can you fix it?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  218
07-30-2007 10:46 PM ET (US)
/m216 Yes, it mutated, like its protagonist, the imp of Satan :-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  217
07-26-2007 11:09 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 07-26-2007 11:09 AM
ZP 198 appears to be immortal :-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  216
07-26-2007 11:05 AM ET (US)
I nominate ZP196 as the poem that's wandered furthest from its origins :-)
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  215
06-29-2007 02:58 PM ET (US)
I've taken zp199 to reflect the expression of an ESL speaker.
Coco Chanel  214
06-19-2007 05:29 PM ET (US)

And some more..
,
Gordon_st  213
06-19-2007 05:29 PM ET (US)
Hej!
Check this out!
,
Buckster_tmh  212
06-18-2007 04:07 PM ET (US)
Nei ho!
Check this out!
,
Lee_fd  211
06-18-2007 10:51 AM ET (US)

*
Elena_cx  210
06-18-2007 10:51 AM ET (US)

At last...
*
Sabina_mt  209
06-18-2007 10:51 AM ET (US)
Hallo!
Check this out!
,
Alice_xa  208
06-15-2007 12:31 PM ET (US)

And some more..
*
Edward_nx  207
06-15-2007 12:31 PM ET (US)
Buon giorno!
Check this out!
*
Elena_pn  206
06-14-2007 09:50 AM ET (US)

At last...
*
Elena_gv  205
06-14-2007 09:50 AM ET (US)

And some more..
*
Lee_lk  204
06-14-2007 09:50 AM ET (US)
Salaam!
Check this out!
*
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  203
06-01-2007 04:58 PM ET (US)
Grayman, thanks for clearing that up. ;-)
Grayman  202
06-01-2007 06:38 AM ET (US)
/m189 (Belatedly) No Beefy, it wasn't. To our stateside friends, lest confusion should arise: 'Baguette' does not rhyme with 'cleave', not even on this side of the pond.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  201
05-27-2007 01:46 PM ET (US)
/m1999 Very funny stuff, Will. Thanks for the link. :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  200
05-26-2007 01:29 PM ET (US)
Those were darn clever, Will. I sent the link to friends.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  199
05-25-2007 11:34 AM ET (US)
apropos ZP190, I came across this. Not exactly the same idea but amusing.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  198
05-17-2007 12:49 AM ET (US)
Ah, yes--Lily Dale NY. Been there several times over the years. It's a spiritualist resort--you can get readings and channelings from mediums. Quaint cottages nestled around a small lake and dates from the turn-of-the-century when spiritualism and sceances were big.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  197
05-16-2007 04:36 PM ET (US)
/m193 Francine, I asked him in class last night. It's in Lily Dale. Sounds like it's some kind of spiritual retreat http://www.angelhouse1.com/. He used to be a prof at Clarion.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  196
05-15-2007 12:08 PM ET (US)
I'm glad you got the experience Francine. The farthest I've ever traveled is Canada! Do you think you'll be going again - maybe you'll take turns going over there and them coming over here?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  195
05-15-2007 04:23 AM ET (US)
No one spoke English, Karin, although the signs were in English as well as Chinese. Odd. The oddest things I ate were vegetables that I couldn't identify and which my hosts did not know the English names for.
Meals in cafes are eaten like at home--food set out in the middle of the table and everyone helps themselves. There are like ten to fifteen entrees set out and lunches are just as lavish. And everything at home and in cafes is made from scratch using fresh ingredients--nothing canned or frozen, no convenenience foods whatsoever--and no desserts after the meals and no snacks in-between-times. No wonder, then, that you don't see any overweight people. At size 12, I was the fattest person I saw.

They seemed a very pragmatic people--nothing neurotic or other-wordly about them--very practical--this world enough for them--and so somehow less interesting. Very family oriented, as well. The difference in culture and thinking I found very intersting, expansive--an educational experience.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  194
05-14-2007 11:26 AM ET (US)
Did you find that a lot of people spoke English? (Of course we expect everyone to!) Also, what's the oddest thing that you ate?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  193
05-11-2007 10:53 PM ET (US)
Arch, did that B&B happen to be in Chatauqua NY? It's a popular resort about 50 minutes from here.

Karin--I didn't do a lot of touristy stuff. But wow, I was impressed by how cheap things were there. We got an hour-long massage for $15 American dollars. We ate in upscale restaurants where you could get a private dining room with a plasma TV and private restroom--for ten of us the entire bill came to $60 american money. We'd all be living like millionaires on our American income if we lived there.

Beijing itself I found to be a rather ugly overcrowded city. But the people are very clean and courteous--low crime, no litter, no thuggish looking or slobby looking people. No one was overweight--very healthy diets and lifestyles. But it just wasn't home, if you know what I mean.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  192
05-09-2007 02:49 PM ET (US)
/m190 Sounds like fun! I'm sure they were glad to have you, I know we miss our families and they're only half the country away.

On a PA note, I found out in class last night (night school, gunna get me a B.A.) that my instructor and his wife run a B&B in the summer months about 50 minutes from Erie. Apparently, he used to be a professor at one of the smaller schools in PA as well after moving from Hawaii shortly after WW2.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  191
05-08-2007 11:29 PM ET (US)
Hey Francine! Sounds like you had a great trip. I'm glad you were able to visit your family. Did you do touristy stuff also?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  190
05-08-2007 10:32 PM ET (US)
Hi guys: didn't abandon y'all. Was gone for 10 days to China to see my son and his family. What a trip! It's like a whole other country or somethin' and they talk real different, couldn't understand a word ;-)
   Really, though, it was an amazing trip. The food is incredible. And my three-year-old granddaughter is cute as a button and smart as a whip. Speaks both languages. I learned one word in Chinese--phonetically it's pronounced nee-how and means hello and/or how are you.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  189
05-08-2007 09:47 AM ET (US)
Grayman, is your deviation from rhyme scheme on ZP194 deliberate?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  188
05-01-2007 09:40 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 05-02-2007 09:22 AM
/m187 Not lazy at all! I'd planned to pass that info along sooner to save everybody else the trouble but it didn't get done.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  187
05-01-2007 08:22 PM ET (US)
/m186 Thanks Sam. I guess I could have done that too but I'm apparently too lazy! I hope everything's all right with Peter and he's just on holiday or something like that.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  186
05-01-2007 06:50 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 05-01-2007 06:55 PM
/m185 This morning, I wrote in to the address supplied, and promptly received the following kind response:

We have identified an exploit in the code that runs the service which is putting our server at risk, so the software has been temporarily removed until the maintainer (Peter Christian) returns to work. This is not an officially supported piece of software so I can't give you a better idea [when it will come back online]. Sorry about this, but do come back and visit soon, and contact Peter with any other queries.

Kind regards,

System Admin
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  185
05-01-2007 12:36 PM ET (US)
Hey kids - I haven't been to Spoonbill recently but when I tried to check it out just now it said the site had been temporarily removed as of today. I tried the regular spoonbill site and our private address but same thing. Does anybody know what's going on?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  184
05-01-2007 08:36 AM ET (US)
/m182, /m183 Thanks for the feedback. To prevent one-person poems (like the couple I've done ;-), I think the best thing might be to allow some maximum number of lines per contribution, with perhaps a default of 2. I'm not sure if/when I'll get around to implementing that, though.

Hey, speaking of not replicating the SB unchanged, I'm delighted to report that somebody besides me finally made a contribution to the Zitipedia! That's the good news. The bad news is that it was a spam bot, and it littered the Zitipedia with links to porn sites. (That's a revenue model for botmasters.)

I've cleaned up all that, but if you want to see what done, you can look on the "History" tab of, e.g., the main page and click on a rev that's attributed to an IP address. (PLEASE don't actually follow any of the porn links, though: that might encourage them; more importantly, sites pointed to by bots are likely to try to install malicious software on your computer to draft it into the bot army--it's kind of a "Borg" thing.)

