QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Ullman
Views: 1179, Unique: 462 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 3-8  2-2 of 8  1-1 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Pete Barnum  2
01-31-2006 03:33 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 01-31-2006 03:39 PM
Vidal and Ulman use just low-res pictures of cars for their '03 paper, and I wonder if they're getting such good results just because they've created a spanning set of the side view of cars. They started with a set of 59 thousand fragments, and I wonder if the results were that much better than an exhaustive search would be. On the other hand, maybe using a heuristic on a huge amount of data is what people do too, and it might be a very robust classifier. But still, I'd like to see them try to correctly classify several different types of objects, rather than deciding if a query is inside or outside one class.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 3-8  2-2 of 8  1-1 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.