|
Marijanus
10-23-2007
04:28 AM PST (US)
|
Hello!
Hello all! Very nice site and very informativity!
give thanks
Klein
berirtrerejas
|
|
|
Deleted by author 05-16-2006 09:15 AM
|
|
Perspective
04-14-2006
09:10 AM PST (US)
|
Shannon,
Since I’ve been banned from the triallog site, maybe you’d be so kind and forward this on to David Jahn, and the boys. I hate to say it: But I told these guys this argument is Constitutionally wrong. They just don’t seem to listen.
Thank you. Perspective
DOJ going after lost horizons
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2006 WWW.USDOJ.GOV
UNITED STATES SUES NINE IN NATIONWIDE CRACKDOWN ON TAX-REFUND SCAM
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Justice Department announced today that, in a nationwide crackdown against a tax-fraud scheme promoted by Peter Eric Hendrickson of Commerce Township, Mich., it has brought suit against nine people this week. According to the government complaints, filed in seven lawsuits across the country, the nine peopleincluding Hendrickson and his wife Doreen M. Hendricksonhave received a total of nearly $150,000 in erroneous tax refunds by submitting false forms with their federal tax returns to replace W-2 and 1099 forms that correctly reported their income.
In seven suits filed in U.S. district courts in California, Nevada, Michigan, Alabama, Florida and Kansas, the Justice Department seeks to recover the erroneous refunds. In addition, the suit against Hendrickson, filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, asks the court to enjoin him from filing false tax forms and returns. A violation of the injunction would be punishable as contempt of court.
According to the complaint, Hendrickson claims that only government workers are subject to income taxes. Hendrickson tells people to not submit their W-2 and 1099 forms with their tax returns, and in their place submit substitute or corrected W-2 and 1099 forms that they create on which they change their reported income to zero. Under the scheme, people then submit the falsified forms with a tax return falsely reporting no income and request a refund of all taxes withheld from wages. This scheme is number one on the IRS s 2006 list of the Dirty Dozen tax scams, posted at
SpamEater.Net found possible fraud attempt from "www.losthorizons.com" claiming to be
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=154293,00.html.
Federal law provides serious penalties for filing false tax forms, said Eileen J. O Connor, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department s Tax Division. People who engage in tax fraud schemes can expect to pay back taxes, plus interest and penalties, and may face criminal prosecution for evading taxes.
The suit against Hendrickson alleges that he was convicted in 1992 on federal criminal charges for failing to file a federal income tax return and for a conspiracy involving a firebomb placed in a bin at a U.S. Post Office in Royal Oak, Mich. on April 16, 1990, the last day on which tax returns could be postmarked that year. Hendrickson testified at a co-conspirator s trial that he wrapped a tea bag around the bomb s tubing as a reference to the Boston Tea Party tax protest.
The seven people sued in addition to the Hendricksons are Sharon K. Artman of Largo, Fla.; Michael J. Dowling of San Diego; Joy M. Ferguson of Henderson, Nev.; Melvin L. Gerstenkorn of Topeka, Kan.; Larry B. Golson and Debra G. Golson of Montgomery, Ala.; and James A. Spitzer of Winter Park, Fla. Copies of all seven complaints will be posted with this press release today at
SpamEater.Net found possible fraud attempt from "www.losthorizons.com" claiming to be
http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/taxpress2006.htm.
This week s suits are part of the IRS s and Justice Department s efforts against tax-fraud schemes. More information about these efforts can be found at
SpamEater.Net found possible fraud attempt from "www.losthorizons.com" claiming to be
www.usdoj.gov/tax/taxpress2006.htm. Information about the Tax Division can be found at
SpamEater.Net found possible fraud attempt from "www.losthorizons.com" claiming to be
www.usdoj.gov/tax.
|
|
Shannon Buckner
04-12-2006
07:43 PM PST (US)
|
Actually, to be totally honest, that thought had never occurred to me. If the "tax patriots" believe the courts are corrupt, why oh why would Dale and Anonymous 2 cite them ad nasauem? I swear I can picture Anonymous 2 (although I am partial to my hubbies nick for the idiot - "Coward2")walking around muttering "Yick Wo" much the same as Dustin Hoffman and his "Wopner's on" line in the movie "Rain Man".
|
|
Perspective
04-11-2006
10:01 AM PST (US)
|
Shannon,
You are absolutely correct regarding Dale Eastman citing cases out of context. I have suggested to Dale and others on the Trial-log that their positions are actually Constitutionally off point, and have NO chance of winning in any U.S. Court. My statements have fallen on deft ears.