Anyway, since the Zitipedia has succeeded in attracting exactly zero contributions in the six months-or-so it's been in existence, I had been toying with the idea of shutting it down and reusing its infrastructure for another project. But now that it's finally attracted a contributor, maybe I'll keep it going for a while. ;-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  183
04-30-2007 12:55 PM ET (US)
/m181 I'm ambivalent about consecutive contributions - if you allow them you can end up with a one-person poem, and I'm sure that there are plenty of sites for people to write their own poems. The joy (or otherwise) of alternation is seeing what others do with one's own ideas, frustrating as that may turn out to be. Having said that, there's no point in replicating SB unchanged, so I'm happy to go along with a moderate degree of consecutivisation.
Grayman  182
04-30-2007 05:24 AM ET (US)
/m181 In my herbal opinion, the consecutive lines feature is Ziti's main advantage over Spoonbill. Collaborations with single lines are great and should be used, but allowing a contributor to add a couplet or a whole stanza offers a lot more scope for getting one's ideas across. The poem often ends up with a lot more cohesion. And if you fancy writing a whole poem just for the fun of it, then you can!

m/179 That was the word that came to my mind too Beefy - straight after I looked it up!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  181
04-26-2007 01:42 PM ET (US)
Sorry about that, B. Turns out that I had forgotten to allow consecutive contributions, but my super powers let me do it anyway without even realizing it!

I had given myself super powers for admin reasons, but maybe I'll take them away from myself and give them to a special admin name instead.

Also, I'm thinking of making consecutive contributions the default--does anybody object? I sometimes enjoy the freedom that a pair of lines gives.

Peter seemed to think it was important on the SB to disallow that, but I think we've been having a good experience with it here; in particular, a convention seems to have grown up (which you may have fallen victim to, in this case) of contributing multiple lines in accordance with what the work started with.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  180
04-26-2007 07:44 AM ET (US)
Curious - Ziti 196 starts with two lines from Sam, but it then rejects consecutive contributions - creator's prerogative?
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  179
04-17-2007 08:22 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 04-17-2007 08:22 AM
The word "desuetude" springs to mind when contemplating the Ziti pages
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  178
03-06-2007 06:09 AM ET (US)
Amusing read. Thanks, Karin! I liked, "giving up the goat."
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  177
03-03-2007 04:41 PM ET (US)
I don't know if we've discussed "eggcorns" before - I found this site that I thought was interesting. http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  176
01-29-2007 08:50 AM ET (US)
/m175 I received a message from Howly Ellen via telegram about 190, "A list of new words created by overlapping two words. two + woo = twoo. 100,000 pesos. Come to Santa Poca and put on show. stop"
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  175
01-26-2007 08:51 AM ET (US)
There doesn't seem to be much interest in the current works, so I voted for 188 and 191 to be ended. However, if anybody wants to continue them, that's OK with me.

I guess I'm a little lost on what the concept is on 190. Arch, do you have any idea?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  174
01-14-2007 11:38 PM ET (US)
/m170 I think I lost mine once or twice, but it was early enough in the proces that I was able to put it back together pretty easily. One trick I came up with, though, was to use the "merge game" feature to generate a URL that you could then save as a favorite in your browser; then, you can continue after that point. Gotta warn you though--like playing the game itself, I soon began to do that compulsively. ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  173
01-11-2007 10:49 AM ET (US)
/m172 I'm not all that familiar with Blount but I'm a big fan of the Kael. Have two of her books of movie reviews. She's gone now; alas no other movie critic is in her league IMHO. When I see a movie now I think, hmm--wonder what Kael would have said about it.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  172
01-10-2007 09:13 PM ET (US)
Francine, I think the lines that begin ZP191 are likely by rOy blount (jr). It seems he and Pauline Kael were good friends. (I'm no expert; just what I read on them internets.)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  171
01-09-2007 12:34 PM ET (US)
/m170 I still delve into it occasionally, but I've more or less ground to a halt
Grayman  170
01-09-2007 07:13 AM ET (US)
/m95 Sorry I haven't been around guys - I kind of got into that 'Funny Farm' thang, but of course I only have limited intelligence. Then there was a bug and I lost it all and had to start again, then I got 19 or 20 windows open, but decided to clear all my temporary internet files and lost it all again. Do any of you know what I'm on about?
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  169
01-05-2007 10:42 AM ET (US)
/m165 As Churchill might have put it - Never in the history of Ziti have so many contributed so much with so few deviations from the set scheme :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  168
01-04-2007 01:34 PM ET (US)
/m166 /m167 Yup :-)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  167
01-04-2007 12:08 PM ET (US)
/m166 Agreed. :-)
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  166
01-04-2007 10:51 AM ET (US)
Nice work everyone on z158 :)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  165
12-24-2006 12:12 AM ET (US)
Ho, Ho, Ho! Have a very merry [your holiday here]!

(Sorry that I couldn't come up anything better, but it's really late and my poor corporeal just finished wrapping a bunch of gifts from "Santa"...)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  164
12-23-2006 12:59 PM ET (US)
May your bells be jingled and your stockings fully stuffed.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  163
12-23-2006 10:32 AM ET (US)
God bless us, every one - Beefy Tim
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  162
12-22-2006 08:53 AM ET (US)
Happy Holidays, folks!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  161
12-18-2006 03:29 AM ET (US)
/m160 Thanks, Will ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  160
12-15-2006 04:40 AM ET (US)
Like I mentioned quite some time ago, I voted to end 184, and since no one has added a line since, perhaps some kind soul could put it out of its misery.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  159
12-08-2006 09:17 AM ET (US)
It looks like the Zitimaster zapped the line on 187 submitted by Anon after "Prefer butter in dollops", perhaps because it didn't seem to fit. Anon, if you're reading this, please don't be discouraged and feel free to try out another idea if you like.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  158
12-01-2006 10:54 AM ET (US)
/m157 Ok, Francine, thanks for that roundabout vote of confidence. ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  157
12-01-2006 04:50 AM ET (US)
/m156 Well, Karin--if they had, they would have inserted if before you added your line. And if you don't like your line, you can always delete it or change it. Or am I being too logical? ;-) Actually, your line sounds fine to me.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  156
11-30-2006 11:27 AM ET (US)
I don't really like my last line on 158, if anyone has any suggestions.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  155
11-29-2006 03:28 AM ET (US)
I voted to end 184
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  154
11-29-2006 12:05 AM ET (US)
/m152 I'm actually trying not to get too involved Sam - I've tried to cut back on my internet activities, as you've perhaps noticed. But I couldn't sleep last night, found this article and noticed what it was missing, so I went for it. It was kinda fun.

Your Raven revision project is quite amibitious! You seem to have gotten us off to a good start.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  153
11-28-2006 08:12 PM ET (US)
/m151 /m152 Thanks for the info, kids :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  152
11-28-2006 02:08 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-28-2006 02:10 PM
/m148 Glad to see you getting involved in the wiki thing, K! Wikipedia is very good overall, but it has so many little prose things that could be better that there's plenty there to practice your wiki skills on.

/m151 Right. Another thing to look at is the "Recent Changes" link on the left of the Zitipedia. As we get rolling with it, that will probably become the easiest way to find things that others have just done, so you can add to or change theirs.

Also, I've just put in a revision of The Raven. See its discussion tab for details.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  151
11-28-2006 12:13 PM ET (US)
/m149 Francine, as far as I can tell so far the only poem that was revised was Sam's 10th anniversary poem. At the bottom of the main ZP page you can click "Zitipedia", then click "Revised Works". My revision was to a page of the Wikipedia itself, combining my Wizard of Oz and X-Files interests. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yip_Harburg Have I reconfirmed my total nerddom?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  150
11-28-2006 08:32 AM ET (US)
/m147 I agree!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  149
11-28-2006 08:31 AM ET (US)
/m148 Karin, where would I find that? I can't figure out the Zitipedia. Where does one find the pomes that people are revising?
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  148
11-28-2006 01:47 AM ET (US)
/m141 Well Sam, I actually made an edit to a Wikipedia page. I've thought about doing it a few times but finally got the guts up to go through with it. Hopefully no nastygrams will ensue!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  147
11-27-2006 11:38 PM ET (US)
Good work on 188, Men--I like it.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  146
11-23-2006 10:56 AM ET (US)
I'm glad I got to do the first line for Virginia - over to you contriving rhymesters
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  145
11-18-2006 01:18 AM ET (US)
/m135 Go for it, Karin! Write that children's book. Nothing lost by trying, and something might be gained. That's how I feel about it, anyway--if nothing comes of my efforts, well, at least I had fun trying.

