QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Angular Radial Partitioning / Line Face Map
Views: 1231, Unique: 507 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 5-9  4-4 of 9  1-3 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Erik Murphy-Chutorian  4
10-27-2005 04:45 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2005 04:51 PM
The Edge image description paper claims that the system is "Scale-Invariant". On page two, it says that scale invariance is achieved by "normalizing the edge map to WxW pixels". In other words, if I present the same image at two resolutions, the system can normalize them to the same size. This is hardly scale-invariance. In fact, this only could work if you surmise that the object has been perfectly segmented (or at least provided with a cropping rectangle), but the authors claim that their system avoids "segmentation preprocessing" , but unless I am not understanding it correctly, it appears that every object IS provided with a segmentation by bounding box. There is no reference to a multi-scale global search e.g. Viola and Jones either.
Reading this, it appears that the authors are not up to date with the literature, and that many relevant references are missing.

This is in great contrast to the PAMI paper which is well-written and insightful.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 5-9  4-4 of 9  1-3 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.