QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: 9/11 conspiracy theories
Views: 3054, Unique: 825 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 8-19  7-7 of 19  1-6 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
peter honeyman  7
01-07-2006 11:46 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 01-07-2006 11:47 AM
silverstein was not reading from a script and did not have the opportunity to edit his remarks for clarity or precision. there are many ways he could have said what he meant, many interpretations of what he said.

"pull it" means nothing in isolation. it is subject to interpretation.

you are right, he might have meant "destroy the building."

i am right, he might have meant "remove the firefighters."

anyone who has some other interpretation, from "will work for food" to "happy mother's day" is right, he might have meant that, too.

however, i reject your claim that (1) he said "pull it" when he meant "destroy it" and (2) in an interview that he knew would be broadcast nationally, he admitted that he is a central figure in a secret conspiracy that destroyed thousands of lives and billions of dollars in property.

ridiculous? some nerve? so be it.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 8-19  7-7 of 19  1-6 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.