Also, I've been very satisfied with the used books I've purchased through Amazon--was even able to find one that's out-of-print. Some used paperbacks are as cheap as under a dollar.

/m136 Thanks, arch :-)

/m137 I'll look him up, Beefy. Seems creativity is a family trait. But I suspected as much before you told us about your uncle ;-)

/m13nine Good tips, Sam. I use adverbs seldom. And I do try to keep the pages a-turning. I envy King's prolific-ness. How does he do it? Imagination of that sort is a miracle and a mystery.

/m141 I'll plunge into the Zitipedia soon, I promise!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  144
11-17-2006 11:28 AM ET (US)
/m143 No - forgot to hit "enter" - it's there now
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  143
11-17-2006 10:07 AM ET (US)
/m141 Sam, I've had the same experience with a "whack"y tin man on a certain Wiki page (which I've since given up on contributing to).

/m142
b) Have you retracted your line Beefy?
a) Here's how answers prounces it: http://www.answers.com/topic/montpelier-vermont
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  142
11-17-2006 07:13 AM ET (US)
Re ZP158

a) have I got the correct rhyme? I typed "Montpelier Vermont pronounced" into Google and found a lot of sites telling me how to pronounce Vermont!

b) my line works best for British tourists, I'm afraid
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  141
11-16-2006 10:45 PM ET (US)
/m130 Wikipedia is a marvelous thing. There's this, for example. And this. (Look near the bottom--I put that familiar link in.)

Anymore, I go to Wikipedia first for information, then Google for it only if Wikipedia fails me. Although you can't believe absolutely everything you read there, my experience has been that it is very accurate overall. Unlike the general Internet, it's concise and extensively peer-reviewed. Also, like an encyclopedia (and unlike the general Internet), it has a neutral point of view--in theory, at least.

Wikipedia, and the wiki concept in general, are soon to be very big things. (I flatter myself that I'm an "early adopter". ;-) In fact, I think Helen even uses a private one at work. In some ways, I think it takes the Internet to its logical conclusion.

The major drawback of Wikipedia is that, like an encyclopedia, it's a bit dry and boring. But that's the price you have to pay for things like conciceness and a neutral point of view. I've only found one exception; it's unclear to me if the warning at the top of that one is serious or part of the joke.

At the most basic level, editing a wiki page--either the Wikipedia or the Zitipedia, isn't even as complicated as contributing to a SB or ZP pome. Basically, you hit the "edit" tab, change the text, and hit "Save page". You don't even have to select any of the choices at the bottom like you do for a SB/ZP contribution. Getting involved might seem a little scary at first but there's really nothing to be scared of on either a technical or social level. Well-intended additions and corrections seem to persist. Also, the worst thing anybody can do is-undo your change and/or write you a nastygram. I've only had the latter happen once, after I made changes to a page that someone thought they were the little tin god of.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  140
11-16-2006 05:09 PM ET (US)
/m139 Oops! Looks like there's only one of J. K.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  139
11-16-2006 05:04 PM ET (US)
/m130 Great news about the book, F! Keep at it, and it'll happen!

FWIW, I read "On Writing" recently by Stephen King. It turned out to actually be 2/3 "On Stephen King" and only 1/3 "On Writing", but it still had a lot of worthwhile tips in it. You might check it out at your local library (where I got it "On Tape" for free--beats Amazon. ;-)

One thing he said that surprised me was how much he hated adverbs ("he stated surprisedly".) I soon realized, though, how write he was: they almost always read awkwardly (sorry). In fact, I've read a lot of books for small children in the last few years ("he said Seussily"), and I've been surprised by how many of the not-so-good ones have a lot of dopey adverbs that wouldn't even be in a child's vocabulary ("he said intimidatedly".)

One thing that Stephen King didn't say, that I was expecting, was that the key to writing a page-turner is to give the reader something to wonder about. (Then again, maybe he's forgotten how to write page-turners. ;-) It seems so obvious once you know the trick. I've read all the Harry Potter books, and, at the risk of spoiling a little of the magic, I'm always amazed at how systematically and cleverly J. K. Rowlings does that on every single page. So, be sure to give your reader lots to wonder about!

/m137 I can't say I'm familiar with him, but I'll look him up. Anyway, I'm just glad to hear he wasn't that "Lord of the Flies" guy!
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  138
11-16-2006 12:16 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-16-2006 12:22 PM
/m137 Thanks for the info Beefy. I don't remember coming across "The Silver Sword" before but I definitely will look for it. The subject brings to mind another book I really enjoyed as a girl - "The Endless Steppe". It's a true story of a young Jewish girl from Poland who was deported w/her family to Siberia during the war. It's perhaps not as emotional as "The Diary of Anne Frank" but I found it fascinating to read the firsthand account of a girl my age coping with the ordeal.

And thanks for bringing up "The Phantom Tollbooth" yesterday. I hadn't thought about it in so long and your reference prompted me to spend some really enjoyable time remembering the amazing wordplay, etc.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  137
11-16-2006 06:45 AM ET (US)
/m134 Not that well known! In fact, he may not have been heard of at all over there. At risk of blowing such anonymity as I have, I'll tell you that his name was Ian Serraillier. His best-known work was "The Silver Sword", a story about Polish children separated from their parents in WW2. It was televised over here in the 60s (I think), and has just been republished for its 50th anniversary. I've just reread it and it still comes across very well to my mind - of course, I may be biased. He and his wife also co-edited the New Windmill series of books which were reprints of classic books for the school market.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  136
11-15-2006 04:11 PM ET (US)
I've had pretty good luck with the used books on Amazon, most of the ones I've bought as such have been from second-hand book stores. I seem to remember liking The Phantom Toolbooth quite a bit, though I haven't read it since I was probably eight.

Best wishes, Francine! I have no doubt in your abilities :)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  135
11-15-2006 01:06 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-15-2006 01:08 PM
/m134 F, thanks for the suggestion. I think I might check it out. One of my nieces in particular likes to read so after I reread some of my old favorites I could pass them on to her. Have you been satisfied with the quality of the used books?

