Discussions

Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 65-80  49-64 of 105  33-48 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  64
09-29-2006 09:51 AM ET (US)

I didn't do it!


Sympathy for Our Wendy. She's the author of a piece she didn't write - and wouldn't, either!
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  63
09-01-2006 09:49 AM ET (US)

Is that a robot in your pocket, or...?


Here's a little poem which illustrates why it is an elephant:
  
    So oft in theologic wars,
    The disputants, I ween,
    Rail on in utter ignorance
    Of what each other mean,
    And prate about an Elephant
    Not one of them has seen![4]
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  62
07-28-2006 12:55 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 07-28-2006 12:57 PM

Into the lobby together!


It was even more of a surprise when occasional contributor, Kieren McCarthy, also announced he was standing. And no, the Editor is NOT standing...

Tags: , , , ,
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  61
07-28-2006 11:45 AM ET (US)

Into the lobby!


It was rather a surprise when Wendy announced that she was going for one of the seven vacant slots on the ICANN board...
 Person was signed in when posted  60
07-26-2006 04:47 AM ET (US)
Deleted by topic administrator 07-26-2006 11:08 AM
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  59
07-21-2006 09:35 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 07-21-2006 09:36 AM
I think that's right. Take Miles Kington whose humour column has amazed us for years in The Independent. Is that journalism?

By definition, most would say, "yes, because it is part of a daily paper." Ten years ago, we'd have accepted that.

G
Andrew Ducker  58
07-21-2006 09:18 AM ET (US)
I think the differences are ones of action, not of location. I can be a journalist, provide incisive comment and keep a diary all in the one location, but it's the location that gets referred to as a blog (or a journal, or a homepage or a website).

I write. On some days I write about current events. Other days I post links to things I find amusing. Sometimes I let people know what I'm up to. Frequently I do all of these on the same day.

The labels, I think, apply to individual pieces of writing, which in the past would have appeared in different places, organised by type. On the internet they tend to be organised by person, and that's going to take some gettting used to.
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  57
07-21-2006 08:29 AM ET (US)

Journalism vs blogging...


I think there are important distinctions between journalism (which does not have to include blogging) and real blogging (which doesn't have to exclude journalism) and simply diary keeping.

But the distinction is vague. After all, the keeping of a journal, or diary, was what journal-ism was...

Tags: , , , </p>
 
Messages 56-53 deleted by topic administrator 07-21-2006 08:26 AM
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  52
06-30-2006 05:21 AM ET (US)

Fully Updated Beyond All Repair


Remember the "regulatory powers" plan (still going through Parliament in the UK) which would allow the Minister to retrospectively "correct" a bug in a Law without bothering the House of Commons? Well, how would you like a technology which automatically updated the Internet to match?
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  51
06-16-2006 11:50 AM ET (US)

I did this to me?


Of course we want to catch criminals. So we tape their phones.
Then we find that our own phones are tapped...
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted  50
06-05-2006 05:17 AM ET (US)
I think the whole nudity taboo is deeply corrupt. But it's also a given; it is like that. So if there is a problem about being perceived as a "purveyor of nudity" (and there can be) the question is more to do with how effective the response is.

Frankly, I can't see that the Six Apart response is rational. I mean, I really, really doubt that LiveJournal will become a haven for free porn purveyors just because images of mammary glands are permitted. Equally, I think MySpace would be idiotic to yield to pressure to ban entries from known pornsters.

But I bet both of them will persist with their policies.
lady reality  49
06-04-2006 09:35 AM ET (US)
One has to question the faith of individuals decrying "They banned Jesus" when the images of Jesus were intentionally used knowing that they violated current policies and reported to Livejournal in order to test the abuse team.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 65-80  49-64 of 105  33-48 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.