QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: NUTTER #264 - Michael Shrimpton, Barrister-at-Law
Views: 10362, Unique: 1276 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
   << 895-901  894-894 of 901  878-893 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
David J WebbPerson was signed in when posted  894
01-22-2009 02:08 PM ET (US)
I essentially agree that Parliament's right to sit derives from the Common Law, and the Common Law is the primary law of theland, and not statute law, which must be shown to be in accordance with our ancient rights before it enters into law.

I found this link interesting: http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?...17733&filesize=2122

It contains the text of the 1423 Confirmation of Liberties Act of Henry VI - an explicit admission that our rights under the Common Law are not repealable. The mediaeval French is clear:

Et primes que Seinte Esglise & toutz les seigneurs espirituelx & temporelx & toutz les autres lieges du Roy aiantz libertees & fraunchises & auxi toutz les Citees & Burghs aient & enjoient toutz lour libertees & fraunchises bien usez & nient repellez ne par la commune ley repellablez
RSS link What's this?
   << 895-901  894-894 of 901  878-893 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.