I still have my idea for a children's book featuring my dogs but I just haven't followed through. Hopefully I'll let myself be motivated by your example, Francine!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  134
11-15-2006 12:22 PM ET (US)
Thanks, kids.
   That's interesting that your uncle was a well-known author, Beefy. In the interests of anonymity, I won't ask his name. It wasn't C.S. Lewis, was it?
  Karin, the age range is from about 8-12.
  I never read The Phantom Tollbooth but now I think I will. Karin--if you want to reread it, Amazon.com sells used books, some pretty cheap. Lately that's how I buy mine.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  133
11-15-2006 11:41 AM ET (US)
/m132 The Phantom Tollbooth! One of my favorite books from childhood, and I do wish I still had my copy so I could read it again.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  132
11-15-2006 11:26 AM ET (US)
/m130 Fingers crossed, F. My late uncle was a fairly well-known author of children's books, and to my mind they're still a good read for so-called grownups, as also the Philip Pullman trilogy, Harry Potter, and The Phantom Tollbooth (although that list may say more about my mental age and reading tastes than about the books). Keep us posted on progress
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  131
11-15-2006 11:13 AM ET (US)
/m130 That's exciting news on the children's book Francine! I hope it works out well for you. What age group are you writing for?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  130
11-15-2006 02:28 AM ET (US)
/m127 That's 'merely' an illusion on your part--a 'reflection' of your British prejudice. Okay, I'm done with the lame puns ;-)
  Getting back to 'malt' I gave it some more thought and recalled that in the forties and fifties soda fountains and ice cream parlors were often referred to as 'malt shops.'
   Actually, a chocolate malt or chocolate malted sounds good right about now. Yummy.
   To change the subject--sorry, Sam, that I haven't checked into the Zitipedia thing in more depth or used it as of yet. Frankly, I never used Wikipedia, either, and am not familiar with what that whole 'wiki' thing entails. I'm not computer savvy, as you know.
  I've been busy as of late. A literary agent liked the synopsis of the children's novel I sent and has requested to see my not-quite-completed manuscript. Keep your fingers crossed for me, guys and gals--and send good vibes my way!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  129
11-14-2006 11:43 AM ET (US)
I'm not wild about my last line on 158 - if anyone has something better, I'd be happy to change it
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  128
11-14-2006 09:31 AM ET (US)
/m126 I wasn't able to find a side-by-side comparison either--though I'm still hopeful that it might have such a thing. In any case, we'll pretty-much have to live within the confines of the MediaWiki system because it's such a complex thing that modifying it probably would take more time than I can spend.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  127
11-14-2006 07:10 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-14-2006 11:39 AM
/m122 and for a nation that prides itself on pronouncing its "r"s, how come you only give "mirror" one syllable? :-)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  126
11-13-2006 11:41 PM ET (US)
/m125 Yes, I did notice that. But it seems as though you have to switch back and forth between them. Is there some way to actually view them side by side that I'm just not picking up on?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  125
11-13-2006 11:32 PM ET (US)
Nope, I won't be adding that--because it's already got it!

The MediaWiki gizmo allows you to compare any two versions of a given page. I've encouraged users to start a modification of a work by putting an exact rendition of the original text in as the first version. If everybody does that, the original can always be compared with any newer version.

You can try this out on the revised 186; just click on its "history" tab and go from there.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  124
11-13-2006 11:17 AM ET (US)
Sam, I just thought of something else - will you be adding a feature to the Zitipedia where you will be able to see the original and edited poems side by side, so you can more easily see the changes that were made?
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  123
11-13-2006 11:15 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-13-2006 11:16 AM
/m118 Ditto, Sam. :-)

/m122 Yes! There are some British actors who do a very good American accent, but there is a Brit on "CSI" (can't think of her name offhand, she's the blonde detective) who does probably the worst American accent I've ever heard - "r's" all over the place. Of course, it works both ways - there are some Americans who excel at a British accent, but more often than not you hear something like a low-budget local radio station commercial with faux British accents that make you want to slap someone. And then of course, there's Madonna....
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  122
11-13-2006 06:28 AM ET (US)
/m120 The corollary is to listen to amateur actors over here trying to do an American accent and putting "r"s into all kinds of words that don't have them!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  121
11-13-2006 03:41 AM ET (US)
Now that I think of it, those of us who live south of the Mason-Dixon line would also drop the final 'r.' As in, "Ah do believe Loretta owns an Irish-Settah--honeychile."
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  120
11-13-2006 03:28 AM ET (US)
Grayman--a malt here is usually interpreted as a malted milkshake--a gloopy ice cream confection that has malt added to it. Malt whiskey is also known here but Americans hearing 'a malt' would first think 'malted milkshake.'
   I enjoy these differences and variables while interacting with our British friends here. For instance, Beefy's insistence on rhyming words that end in an 'er' with words that end in an 'a.' As in '..etter'--'Loretta.'
   My question, why do you guys think the words end in an 'r'? So that the end letter can be dropped? I'm razzing you, of course. We no longer pronounce the 'k' in knife and knight, either :-)
Grayman  119
11-13-2006 02:46 AM ET (US)
/m116 Er... yes, I was "cleverly playing both sides of the street" with the malt line.

Well no, not really. I don't even know what malted milk is. I don't think we have such a commodity over here. I guess it's milk with malt in it? For us, malt is malt whisky, as opposed to grain whisky or malt/grain blends. (Also, we spell whisky without an 'e' in it.) So then - that line's gonna look a bit daft to any future ziti-reading Americans isn't it?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  118
11-13-2006 12:38 AM ET (US)
/m117 Good work, Sam :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  117
11-12-2006 11:33 PM ET (US)
This is to officially launch The Zitipedia, which, as some of you have already seen, is the new wiki feature of The Ziti Project. Feel free to wiki away.

Also, many thanks to Zach G. for donating Zeep, the ZP's new mascot, who now greets you on the home page. (According to Zach, he's holding an orange, not an apple; I'll fix the colors later.)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  116
11-10-2006 09:25 AM ET (US)
It took me a minute to figure out "malt" in 158, G. 'Round here, that would commonly refer to the entirely wholesome "malted milk" that one could get in Salt Lake City! I realized, though, that you mean malt liquor or malted ale or some such.

So, is the "malted milk" sense of it familiar in the UK? Or maybe you were cleverly playing both sides of the street with that one.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  115
11-06-2006 01:23 PM ET (US)
I voted to end 185 as F seemed to have rounded it off nicely (plus, Halloween is o'er)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  114
11-06-2006 01:16 PM ET (US)
/m111 Abso-bleedin'-lutely, but whither next.

TG is probably too friendly with Roland to be welcome on ZP - we don't want F in permanent rant mode :-)

/m106 I completely missed the double/triple rhyme thing - but I guess that's always the risk on SB - at least on ZP you can try to specify your aim, and supplement it through the message board
Grayman  113
11-06-2006 07:25 AM ET (US)
In 184, I decided that as a jet-setter is not the same as an Irish Setter, then I wasn't really re-using a previous rhyme word. Feel free to disagree!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  112
11-04-2006 01:28 AM ET (US)
Karin and Sam--your posts remind me of that Sartre quote, "Hell is other people."
  The jobs I've had were always ruined for me by personalites plus I tend to be hypersensitive {as my past rants attest to, hehe} and unable to deal with stress of any kind--which means I'm darn glad I don't have to work at an outside job at the moment. We own one of those old Victorian homes that are two-story with an upstairs apartment. So the rent we get covers our mortgage, which means I don't have to bring in a steady second income. The downside is that we have to deal with tenants. Our last tenant, whose father was a lawyer, sued us for the entire amount of the security deposit. We held back a portion of it due to dirtiness and damages. So, we had to attend a hearing--and ended up spending more than if we'd just given him what he wanted. Arrgh!
  Anyway, whatever your situation, life has a way of biting you in the ass now and again.
   Karin, per your disgruntlement with SB. I'm reminded of the time that loaf deleted my lines for no good reason. Really ticked me off, but I ended up returning to SB and adding a line here and there now and then. For no other reason than that I enjoy contributing to collaborative poetry sites and only have found SB and ZP. But like I said, when things get off-kilter, I just tend to not add lines until there's a pome or two that tempts me or if the mood strikes me.
  I'm proud of all of us that we've hung around this long and kept adding to these sites. Unthunk has its problems too, like ZP--not enough contributors and not enough of us contributing frequently enough. But I've even learned to accept that state of affairs. If ZP or Unthunk are in a slump, I check into other sites I enjoy or play a computer game.
  Frankly, I'm kinda glad that there's not a whole lot of action on these sites anymore--I'm no longer as hooked and tempted to spend a great deal of time on them, which is good--I've been somewhat busy lately and have been working on a book.
   But I don't think I'll ever abandon our dear ZP and such like sites; I've met some wonderful people here. What is interesting to me is that though I've never met any of you in person, I've gotten to know you all during the past years in ways that are somehow more revelatory or soul-baring than people I've met in the flesh--through online dialog and poetry and whack comments, people's personalities and talents are displayed and highlighted in ways that don't happen in 'real' life. I've found the experience stimulating, fascinating, and 'educational'.
  Speaking of which, I kind of get a kick out of this--I don't know what any of you look like, yet you all have appeared in my nightly dreams a time or two! [And no, none of them were erotic!]
  Okay, I've rambled on enough. Anyway, hang in there, all of ya!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  111
11-03-2006 11:19 PM ET (US)
So Beefy - did I figure out where you were going in Austin?

