Guess what they's got in common.

Edited by author 01-08-2009 02:13 AM
Another question to Blimpton and his reply

The Question

Stieber, who claimed to be half-English, seems to have been a slightly seedy old-fashioned sort of detective, and a bullshitter to boot. His unreliable memoirs were published in English as 'The Chancellor's Spy' Stieber's (alleged) crowning achievement was to have sneaked into Karl Marx's home in London and stolen the list of members of the Communist International. Were he alive today he would probably have been the man who launched the BNP membership list onto the internet. In later years most of the prostitutes in Berlin acted as his paid informers. But even Stieber would never have dared venture the claims now being made on his behalf by his worthy successor - the 21st century's leading secret agent - Michael von Schrimpton. Don't forget that spies don't tell the truth. So when Michael claims he is working against the evil Germans it actually means he is working for them.

Blimpton's Reply

The Germans aren't actually that evil, only their leaders and intelligence agencies. Many Germans are actually quite nice. Of course you know full well that I work for the home team, not the sausage-eaters across the water. You surely cannot be so naive as to swallow the autobiography of Bismarck's wily intelligence chief, cleared for publication by the Wilhelmstrasse, as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the turth? I am intrigued by your position - you accept that Stieber ran most of the prossies in Berlin and that he operated in London. Are you saying there were no prossies in London, or that he studiously avoided them? At what point in his glittering intelligence career (sadly for us) do you say he discovered that he could use prossies for blackmail? Which window do you day he used to sneak into Marx's house? Why would the head of Prussian Intelligence and Bismarck's spymaster need to break into the house of one of Prussia's most able and intelligent agents, living in a safe-house paid for by Stieber and to which he had the key?

Do we really want to hear about this moron?

He should be sectioned.

I have never, ever, in my life read the type of claptrap I have had the misfortune in the past to receive from Michael Shrimpton and I have no wish to enter into any discussion forum where his nonsense is circulated.

It surprises me that anyone takes him seriously but then there is always a greater fool somewhere.

He is not a fool at all. He is a barrister who does his best to defend our ancient constitution in the law courts. His views on a range of things may not exactly coincide with ours, but we would surely be sorry to lose his expertise in the courts.

>>He is a barrister who does his best to defend our ancient constitution in the law courts.<<

You mean he wasted £££££££ with a series of ludicrous arguments which were rapidly thrown out of court after a stinging rebuke from the Judge.

Apparently the man drives a nearly-new Bentley. Who do you think paid for that?

Is he the fellow who instigated a load of legal action actions against the Maastricht Treaty, and in doing so wasted a lot of well-meaning patriots' money?

Well, the money was wasted only because our judiciary refuse to uphold the common law. The moral of the case is that the whole judicial bench needs to be replaced. There is little that we can do in such circumstances. The doctrine of the separation of powers has been utterly debauched.

I essentially agree that Parliament's right to sit derives from the Common Law, and the Common Law is the primary law of theland, and not statute law, which must be shown to be in accordance with our ancient rights before it enters into law.

I found this link interesting: http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?...17733&filesize=2122

It contains the text of the 1423 Confirmation of Liberties Act of Henry VI - an explicit admission that our rights under the Common Law are not repealable. The mediaeval French is clear:

Et primes que Seinte Esglise & toutz les seigneurs espirituelx & temporelx & toutz les autres lieges du Roy aiantz libertees & fraunchises & auxi toutz les Citees & Burghs aient & enjoient toutz lour libertees & fraunchises bien usez & nient repellez ne par la commune ley repellablez

Our right to do as we like derives from the fact that we’ve got the power and you ain’t. We wipe our arse on common law and all that ancient mumbo-jumbo bollocks. Do you really think wanking over magna carta will get you anywhere? Duh, we don't give a shit. You just don’t get it do you? We treat you like shit every single fucking day and what do you do about it? Fuck all. Whinge. Message on the internet in between looking at porn. The British, the English, whatever the fuck you call yourselves nowadays, you are all just a bunch of fucking losers. You’ve only got one right, and that’s the right to do as you’re fucking told. Now go vote on Celebrity Big Brother, that’s the only vote you have that counts in this country.

I pity the gullible who listen to and believe Shimpton's claptrap at Marlborough. He is a purveyor of misinformation and disinformation - par for the course from an ex Labour candidate, now affilitated to the treacherous Tory party.

