QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: statistics of natural image categories
Views: 1351, Unique: 533 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 3-5  1-2 of 5        
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Dave BradleyPerson was signed in when posted  1
01-22-2006 09:37 PM ET (US)
Please post here on Torralba's "Statistics of Natural Image Categories"
Pete Barnum  2
01-28-2006 07:53 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 01-28-2006 07:58 PM
Torralba and Oliva's results look pretty good for the images that they used, but based on the few samples that they showed, they already represent a sampling of scenes that people find interesting. Even the "panoramic" views seem a bit restricted. For instance, they show a picture of a pedestrian, but it seems equally likely that a random picture from that environment would have half a pedestrian or just a brick wall. I'd be interested to see if they would be able to get interesting results from a 360 degree spherical panorama. I imagine that a large view would have distinctive characteristics, whether they would be from changing depth estimations or different content.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 3-5  1-2 of 5        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.