(BTW, feel free to invite TG to the ZP if you see him sometime.)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  110
11-03-2006 02:13 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-03-2006 02:13 PM
/m109 Helen, I'm sorry it didn't go as well as you had hoped. Those people must indeed be dullards to not have been amused by it!

Personalities usually do seem to be the trouble at any job. I've rarely had a job where there wasn't at least one "rotten egg" to spoil things. Working at home I don't have much contact with my colleagues, but I do deal with the public and that can be extremely trying. I have a side business selling sterling silver jewelry and I would like to do that solely, but I can't give up the security of my regular (albeit small) paycheck during the time it would take to make my jewelry business really take off. So for now I just plug away at this job.
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  109
11-03-2006 12:47 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-03-2006 01:30 PM
/m108 Thanks, Karin. The job itself is pretty good, but most of the problems revolve around the various personalities. That's the heck of it: going somewhere else would just bring on a different, though basically similar, collection of personalities to deal with. So I guess I'll continue to "do time" here.

I read the pome that you folks provided at the occasion. (BTW, thanks to all, and thanks for starting that, Sam--you're so sweet. :-) I can't say that it got the big laughs I was hoping for, but then again, given the dullards I work with that's nothing to be surprised about. ;-) However, I was surprised that "I often leave my seat" seemed to get the biggest laugh, and I didn't think that one amounted to much. But maybe that's the nature of "stand-up" comedy.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  108
11-03-2006 11:50 AM ET (US)
Well I hope Helen really does enjoy her job. I wish I could say the same for mine. :(
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  107
11-03-2006 11:29 AM ET (US)
/m103 As I look at 186 again, it was interesting to see that lines from all three of you were critical! The "in my prime" and "doing time" things were a neat intro and--reversed--conclusion. And, of course, there's the irony angle of "But really, guys, I love it here!"
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  106
11-03-2006 08:05 AM ET (US)
/m105 Actually, I wasn't even thinking of "cash" in the Johnny sense, though that would have fit very nicely with Nashville, now that you mention it! Actually, I was thinking of cash in the money sense, thus "blow your whole wad" would be something like "Or you'll find that you've got little cash (nill)".

I kindda developed a fetish for double and triple rhymes after my Gilbert & Sullivan binge a couple of years ago. The SB's current Orange started out with those: Apsley came up with "balcony/talcum free", which seemed like yet another Apsley "masterpiece" until I realized that it was actually a bad triple rhyme. Then I came up with the exact triple rhyme "aria/Sorry...uh.." and the contrived "orchestra/o'er stressed bra", both of which were more to the point. Then the triple rhyme thing got dropped--it's hard to sustain.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  105
11-03-2006 12:27 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-03-2006 12:28 AM
/m104 Sam, I don't know that it was so obtuse - it's just that I'm not a country music fan so it didn't occur to me. In fact, even after I read your post it took me a couple minutes to realize what you meant. :-)

/m103 Well, you did the lion's share of it! And it's very good, by the way.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  104
11-02-2006 11:48 PM ET (US)
Darn, I was trying to set you folks up for "cash/nill" for Nashville in 158. Admittedly, though, that was pretty obtuse. :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  103
11-02-2006 02:31 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 11-02-2006 02:33 PM
Thanks, Kids, for the help on 186! I got on a roll after what you guys put in (the irony angle was key) so I took the liberty of finishing it up.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  102
11-02-2006 02:29 PM ET (US)
/m101 Well done--you gotta use every resource you can on that thang!
Grayman  101
10-30-2006 09:19 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-30-2006 09:19 AM
/m95 I've not admitted so far that I've attempted that Funny Farm thang - especially as I have only opened up a feeble five windows. OneLook has already helped though! Cheers!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  100
10-23-2006 02:14 PM ET (US)
/m99 and, two or so hours later, several more clues and a new window - yippee!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  99
10-23-2006 12:13 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-23-2006 12:34 PM
/m96 pretty much stuck where I was when I last posted - will try more tomorrow. Got it from a so-called "friend" - she and her husband, both trivia/quiz freaks, had nearly finished it, and offered help, but I've been too stubborn so far - but thank you for the OneLook hint - it's given me one more answer straight away :-)

184 is shaping well - I'd actually envisioned rhyming triplets but neglected to say so - but I like the way it's turned out
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  98
10-20-2006 03:00 PM ET (US)
/m97 It was perfect--don't change it!
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  97
10-20-2006 01:16 PM ET (US)
/m96 I was awake around 3:00 a.m. debating whether to pull the last line as soon as I logged on today. Perhaps I'll just let it be. After all, who will know or care in 50 years.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  96
10-20-2006 12:20 AM ET (US)
I apologize for my crappy line in 184, but scansion (or is that 'scatology'--I can never remember) demanded it. Next, to make things worse, I'll share with you that it brought to mind an Ecclesiastes sortta thing: "A time to crap, a time to flush".

Again, sorry.

I also apologize for filching that lame Python bit about saying rude things just so you can apologize for them: it wasn't funny then, and it isn't funny now. Sorry.

And I apologize for that last apology.

Luckily, Will managed to dovetail into it a sophisticated and urbane way using the polite phrase "the men's room". <farting sound>

And I apologize for the previous sound.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  95
10-19-2006 11:36 PM ET (US)
/m94 Indeed--maybe that thing has the makings of a Rorschach test! Did you ever get all the way through it?

Turns out that I worked vigorously on it for several days (wasting a great deal of time, per your warning). I used every resource I could think of including Google, Wikipedia, OneLook, plus a couple of friends--infecting them in the process without even trying to! One friend pointed out a neat feature of OneLook that I didn't know: its concept search. For example, you can search on "???? ???:cow" to get phrases that match that pattern relating to cows.

I eventually got all panels opened up except for the four corners, though I ended up accidently cheating in one instance. (I know, I know..."How do you 'accidentally' cheat?" It's a long story.) I discovered that the farther I got out from the center, the harder it became, and the sparser my answers got. At some point, I was pretty-much stalled, so I decided to explicitly cheat via a thread of answers I found on digg.com. Much slapping of head ensued. (No, not the kind you think, Francine...) However, there were many things I had no chance on. For example, I had never heard of several items on the BB page, and I'm not sure there was any way to round them up via web resources. So I think I started my cheating at about the right time; as W. C. Fields said, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit--there's no use being a damn fool about it."

Anyway, that was a lot of fun, Beefy--thanks for pointing it out. (BTW, how did you find it?) Ever the plagiarist, I'm since been resisting the urge to create something like that of my own. Which would, of course, be a much greater waste of time. ;-)
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  94
10-12-2006 02:16 PM ET (US)
/m92 Mine is

  - - X X -
  - - X X -
  X X X X X
  X X X X -
  - X X X -

Interesting how comparatively little overlap there is - probably a psychological insight there!
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  93
10-12-2006 02:13 PM ET (US)
/m91 I didn't recall that id had been discussed, and I thought that another "City" ending might get repetitious, but I've changed it - but note that "Oklahoma" now only has three syllables!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  92
10-11-2006 11:52 PM ET (US)
/m86 Looks like 182 was ended by pending votes from Francine and me.

/m90 I'm up to 13 now; here's a coarse view of my "minimap".

  - X - - -
  X X X X -
  X X X X -
  X X X - -
  - X - - -

Does yours look radically different? I haven't gotten any section completely filled in yet, but I'm close on a couple.