Apparently he's having one of his celebrated Marlborough meetings tomorrow. These take the form of a discussion about the international conspiracy to destroy Britain etc.

It's the usual conspiracy-theory bullshit, except that instead of the culprits being the Jews and Freemasons they are now the Germans in general and the Prussians in particular.

The Israelis and Americans (Republicans only - Obama is a Prussian pawn) are the heroes of this fantasy. Ex-Labour Shrimpton claims to be an anti-Cameron Tory, although he has expressed some sympathy for the sort of people who support the BNP.

According to Shrimpton the Prussians were behind the Irish Potato Famine, the Indian Mutiny, 9/11 and just about every other world disaster since time began.

Whenever Shrimpton takes centre stage I hear the white coats flapping.

A par for the course coarse Moffat posting!

 When the Vatican plans a take-over it does so by using long term devious and secret means. Do they not say "give me a Jesuit boy under the age of ten and he will be ours for life"? One would presume it would also apply to girls. Who was the 'whisperer' at the ear of the young Elizabeth II, Sir Henry Martyn, Cardinal Hume? Elizabeth II and the Roman Catholic Church.

1951 Princess Elizabeth visited the Pope.

 

1951 The Reich re-emerged as the Europäische Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl
European Coal and Steel Community.

1953 June 2nd The Queen's Coronation Oath : ""I Elizabeth do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant."

The Archbishop of Canterbury asked Elizabeth II "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God the true Profession of the Gospel and the Protestant Reform Religion established by law?" The Queen answered: "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God."

 

1961 May 5th Queen Elizabeth visited the Pope. The Queen wore black and the veil in recognition of her heresy in the eyes of the Roman Church, thus acknowledging her acceptance of the primacy of the Roman Church. To accept such primacy, which implies jurisdiction, in Rome is to imply that that primacy also applies here in England. Such recognition breaks Article 37 of the 39 Articles of Religion of The Anglican Reformed Church of England which states that "The Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this realm of England". The Pope is the Bishop of Rome.

1961 August 9th Her Majesty's Prime Minister Harold Macmillian applied for negotiations for EEC entry.

The European economic Community.

The Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinshafts. (Originally drawn up in 1942)

1972 January 22nd The Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Heath, Hurd and Rippon to sign up to the Treaty of Rome. The Queen undoubtedly fully understood that, as there was no provision under the terms of the Treaty for a Constitutional Monarchy within the EU, she would be surrendering the sovereign supremacy of her office to the sovereign supremacy of the European Community. That by so doing, she would be breaking her Coronation Oath to her people which is her contract with them for their governance. That she would be stripping herself of her Sovereignty in Parliament thus destroying the authority of Parliament itself as the national legislating body in Great Britain. That she would also be breaking article 37 of the 39 of the Articles of Religion of the Anglican Reformed Church of England, and dismissing herself as Governor of that Church. She would thus expose the Anglican Reformed Church to the covert insurgencies of dedicated British papists. The Queen must have been aware that the European Community was predominately of the Roman Catholic religion, that it was founded by Jesuits, and had adopted as its emblem the Halo of the Madonna, an idolatrous Roman Catholic symbol to those of the Protestant Church of England, thus breaking the Second of the Ten Commandments.

1972 October 17th The Queen gave her Royal Assent to the European Communities Act 1972.

1980 October 17th The Queen visited the Pope, she wore black and the veil, and kissed the Papal ring, a gesture of her subordination to the office of the Pope and his jurisdiction over her; and by so doing the Queen forfeited the allegiance of the British people. She could not have done this had she still been our Sovereign Monarch and Governor of the Protestant Reformed Church of England.

1982 The Queen invited the Pope to visit the United Kingdom, she also invited the Pope to celebrate mass in Canterbury Cathedral, the Mother Church of the Church of England, which the Duke of Norfolk, the leading RC peer, and the Earl of March were commanded to organise. Gold and platinum plaques were struck by the Royal Mint to celebrate the occasion, bearing the heads of the Queen and the Pope, thus ensuring that even if the Queen did not attend the mass in person, she would be present in image. Ultimately the event was abandoned when certain clerics of the Church of England protested that the it would break church law.

