QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: 9/11 conspiracy theories
Views: 2547, Unique: 641 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 4-19  1-3 of 19        
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Adam de Angeli  3
12-31-2005 07:26 PM ET (US)
Larry:

My rebuttal is posted at

http://www.a2planet.com/blog/kast-911.html

Also, I forgot to include a short great called "911 - All the Proof You Need," at

http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_all_the_proof_you_need.html
Adam de Angeli  2
12-31-2005 03:04 PM ET (US)
Larry, your article certainly warrants a thorough response, and it will have one. I'll need a little bit of time to write it.

In the meantime, let me just point out that, for obvious reasons, there are plenty of loony conspiracies about the attacks (some people saying there were no planes involved, etc.)

But if you cast aside of all them, you are still left with no easy explanation as to how the terrorists could have taken control of the planes and guided them to their targets, a process which took a good while, without any response from the various Air Force, Army, and FAA rapid-response teams.

No explanation, either, for why the FBI and CIA were ordered off of Bin Laden's trail as they discovered evidence of the impending plot.

No explanation for why the Secret Service didn't evacuate Bush from Booker Elementary school, when they could not have safely assumed Bush would not have been a target (his appearance was announced in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune three days prior).

No explanation for why Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex, gave the order to "pull" Building 7, or how the demolition could have been prepared in less than one day's time.

No explanation for why the insider trading on the airlines and WTC businesses affected was not investigated.

Instead, you've cited the most dubious suggestions people have put forth.

Until my response is complete, I suggest people that want to investigate matters for themselves have a peek through

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wrh_9-11_index.html
Paul  1
12-31-2005 09:52 AM ET (US)
Larry, that was really interesting. Along with the other points you raise, one more that occurs to me is that the conspirators would have been in an embarrassing spot if one of their hypothetical drone-planes had malfunctioned or otherwise somehow failed to accomplish its mission to hit a tower, leaving all the tell-tale explosives and other tell-tale equipment in place to be examined.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 4-19  1-3 of 19        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.