/m91 Sorry to ask this, Will, but can you edit out the URL so that the "public" (assuming the ZP ever gets one!) won't find out about Boonspill?
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  91
10-11-2006 07:09 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-12-2006 12:19 AM
Beefy, there was consensus at our previous discussion site (BSpill QT) that the state capitol name would always come at the end of the first line. You may want to change your contribution; if not, it's okay by me.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  90
10-11-2006 01:29 PM ET (US)
/m88 I've got 16 sections open, but a LOT of gaps
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  89
10-11-2006 01:26 PM ET (US)
/m86 I did (thank goodness for whatever it is that makes the machine remember what I'd typed in previously, because I certainly didn't) - and the poem was declared ended - I never told it to, honest!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  88
10-09-2006 11:38 PM ET (US)
/m80 Hey, that's fun. With some help from a young corporeal, I've got 9 sections opened up now, but I'm still missing several things on the first one!
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  87
10-09-2006 11:44 AM ET (US)
/m85 Francine, those are lots of fun! Thanks for sharing.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  86
10-07-2006 10:17 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-07-2006 11:34 PM
Sorry, Beefy, that I've accidentally deleted your last line on 182. Unfortunately, I don't have a gizmo to purposely un-delete it, so could you just add it back?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  85
10-07-2006 10:18 AM ET (US)
Don't know if anyone has seen this site. 30 second condensed versions of famous movies starring bunnies. And they manage to squeeze in the major highlights. If you're looking for a pick-me-up :-)
http://www.angryalien.com/
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  84
10-06-2006 11:56 AM ET (US)
m/82 m/83 Thanks, guys.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  83
10-06-2006 11:06 AM ET (US)
/m81 In re Beefy's 'Funny Farm', here's some more information:

http://tinyurl.com/l39cz

Warning! Don't follow the link if you intend to figure out the game yourself.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  82
10-05-2006 12:13 PM ET (US)
Just type in your guess and hit Enter. A correct guess may well open up new links. A correct guess at the edge of the page opens the next page, which you access by clicking on the map. Good luck!!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  81
10-05-2006 11:12 AM ET (US)
Hi, Beefy and welcome back. I tried playing the Funny Farm game but it gave no instructions. Couldn't figure out how to play it.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  80
10-05-2006 10:42 AM ET (US)
The other reason I took a while to get back is that a so-called friend sent me the link following puzzle:

www.shygypsy.com/farm

WARNING!!! Do not open this unless you can afford to waste vast quantities of time - I've spent most of the last three days on it and have not advanced even halfway
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  79
10-05-2006 08:51 AM ET (US)
/m77 Welcome back, B! You came back just in time to save us from Beefless!

/m78 So you haven't read the Harry Potter series yet? ;-)

Actually, I put a redirect into the home page of the old site, which has the effect of automagically* sending you to the new site. That causes a few seconds of delay, though, so you might want to adjust your bookmark to point directly to the new site. (I guess your browser could have already done that for you, but I doubt that it's that smart.)

*see 182
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  78
10-05-2006 07:13 AM ET (US)
/m58 - My bookmark automatically adopted the new location - how did it know?
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  77
10-05-2006 07:04 AM ET (US)
/m64 I'm back - after a vacation in places where I had no internet connection (nor, for that matter, much time)

Will try to resume prolificity
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  76
10-01-2006 09:15 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 10:51 AM
/m72 Sorry about that, Will. I had put you into the boonspill group from the start, but had done so mistakenly as "Will_H" (with underscore, like your QT persona) rather than as "Will H" (with space, like your ZP persona). I think I've fixed that now in both the ZP's machinery and FAQ, so please try again.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  75
10-01-2006 05:38 AM ET (US)
Frankly, as far as I can see, all of them except 158 need to be put out of their misery ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  74
10-01-2006 05:33 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 05:35 AM
I voted to abandon 180. The meter went awry, plus no one seems interested in adding to it.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  73
10-01-2006 02:40 AM ET (US)
Outrageous, Will! As far as I'm concerned you are a member! In fact, you are one of my favorite human beans :-) [And might I add, that puts you in a very exclusive group.]
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  72
09-30-2006 11:12 PM ET (US)
I might have contributed to 182, but, "because (I am) not a member of the 'boonspill' group", I was thwarted. Never mind.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  71
09-26-2006 01:19 AM ET (US)
/m70 I know what you mean, Sam. I've tried to interest friends as well. Guess SB and ZP are what you might call an acquired taste. I remember when you tried to lure us to SB and I thought, nah. Then I tried it and thought, hey, this is kinda fun!
Whether we get more contributors or not, we'll keep plugging away as time and inclination allow.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  70
09-24-2006 11:40 PM ET (US)
/m67 Well, I came up with a little something for 182. However, I didn't take the time to figure out for sure whether it fits the established pattern (if any ;-).

/m68 FWIW, I guess I look at running the thing as being my primary contribution these days. That said, my corporeal has tried to interest some of his supposedly literate, creative friends in it. They're folks who have a good sense of humor and enjoy Pythonesque nonsense. Now, you'd think at least one of 'em would try it out just for curiosity or whatever. But he hasn't had a lick of success so far. So my personal theory is that he's just a terrible salesman. (Then again, it took me quite a few plugs on GW to get Karin and you interested in the SB, so I guess I'm not much better. ;-)

One thing I've found, though--and you folks might have had a similar experience--is that most people don't think they can write poetry--even the low sort we create here and on the SB. So they never even give it a chance. :-(

/m69 'salright, I understand. :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  69
09-24-2006 07:22 PM ET (US)
Those weren't rants I deleted, just ramblings. I was pretty tired last nite when I posted them.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  68
09-24-2006 02:35 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 09-24-2006 07:19 PM
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  67
09-24-2006 01:38 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 09-24-2006 07:19 PM
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  66
09-22-2006 08:14 AM ET (US)
/m64 Darn, I was hoping all those lines I added to 182 would count towards my total. ;-)

Actually, I'm kindda surprised that nobody but Helen has gotten interested in 182 so far: it's a fairly easy concept, which usually is a plus when it comes to attracting contributors.

Anyway, I'll see what I can come up with to get things rolling again. And maybe Mr. B will show up again soon.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  65
09-22-2006 08:06 AM ET (US)
Francine, you're latest line on ziti180 was spot on, here's a clip from Napoleon Dynamite, enjoy :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixsZy2425eY
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  64
09-22-2006 01:56 AM ET (US)
/m63 Helen, I've heard your plaint and have added some lines. Maybe you could convince Sam to do likewise. If it gives you any consolation, SB seems to have been in the doldrums lately as well; not much action there, either. Where's Beefy these days? He's always prolific. Beefy, Beefy! Where are you? Come out, come out, wherever you are!
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  63
09-21-2006 01:53 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-21-2006 03:52 PM
/m58 Looks like you scared 'em off by changing the URL to zitiproject.org, Sam. Nice goin'...
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  62
09-18-2006 09:04 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-18-2006 11:31 PM
/m59 I think the 'Anon' login window is fixed now.

/m60 Shouldn't that be "Deleted by the authoress"? (My corporeal just hates it when I question his manhood. ;-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  61
09-18-2006 11:18 AM ET (US)
/m59 I had forgotten to mention that everybody will need to log in again. The mini-login page the comes up after contributing as "Anon" is broken, so I'll fix that--thanks for pointing that out, G. Meanwhile, the login link on the home page can be used.

Under the hood, the new and old site are completely separate since they use different web hosting services. However, the new site is a clone of the old one, so they should look and work the same--except that the old one won't accept contributions anymore. I'll completely shut down the old site soon, after we do a little more proving of the new one.
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  60
09-18-2006 11:12 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 09-18-2006 11:13 AM
Grayman  59
09-18-2006 07:57 AM ET (US)
Sam, the new location's working fine, but of course none of us are logged in now - and your recent 'Login and try again' fix won't work, presumably because the link doesn't exist any more. (Easy enough to get around it by closing down the browser and starting it up again.)