1980s/90s. Coin of the Realm. There are Gibraltan 20 pence coins in circulation which on one side depict the Queen's head, on the other an image of the Madonna and Child, both crowned and seated on a throne, bearing the inscription: "Our Lady of Europe". These coins must have been minted at the Royal Mint. The Queen must have given her approval both of their design and for their production, despite the image being in violation of the second Commandment, and idolatrous in the eyes of Protestants and the Anglican Reformed Church, of which the Queen is Governor.

1992 February 7th The Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude to sign up to the Maastricht Treaty thus making her a citizen of the EU. No one can be both citizen and Sovereign at the same time. Her EU citizenship was confirmed by the then Prime Minister John Major. Had the Queen still been Sovereign Monarch, Major would have been committing perjury and treason. He has never been impeached for his statement. At about this time the Queen sent the Stone of Scone back to Scotland, on the advice of John Major, an action suggesting the Queen's recognition that there would be no further Coronations of our kings or queens in our country. She has broken the Succession to the Throne of the United Kingdom.

(Coronation Service June 2nd. 1953: )

"I Elizabeth do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant."

November the 30th. 1995 marked the day Her Majesty the Queen attended a Service of Commemoration at Westminster Cathedral to mark the Centenary of the building of this spiritual centre of Roman Catholicism in Britain. In doing so Her Majesty belied the declaration above as well as her Coronation Oath. Her attendance was intended to underline ecumenical reconciliation and unity. In fact it symbolizes the continuing retreat of the Protestant identity of our nation and anticipates the removal of the Act of Settlement and the resulting constitutional redundancy of the Monarchy. Here is another event in the ecumenical process that, step by step, is pulling up the historic roots of the Protestant throne.

1999. 12th May. The Pope was recognised as the overall authority in the Christian world by an Anglican and Roman Catholic commission, made up of Anglican and Roman Catholic Bishops, including the Bishop of Canterbury. The Anglican Bishops involved acted in breach of their oaths of allegiance to the Crown, and Article 37 of the 39 Articles of Religion.

As Governor of the Anglican Reformed Church the Queen must have given her approval to the participation by the Anglican Bishops in this commission.

1999. May. The Queen made Cardinal Hume a member of the Order of Merit, an honour she has never bestowed on any Archbishop of Canterbury.

2000 October 17th The Queen visited the Pope in Rome. Again she wore black and the veil, and kissed the Papal Ring in an act of subjugation. In 2004 the Queen commanded her plenipotentiaries Blair and Straw to sign up on her behalf to the EU constitutional treaty.

Note:

The Protestant part of the Coronation Oath, detested by the Roman Catholic hierarchy, has also been changed over time. Prior to 1910, it read: ‘To maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law’. George III was subjected to a strong attack on the ‘Protestant Oath’. He rebutted it with these famous words: "Where is the power on earth to absolve me from the observance of every sentence of that Oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion? Was not my family seated on the Throne for that express purpose, and shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned? No, No, I had rather beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe, than consent to any such measure. I can give up my crown and retire from power. I can quit my palace and live in a cottage. I can lay my head on a block and lose my life, but I cannot break my Oath. If I violate that Oath, I am no longer legal Sovereign in this country".

King Edward VII died on Friday, 6th May 1910. The following Monday, the Times published part of a letter from Irish Nationalist MP W.H.E. Redmond, to the Prime Minister, demanding that he take such steps as may be necessary to relieve the new King from the obligation.

Bob Lomas. The Magna Carta Society.

That quotation from George III was wonderful. He understood our constitution perfectly.

Joining the EU has nothing to do with the RC Church, I am afraid.

But I do agree as Supreme Governor in Earth of the Church of England, Brenda should not meet with Popes or invite them to England. This is what Enoch Powell said too.

No one I am sure would rely on you Mr. Smith for an accurate refection of my views. I struggle to recall a single occasion when you have come even close to putting my viewpoint fairly. Again the abusive nature of your response suggests you are threatened in some way by what I know - this is not an untypical response from supporters of UK EU membership such as yourself. I seem to recall John Major using an identical term of abuse for the Eurosceptics in our Party, who were absolutely right whilst he was utterly wrong.

Those whose point of view is least rational tend to have the greatest difficulty engaging in rational debate, in my experience. Their idea tend to be fixed, as well as irrational - perhapsa there is a subconcious fear the the light of reason will destory the basis for their fixed ideas.