| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
| Zef
|
376
|
 |
|
04-28-2005 03:51 PM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 04-28-2005 09:23 PM
Dang, Bill, i always forget to tell you that you might like this and this shirt.
|
Bill the Splut
|
377
|
 |
|
04-28-2005 10:19 PM ET (US)
|
|
Deleted by author 04-28-2005 10:19 PM
|
Bill the Splut
|
378
|
 |
|
04-28-2005 10:19 PM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 04-28-2005 10:21 PM
(double posting deleted) Davey tries to clear up the confusion over the latest crap: "Now you know why he's so grossed out. Remember, Jim's in a vixen fursuit. (I'll be having more hints to the amount of kinkiness--or lack thereof--in Jim/Scarlet's life, both pre- and post-onding, in the next 2-3 strips.)" Huh? Now I know? The only other thing he says is in the comment before: "I've offically introing him [Toni] at this page." Nice grammar and spelling, but what the hell? So Toni is a gay guy who just happened to wander into Jim's $25-a-week apartment, and then decided to rape the giant squirrel girl? Then HOW COME JIM KNOWS HE'S TONI? I now know less than I did before the explanation. BBC, please quiz him on this. A simple "WTF?" would suffice.
|
SteveM
|
379
|
 |
|
04-28-2005 10:32 PM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 04-28-2005 10:33 PM
BBC, please quiz him on thisCould I also ask if BBC, or an alter ego did the fanart? The person with the moustache looks familiar. Edit: And the quality of art is what I would expect!
|
Bill the Splut
|
380
|
 |
|
04-28-2005 11:05 PM ET (US)
|
|
Hitchhiker's: Ebert gives it 2 stars (no full review until tmw), and the Tomatometer is evenly split. We'll see the consensus tmw, I guess, when the reviews start pouring in.
|
Bill the Splut
|
381
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 12:33 AM ET (US)
|
|
Good luck with the sepratism, Bill. I'd root for you, but it would give Quebec dumb ideas again (like: We'll be a different country, but we'll use your money and passports, and we'll not pay off our chunk of the national debt when we go).
Well, of course we wouldn't pay Red America's debt. Blue States, especially NY/NEngland, pay way more in taxes than we get back--and ours goes to those nanny state welfare moms of the Red States.
Unlike Quebec, we have a bit of an edge. CT's New London sub base. We have an entire fleet of nukular subs. We have the bomb! We have multiple A and H bombs! Defy us NOW, Dark Lord Bush!
|
Bill the Splut
|
382
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 12:40 AM ET (US)
|
|
The person with the moustache looks familiar.
Not to me. And the fan-art lacks the satiric touch Mimi would add...
|
SteveM
|
383
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 01:20 AM ET (US)
|
|
the fan-art lacks the satiric touch Mimi would add
I don't know, drawing Scarlett better than Davey himself can draw her wins the sarcasm award from me.
|
| Mimi
|
384
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 09:16 AM ET (US)
|
|
Sorry folks, but that ain't me. I out-age her by 9 years, for a start ;)
And I have little enough time as it is to create a sockpuppet Devart account, much less use one as actively as she seems to. Least of ALL to draw Davey fanart. I'm sure if BBC was a fanartist of any skill, she'd have said so by now. I'm toying with having a 'friend' of hers with more talent draw a Tink/Firestorm pic, seeing as despite my suggestion, I doubt Davey's ever going to. I think BBC needs to do something positive... she's been joining Raptavio in the snide criticism lately ;)
And whaddya mean the 'tache looks familiar??... you trying to say something? *peers worriedly in mirror*
re. the latest PI - .... Bill, I beseech you to resurrect InExOb PURELY for this page alone. What the CRAP is going on here and who the DOUBLE-CRAP with ALMONDS is saying what??
|
Ernst Bitterman
|
385
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 09:22 AM ET (US)
|
|
Unlike Quebec, we have a bit of an edge. CT's New London sub base. We have an entire fleet of nukular subs. We have the bomb!
I dunno... isn't the whole US military swarming with guys who jynd up so's they cud lerrn ta reed? Ah, wait, I'm thinking of non-nuclear submarine branches. It doesn't do to have a sub half-full of guys who can't learn that it's naughty to try opening the hatches to slip out for a smoke, and squirt chaw-leavin's into the Vertical Launch Array elements.
...and now I feel bad for making fun of your armed forces. Your president picks on them enough without my help.
|
Ernst Bitterman
|
386
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 09:25 AM ET (US)
|
|
What the CRAP is going on here and who the DOUBLE-CRAP with ALMONDS is saying what??
Heee! THAT gets into my conversational rotation! [prolonged applause]
|
| Roger
|
387
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 11:57 AM ET (US)
|
|
Hi all, Just to chip in on a comment from Bill's updates. Sambo's is not Denny's. Sambo's went out of business as a chain in the late 70's, and Dennys was growing about them, so they probably bought up a lot of the old restaurants. I remember going to one in Colorado in the late 70's. I guess I failed to notice the underlying racism in their themeing, then again I was 6. Although the original Sambo's is still alive in Santa Barbara. Its the only one left.
|
Bill the Splut
|
388
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 09:03 PM ET (US)
|
|
Roger, you're right. A quick Google shows that when Sambo's went out of business, most of them were BOUGHT by Denny's' leading people (like me) to assume that they were the same business. Although I'll bet that they bought them because they liked the name...
|
Bill the Splut
|
389
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 09:28 PM ET (US)
|
|
|
| Mimi
|
390
|
 |
|
04-29-2005 10:00 PM ET (US)
|
|
Speaking as someone who HAS read the books, HAS the radio play, HAS just seen the movie, but does NOT consider oneself a rabid Adams fan, I liked HHGttG fine. Honestly, I'm not enough of an Adams fan to either praise it to the heavens or condemn it thoroughly. I thought it was good for giggles. The filmmakers have been saying from the start that it's just another version of the story, as much as the tv series resembled the radio play resembled the books. Honestly, if Adams had lived and supervised this movie down to the last frame, fans still wouldn't be happy. It could simply be that HH is not really a visual work. Like Lewis Carroll, a lot of the appeal and fans' favourite momens are in the dialogues and narration by the Book.. which unfortunately makes boring cinema/telly. Lucas himself lost leagues of die-hard fans with the prequels (I know I'm not in any hurry to see Ep 3.), so what chance does HHGttG really have? It can't win.
Not a towering masterpiece by any means, but good for giggles. I gave it an 8.
|
| Prankster
|
391
|
 |
|
04-30-2005 02:08 AM ET (US)
|
|
It was interesting--a mix of very good bits and stuff that just didn't work. I think Ebert is being willfully obtuse, the way he often does with geeky properties (and like so many critics, he insists on believing that the movie accurately represents the book, which is annoying.) I tend to think it's one of those cases where the script and the director were at odds--the writing seemed to capture Adams well, but the director kept pushing for broadness, and adding his own bits.
I think that in a few years, when it's just one of the many HHGTTG adaptations out there, the movie will be better-liked.
|