Ziti is still there in the old location as well!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  58
09-17-2006 02:29 PM ET (US)
/m57 It's back online now, but at a new address: zitiproject.org. Its new incarnation seems to work OK for me but if you run into any glitches, please report them to me here.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  57
09-16-2006 06:27 PM ET (US)
/m54 As predicted, the ZP is offline now, but should be running again soon.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  56
09-15-2006 11:58 AM ET (US)
/m55 Thanks for that one, Sam. I'd completely forgotten it. Made me chuckle, too.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  55
09-14-2006 11:39 PM ET (US)
Here's an old one from the SB I thought of today that makes me laugh every time I read it.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  54
09-14-2006 08:10 AM ET (US)
My friends at Iowegian are making some changes to their dspGuru site, so the ZP (which lives there) soon will be offline for maybe a couple of days. Meanwhile, you can continue to use it; just don't be surprised if it suddenly stops working.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  53
09-08-2006 07:29 AM ET (US)
/m52 no prob Francince, that's fine with me.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  52
09-07-2006 10:57 PM ET (US)
/m51 Well, don't think I'll be making a trip to the video store, Arch. So how's about we just take the pome wherever it will go and just get silly with it rather than adhere to the Napoleon Dynamite theme? If that's okay with you?
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  51
09-07-2006 08:14 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-07-2006 10:46 AM
/m50 & /m49 This one might require a trip to the video store, Napoleon Dynamite is a movie that did well at Sundance a few years ago and become quite popular with younger generations (now, I'm not calling anyone old here!!! I love movies from all eras -- That Lana Turner was a looker in her day). Here's the IMDB link:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0374900/

I found it somewhat reminiscent of a Wes Anderson film, the humor can be obtuse.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  50
09-07-2006 06:45 AM ET (US)
/m49 I'm glad it's not just me :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  49
09-07-2006 01:02 AM ET (US)
Arch, regarding 180, I clicked on the link and was whooshed over to the familiar William Black poem. But the Napoleon Dynamite reference had me stumped so I did a Google search and checked out some site that listed movies. I'll need a little more info from you on what it means to parody a poem in a Napoleon Dynamite style. The reference eludes me.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  48
08-30-2006 09:44 PM ET (US)
/m47 No worries, Helen - check out the Boonspill QT & see what you think of my guess!
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  47
08-30-2006 08:13 PM ET (US)
/m46 Sorry I missed that, Karin. Actually, I'd be interested to see what you've come up with, but you might want to post it to Boonspill so that future ZPers (if any ;-) won't run onto it here.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  46
08-30-2006 02:48 PM ET (US)
Hi Helen & Sam, we missed you while your corporeal was on vacation. Sorry you guys didn't get to go also, but hopefully he had a good time.

Helen, I notice you didn't reply to my little note to you on /m41. Was that an oversight or were you just trying to tell me something?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  45
08-30-2006 01:53 PM ET (US)
/m40 I had been thinking that ending it would be a good idea, too.

Sorry that I've left the 'Walrus' one hanging around for so long, F, but I'll try to get it closed off soon. Anyway, the ZP now appears in Google, though only grudgingly. For example if you Google on "Helen Owly", you get only a few pages. However, if you Google on "Helen Owly site:dspguru.com", you'll see more more. So I think it's digested the entire ZP by now.

Speaking of Googling (now that "Google" is officially a verb), I wish I had recorded how I first found the SB, but, of course, there was no way to know at that moment how much I would come to enjoy it. However, I know that I found it while Googlewhacking, probably using a pair of big words of the kind Apsley and Roland like throw out to impress themselves. I don't remember how I found Googlewhack--maybe from an NPR story, I'm not sure.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  44
08-30-2006 01:44 PM ET (US)
/m42 /m43 I think he should have taken at least Helen; then, maybe she wouldn't be so cranky. ;-)
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  43
08-30-2006 01:40 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-30-2006 08:17 PM
/m23 Maybe Sam should thank us for putting up with it for the last two years! It only took him an hour or so to fix it once he finally got interested in it.
Helen OwlyPerson was signed in when posted  42
08-30-2006 01:37 PM ET (US)
/m19 Turns out he wouldn't let us go! We were told that if he let Sam and me go, he'd have to let asdf go; then he'd hear no end of "Are we there yet, are we there yet?" So all three of us got left out.

Even so, I think Sam somehow managed to take a peak at the SB and the ZP once, but he didn't contribute anything.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  41
08-26-2006 11:49 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-26-2006 11:51 PM
/m39 & /m40 I agree and I ended it. Now if only I could come up with something to add to the others!

/m38 & /m37 Beefy, over here the equivalent of that would probably be "junk in the trunk". As far as Pluto's demotion goes, the letters from Messrs. Walters & Wright remind of those Monty Python letters from BBC viewers. I'll vote with Francine - to me Pluto will always be both a planet and Mickey Mouse's dog. I have to say though I don't mind too much about Xena - but I suppose if it had been added then decades from now folks would be attached to it too.

Here's a neat little story about the upside of today's technology: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060825/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_burglary.

And finally - Helen, I think I may have worked out a small bit of the mystery surrounding your identity. Shall I post it here and see what you think? I'd send you a personal e-mail but you don't have a link from Ziti.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  40
08-26-2006 10:22 PM ET (US)
Beefy, I vote we end it. I like the ZP theme of it and anything else would seem extraneous.
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  39
08-26-2006 07:47 AM ET (US)
I think we've about exhausted the ZP element of 178 - we can either end it or branch out into non-ZP figures - whaddya reckon?
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  38
08-26-2006 07:34 AM ET (US)
/m26 /m28 Thanks Grayman and F - must pay closer attention (smacks back of head) - fixed.
/m29 et seq. My wife has a saying (usually applied on espying someone of a portly disposition) "It must be jelly, 'cause jam don't shake like that"
/m37 Two letters in The Times today:

"Sir, Admirers of Holst will rejoice at the demotion of Pluto. Now the Planets Suite will once again be complete.

MICHAEL P. WALTERS
Portrush, Co Antrim

Sir, After all this time it seems that Pluto was only a Mickey Mouse planet.

PETER WRIGHT
West Kilbride, Ayrshire"

AND we've been denied Xena - what is the Universe coming to?
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  37
08-26-2006 01:04 AM ET (US)
/m36 Pluto will always be a planet to me. I refuse to succumb. What's next? Pluto is no longer a Disney dog?
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  36
08-26-2006 12:51 AM ET (US)
Does anyone join me in weeping for Pluto, the erstwhile and somewhat beloved ninth planet of our solar system? It just sems wrong to let him go. Now what mnemonic device will schoolchildren use to learn the planets?
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  35
08-25-2006 10:54 AM ET (US)
That's good to know! Yes, it was ok. I'm coming down with a cold so it was kind of tough, but it helped that for some reason, there were only a total of 7 people in the second school! That's including the instructor, myself and the other students. A lot of people are away on vacation now so the attendance was kind of sparse to begin with, but I've never seen that happen before. I'm sure your audience was a bit larger though. :-)
Grayman  34
08-25-2006 10:20 AM ET (US)
/m33 Did it go OK? I had the Instruction talk! And don't worry - I hardly ever forget my trousers.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  33
08-24-2006 10:48 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-24-2006 11:06 AM
/m32 LOL! But I still had to look up singlet - I forgot that's what we call an undershirt or t-shirt. Anyway, let us know when you'll be in our neighborhood and we'll have the brother who does the scheduling put you on the incoming speakers list (although we'd best inform him to have a discreet word with you about your wardrobe). :-) P.S. I have talk #4 on the school tonight - my nerves are a bit dodgy.
Grayman  32
08-24-2006 03:42 AM ET (US)
/m29 & /m31 Nerdish research is a wonderful thing. I also wondered what defines marmalade. We tend to use 'preserve' to mean a superior kind of jam, ie: one that costs more and is sold in a nicer jar. I didn't realize you guys had jam over there though - I thought it was always called jelly. And you're right Karin, what you call jello, we call jelly. Fortunately the chain stops there; we don't have a 'jello'!