The so-called patriots movement are under the delusion that the courts are supposed to argue their off point issues for them; at the same time the patriots believe ALL courts are corrupt — through — and through. These dichotomies are false from both ends of the legal spectrum. The courts are not there to put up a defense for the defendant, anymore than prosecute for the prosecution. And if the patriots really belief that the courts are corrupt they have failed to prove it, via appeals, for the past 35 plus years.
So getting back to Patriot’s untenable position: Why should any self-respecting, true believing, patriot believe anything that the courts have to say, even those cases Dale cites for his authority? The whole premise of David Jahn’s site is prejudicial: Which is, everything is wrong with the justice system and nothing is right with the government. If that statement was truly the case the American people have Constitutional means to correct it. But first you have to identify the real legal issues before sticking your foot into your mouth. Which I have suggested the patriots have been doing for over 35 years.
Their solution was to shut me up, along with a few others: They (Dale) had David Jahn BAN me from his site – I guess any opposition to their views or truth hurts their sensitive ears. Since the banning David’s site appears to have slowed down to a trickle of the same old rhetoric and same old gibberish.
Perspective
|
|
Shannon Buckner
04-06-2006
02:21 PM PST (US)
|
JS
The essential claim of sophistry is that the actual logical validity of an argument is irrelevant (if not non-existent); it is only the ruling of the audience which ultimately determines whether a conclusion is considered "true" or not.
While Dale likes to pretend that he is "citing" court cases, he's actually taking the cases out of context and using demented definitions of words to appeal to the prejudices and emotions of wannabe tax protestors. He can garner favorable treatment for his side of the argument and cause a factually false position to be ruled true. That you could actually consider the possibility that the income tax is a vast government conspiracy, kept alive by thousands of people without one ever "cracking" - is proof that those of the tax protesting mind set believe only what they want to believe. They arrange the facts to suit their pre-formed belief. Eastman is a prime example of this.
|
|
JS
04-02-2006
07:32 AM PST (US)
|
I don't understand what you mean by softistry.
Can you elaborate?
I read his site and it is mostly supreme court cases and what the court says. It that what you mean by softistry?
|
|
Dale Eastman
03-31-2006
09:13 PM PST (US)
|
Sweet dreams.
http://www.synapticsparks.info/tax/income1909.html
|
|
Shannon Buckner
03-24-2006
08:20 AM PST (US)
|
I'm back. Things kept me away for a few. I ignore it and this is what happens? JS, I wouldn't read anything written by Dale Eastman, unless I needed to fall asleep real fast. He's the undisputed king of sophistry.
|
|
JS
03-14-2006
09:03 AM PST (US)
|
You might be interested in this site. It is full of interesting insights about our corrupt courts and government agents (especiallly the IRS)
http://www.synapticsparks.info/us/031306.html
feel free to join us there for some lively debate.
JS
PS You can also post here, http://www.triallogs.blogspot.com/, and it will show up here http://www.synapticsparks.info/us/031306.html if it isn't just more government diatribe
|
|
JS
03-13-2006
08:21 AM PST (US)
|
Hi Shannon, Do study tax law too?
|
|
Ricky Rudd Rules
03-13-2006
12:05 AM PST (US)
|
http://www.synapticsparks.info/tax/index.html
|
|
Shannon Buckner
03-05-2006
07:46 PM PST (US)
|
Hi! We've decided to let me try to run the Forum. OK, I decided to let me try to fun the forum. He's busy with other things and he really ignores the blog more than he should. So, if any of you highly intelligent tax protestors wish to spar with me, the water's fine.
|
Frank Buckner  03-05-2006
07:34 PM PST (US)
|
Welcome to the Forum. I don't really know if this will work or not. But, I figured it's worth a shot. If there's no interest after a couple of weeks, I'll simply delete it.
|
New Topic
My Topics
Views:
568
(Unique:
206
) / Subscribers:
1 | What's this?
