Improving the Participation Rate of People with Targeted Disabilities in the Federal Work Force
http://www.eeoc.gov/federal/report/pwtd.html
.

Suing Your Federal Government for Civil Rights Violations
http://www.constitution.org/grossack/bivens.htm
.

What is a "cause of action" under Bivens? - Davis v. Passman, 99 S. Ct. 2264, 442 U.S. 228 (U.S. 1979)
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/immunity/passman.htm
.

Circuits split over Bivens liability against private prison guards - Bender v. General Services Administration, 539 F.Supp.2d 702 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/prisons/bender.htm
.

Don't even bother suing under "Bivens". I think the only case that prevailed under Bivens, was in 1971. Trust me, I have a case pending in Court against government employees who (in what I believe were working outside the scope of their employment to harass, discriminate, etc.)The Court is the one who actually bought forth that the claim I was trying to bring was under Bivens... and then, they kind of throw it out. Bizarre, unfair, and not surprised!

People's filed EEO again management, 4 EEO waiting for hearing, cover most of the matters. now management retaliations over and over. they never stop. as people can only file EEO once for the same matter. how what to do, while waiting for hearing???

Suing Federal Employees, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) - In Bivens the United States Supreme Court allowed individuals to sue federal employees who wrongfully deprived them of their constitutional rights. Brief - Medical Malpractice Claims Against Public Health Service and Federally Funded Community Health Center Physicians - 2002 Brief - Governmental Immunity for Public Health Service Physicians - Cuoco v. Moritsugu, No. 98-2954 (2d Cir. 07-28-2000)
Brief - When is a contractor physician a U.S. Public Health Service employee? - Dedrick v. Youngblood, 200 F.3d 744 (11th Cir. 2000)
Supreme Court standards for governmental immunity - Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982)
.

http://faxzero.com/ Free Fax•Free!•Ad on the cover page•Fax 1 document - maximum 3 pages •Maximum 2 free faxes per day
.

Veterans Chalk Up Wins at MSPB and Court - Part Two
This is part two of Steve Oppermann's article on "Veterans Chalk up Wins at MSPB and Court" and a string of wins for veterans applying for federal jobs in recent cases.

Posted: October 22, 2009 6:49 AM | Full Story

Federal Circuit Sides With Disabled Vets on Excepted Service Positions
Veterans Chalk Up Wins at MSPB and Court - Part One
Veterans Preference, Federal Hiring and Outstanding Scholars
.

For the 50 most popular USA Newspapers, World Newspapers or
Magazines accessed from OnlinenewsPapers
http://www.onlinene wspapers. com/
.

Very nice site!

Looking for new meat...

VA Settles Sexual Harassment Lawsuit For $25,000
Krista Stephenson claimed she was sexually harassed by Veterans Affairs ("VA") center director Craig Howard while she worked for him as staff assistant. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed a lawsuit on her behalf and the Department of Veterans Affairs agreed to settle the sexual harassment lawsuit for $25,000.

In cases like this many times the parties will reach a voluntary settlement rather than risk a lengthy discovery process and the prospect of trial. At trial the amount awarded could be high or there could be no award at all. By reaching a settlement both parties can contain costs and Stephenson is guaranteed money--while also feeling vindicated by making the VA pay.

Dan Ryan, spokesman for the Canandaigua VA, declined to comment other than to issue a statement saying: “VA personnel matters are confidential by regulation.”

VA Settles Sexual Harassment Lawsuit For $25000 :: Illinois Sexual ...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed a lawsuit on her behalf and the Department of Veterans Affairs agreed to settle the sexual harassment lawsuit for $25000. In cases like this many times the parties will reach a ...
Illinois Sexual Harassment Attorney Blog - http://www.illinoissexualharassmentattorneyblog.com/

We should not sign anything until you have attorney on your side. They should give you any docuements that you are planning to sign, should at least give you enough time to sleep on it. If its a suprise wavier to sign do not sign they will use it against you. If it to happen get attorney and class action lawsuit put it in the post or where the public that been victimized with the same thing. The postal services need to be stopp in there track of turning the table pretending they was the victims. I will be the second person to put my name on the class action discrimination of age and disabilities. If you have a case so do I you can e-mail me at jnbarbara561@netscape.net When under destess do not sign anything if you did still fight them its a law against taking advantage of mental disable

NAPS will not help you? Was the person selected under 40? Is the boss under 40? Everyone male? 9 months of service and not considered for RIF?
I can smell it from here. Please answer the above questions and begin reading the MSPB filing procedures.

Yes, to clarify, I am a former BDT member absorbed by HQ Sales. We then went into a RIF. I have not been selected twice now by our new (less than 9 months of service) sales manager. No, I am not a vet. Just a plain 50 year old, 27 years of service caucasion male. I am considered an impacted employee. I'm in Alaska, our group was given 3 positions, of which only one position has been awarded. And to boot, he gave it to the least qualified person in the existing group. I'm looking for guidance from NAPS and anyone else who can shed a bit of light on how does someone stand up against this nonsense.