My favourite discrepancy between American English and English English is the case of male clothing: what you call a 'vest' and 'pants' we call a 'waistcoat' and 'trousers'. To us, vest and pants are both items of underwear, (singlet and underpants). If I ever give a public talk in your congregation Karin, I've really got to get that right ... !
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  31
08-23-2006 08:04 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-23-2006 08:45 PM
/m30 You're welcome Francine. You know I have a nerdish love of doing research! No random musing is safe from me. ;-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  30
08-23-2006 07:27 PM ET (US)
/m2nine Ah, that clears it up. Thanks for doing the research, Karin :-)
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  29
08-23-2006 01:50 PM ET (US)
/m26 & /m27 If I remember correctly, don't you Brits use the word "jelly" in a different sense than we would use, i.e. jam, fruit spread, etc.? I almost think I've heard the term applied to what we would call jello.

Interesting question on the jam/jelly/marmalade diferences. I found this:

"True" jellies are smooth textured and made from fruit juice, such as grape jelly.
Jams contain both fruit juice and piece of the fruit's flesh, strawberry jam for example. Jams are also called preserves.
Marmalades are jellies that contain some of the fruit's rind or peel. Citrus fruits are commonly used in marmalades.
Fruit butters are sweet spreads made of fruit cooked to a paste and then lightly sweetened, such as apple butter.

Thanks for bringing it up Francine - I always love to learn something new, about any topic. :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  28
08-23-2006 12:47 PM ET (US)
/m26 Beefy, besides the Rley typo, your line on 172 doesn't follow the rhyme scheme, if you'd like to correct.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  27
08-23-2006 12:36 PM ET (US)
/m26 Interesting you bring up 'jam.' Just yesterday I was in the grocery store and as I passed the jelly aisle and scanned the labels I found myself wondering aloud, "What distinguishes jam from jelly from preserves from marmalade?" All are used. It's one of life's imponderables.
Grayman  26
08-23-2006 09:13 AM ET (US)
Quick Beefy! ziti172: You can change 'Rley' to 'Riley' before anyone notices. If you want to, of course.

For the Americans among us who may not realize, (although I think you all speak the Queen's English fluently), ziti173: Jam = Jelly
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  25
08-19-2006 09:41 AM ET (US)
/m24 Hee-hee! Good one.
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  24
08-19-2006 02:26 AM ET (US)
ZP 158- Somehow, I was hoping that 'Helena' and 'handbasket' would appear consecutively.
Grayman  23
08-17-2006 08:14 AM ET (US)
Good fix for the 'Anon' contribution bug Sam.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  22
08-10-2006 01:37 AM ET (US)
/m21 You're welcome. It's a nice little poem!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  21
08-09-2006 11:30 AM ET (US)
/m20 Thanks, Karin--and thanks for catching that. It's been corrected.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  20
08-09-2006 10:54 AM ET (US)
Francine, I like your latest line on ZP 171. Did you leave out the word "do" though?
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  19
08-05-2006 04:11 PM ET (US)
Sam, have a great vacation. Will Helen Owly be joining you and your corporeal?
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  18
08-05-2006 10:57 AM ET (US)
/m16 Glad I could help--thanks for all your support!

/m17 Thanks, arch. I'll return the favor when I get back.

BTW, I'd like remind everyone that my corporeal's vacations traditionally have yielded a good pome, e.g. http://www.spoonbill.org/year.php?name=year&value=2003. So rest up for some good hard work. ;-)
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  17
08-03-2006 02:25 PM ET (US)
/m15 Sounds dandy, Sam! I've linked to you. Enjoy your vacation and tell your corporeal to do likewise.
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  16
08-02-2006 10:14 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-02-2006 10:21 PM
Sam, thank you for all the work you've put into ZP over the last couple years and the enjoyment you've given us :-)
And may you and your corporeal have fun on your vacation! Right now I'm sitting under a ceiling fan and also have a tower fan blowing full-blast in my direction. Got up to ninety-seven today. Everyone keep cool!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  15
08-02-2006 01:56 PM ET (US)
/m12 First steps?--heck, with what you folks have done with it over the past two years, I think it's already well into Kindiegarden. ;-) Thanks for the good wishes, though, K. :-)

/m14 Yup, it's official, Arch, so you can go ahead and post the link (which is a favor I'll try to return soon on the ZP, if you like!).

I should warn everyone, though, that next week my dopey corporeal is going on vacation (not that he's done enough to need one...), so if new users cause any mess, I won't be around to clean it up.
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  14
08-02-2006 08:43 AM ET (US)
Sam, is Ziti then officially public? And do you mind if I post a link to it from unthunk?
archaeopteryxPerson was signed in when posted  13
08-01-2006 07:29 PM ET (US)
/m11 Sam, I have noticed (full) Google indexing often takes a while (um, months). I have also found MSN and Yahoo to spider much more regularly. Google usually sends the update spider out within a few weeks of requesting indexing, but full indexing takes a while, and even with correct meta tag usage, good link trails from the root, contenet rich code, a site map register with google, I still have pages that aren't indexed, and dead/404 links still hanging out in Google's index. I think all the R&D is elsewhere, and we're stuck with a 1999 search algorithm. meh.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  12
08-01-2006 06:41 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-01-2006 06:44 PM
/m11 Sam, when I search for "ziti project" on Yahoo, the 15th result is the dspGuru page link. Congratulations! I'm looking forward to watching your baby take its first steps. :-)

P.S. I just checked out MSN search and it's now the third result there.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  11
08-01-2006 02:24 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 08-01-2006 02:25 PM
/m10 I submitted the ZP to Google first. I waited for a few days, which is a reasonable period for such things, but it didn't show up in Google searches. :-(

A day or two ago, I submitted it again to Google, and also to Yahoo and MSN. Searches for "ziti project" in Yahoo began to produce hits in a matter of minutes! MSN began to show results in a day or so. Google still doesn't show any. (If this leads any of you who are stockpickers to decide to go short on Google and long on Yahoo, I can see why--looks like David is beating Goliath again.)

Also, my friends at Iowegian have kindly added a link to the ZP from dspGuru's "Fun" page.

All that makes the ZP officially public--tell your friends!
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  10
08-01-2006 02:04 AM ET (US)
Sam, per News17nine--why didn't the Google folks get it? What does that mean?
Will_HPerson was signed in when posted  9
07-31-2006 02:36 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 07-31-2006 11:31 PM
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  8
07-29-2006 12:12 AM ET (US)
/m7 I just call it 'free verse.'
   And yes, I'd like to see more of that--occasionally.
We need to make more use of that 'scheme' thing--the possibilities are endless. It's another outlet for creativity. And yet often when I start a new pome, I sit there thinking--hmm, scheme? Uhh, I dunno. I'll just leave it open. I'm pretty lazy that way. Or maybe it's the SB conditioning--where one doesn't have a choice.
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  7
07-28-2006 06:33 PM ET (US)
/m Let's try to do more of those--maybe the "Scheme" box could be used to encourage 'em.

BTW, little as I know about the technical aspects of pomery, I was tempted to characterize the scheme on 169 as "unrhymed iambic quadrameter". However, judging by what I found on the Internet, the term "quadrameter" doesn't seem to have credence. So, anybody got a better name for that scheme?
BeefyPerson was signed in when posted  6
07-28-2006 12:49 PM ET (US)
/m169 'Tis a pity - we had a nice "off-rhyme" going for five lines, or maybe it was just me :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  5
07-27-2006 04:45 PM ET (US)
I agreed and have voted accordingly :-)
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  4
07-27-2006 08:53 AM ET (US)
169 seemed to be in the "short but sweet" category, so, in the true Grayman spirit, I voted to end it.
Karin1Person was signed in when posted  3
06-19-2006 12:10 AM ET (US)
Hi y'all! :-)
FrancineFPerson was signed in when posted  2
06-12-2006 11:34 PM ET (US)
Hello!
Kansas SamPerson was signed in when posted  1
06-10-2006 06:32 PM ET (US)
Welcome to The Ziti Project!
RSS link What's this?
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.