QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Sathya Sai Baba 2005: Who Is He?
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 843-858  827-842 of 2980  811-826 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top    (not accepting new messages)
Susan Olorenshaw  827
10-28-2006 08:42 AM ET (US)
Thank you for this opportunity to set the record straight. Recently, I found that someone had posted a message on an Anti-Baba web-site that was quoted out of context from a letter I sent to the editor of India Today in response to a degrading article they printed about Sai Baba in December, 2000 - 75 years of Sathya Sai Baba - Faith and Controversy. My letter, the full text of which was not printed in the magazine or on the web-site, was the only letter published in the next edition of India Today supporting Sai Baba by outlining the differences between eastern and western attitudes to religion and sex. I tried to remove this post from their message board but was unable to do so as I was not given access. I have been a devotee of Sai Baba for 8 years and lived in Puttaparthy and Whitefield for most of that time near his ashrams and travelled extensivelly through India as well as exploring the sacred literature on which his teachings are based and my faith has only been re-affirmed, although I have been tested many times, almost beyond bearing, the many miracles he has created in my life bear witness to a power beyond human comprehension. I am humbled and blessed. I request that whoever has posted the comment that was quoted out of context to this anti-baba web-site please remove it, as it was not posted with my consent and distorts my views completely. Sai Ram.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  828
10-28-2006 12:43 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-28-2006 12:43 PM
Susan, I seriously doubt that Anti-Sai Sites will remove your quote from their sites. However, if you would like to provide a clarification regarding this matter, please feel free to Contact Me and I can help you publicly clarify your post on my website that exposes the lies, deceit and dishonesty of Anti-Sai Activists: SaiSathyaSai.com.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  829
10-28-2006 05:54 PM ET (US)
Deleted by author 10-29-2006 04:00 PM
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  830
10-28-2006 07:05 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-28-2006 07:06 PM
Susan, exbaba.com has a disclaimer they recently put on their site saying they will correct information so if that is where your quote was you can contact them and see if they live up to their written statement. My experience is that they will do nothing. We have asked them to correct much misinformation and they won't lift a finger. Not much you can do when people are so bigoted and narrow-minded that it makes them blind.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  831
10-28-2006 10:47 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-29-2006 03:51 AM
/m810

And according to YOUR logic Sanjay, we have no proof children were not molested by YOU. After all, you admitted downloading illegal porn while falsely claiming you worked for the Internet Watch Foundation. And what about that jesus porn you were looking at? We have no proof you were not molesting jesus either. After all you were asking for pics of "naughty jesus." With your sordid background one can only wonder whether you are into Satanic worship involving child sacrifice.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  832
10-28-2006 11:56 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-29-2006 12:10 AM
Now Moreno would like to recruit Susan Olorenshaw in order to feed his negative campaign of lies, deceit, slander and dishonesty. As if this guy wasn't suspicious enough?

/m812

"To the contrary Sanjay (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED"), I have wholly refuted your lamentable "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" which almost exclusively relied on Sai Devotees and LIMF (by your own admission)."

LOL, talk about psychological brainwashing. None of Gerald Moreno's "refutations" actually dealt with the subject matter. It is a three-blog rant about how I have allegedly used sources to suit my own "agenda". No comment whatsoever about the exposure of the strong culture of Shirdi worship in Puttaparthi, which proves Sai Baba as a liar when he said that nobody knew of Shirdi Sai Baba in the region. Nor about the fact that the young Raju was himself a Shirdi Sai devotee, worshipping Shirdi Sai by attending local bhajans, reading the Sri Sai Satcharita, worshipping his pictures, reciting the 'Shirdi Sai Dandakam', and on top of all that he wore a Shirdi Sai locket around his neck! And there is more to come on this issue. :-)

Nope, poor Moreno has nothing to say about all of this, and is simply enraged about how I allegedly use sources to suit my own "agenda". LOL, pathetic.

"And my article is almost done about Baba's birthdate. It is scathing! Coming soon."

Yawn, wake me up when it's ready. If it's anywhere near as "scathing" as Moreno's refutation of the Alaya Rahm article (which was scathing? more like laughable) then I ain't gonna be holding mah breath, Sir! :-)

/m815

Thank you Sanjay. You are saying that all the allegations made against Sathya Sai Baba being a "pedophile" have no proof to back them up whatsoever. It is all "secret", just like all the other alleged "proof" Anti-Sai Activists claim they have against Sathya Sai Baba.

Look how Moreno contradictsd his own words. In one breath he says that we have no proof, and in the next breath he makes references to "secret" proof. LOL. Yes, I repeat what I said earlier; there is plenty of proof but it is not for you. :-) Apparently, even ordinary observers (like Edward et al) who have next-to-no knowledge of the SSB controversy are not too bothered about it, which is why many - many - people now have a negative attitude towards Sathya Sai Baba. Now it has entered the academic mainstream, so tough luck! :-)

"Strange enough, all those parents whose children have allegedly been sexually abuse by Baba have done absolutely nothing about it in the past 6 years. No police complaints. No court cases. Nothing. And you can always provide your "proof" for others here to see. You can't do it and neither can anyone else. I know why: Because there is no proof against Sathya Sai Baba. Nothing. Zilch. Nada."

I don't know how Moreno can sit there and lie so much. He of all people know that there have been at least two court cases lodged against Sathya Sai Baba; one in India and one in America.

So don't be fooled by the repeated assertions of Sai Organisation puppets like Gerald Moreno and Lisa De Witt, who midnlessly repeat the same old rubbish again and again and again. Court cases have been lodged in India and in the USA.

It should also be noted that Gerald Moreno is a devotee/supporter of the Sathya Sai Baba Copycat: Swami Premananda. Despite the fact that this copycat "guru" has been convicted for murder and rape of 13 girls (not women), as well as the decision being upheld by the Supreme Court of India in spite of so-called "evidence" to exonerate him, he is still languishing in jail. In spite of all these documented facts, Morneo continues to display his devotion to Premananda by dedicating a photo gallery to him on one of his websites, as well as constructing his own page about how/why he thinks Premananda is innocent.

Hands up all those who think Moreno is some weirdo psycho attracted to gurus who put their hands where they don't belong? :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  833
10-28-2006 11:58 PM ET (US)
Susan, I am sure that Exbaba.Com will remove your comments if you wish it so. Please contact them on this matter.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  834
10-29-2006 12:08 AM ET (US)
And for the record, I have plenty of witness statements and testimonials from all sorts of people who think that Gerald and Lisa are paid agents of Sathya Sai Baba and/or the Sai Organisation to defend him on the Internet. Really, when I go public with this information you will be astounded. :-)

By the way, since Gerald Moreno thinks that he is some sort of wise guy asking for "proof" of Sathya Sai Baba's molestations of little boys and young men, we may well ask what sort of proof is required to prove without doubt. (I have said this many times before but since Gerald Moreno and his cohorts insist on playing silly games, I may as well repeat myself. As far as I can see, there are only two ways to prove Sathya Sai baba as a homosexual paedophile:

1 - To catch him red-handed.
2 - Photographic/video evidence showing him molesting one of his victims.

Regarding Possibility 1, several people (including long-time devotee and close associate Dr. N. Bhatia) testify about a young boy who was sodomised by Sai Baba. Incidentally Bhatia testifies also to his long sexually active relationship with Sai Baba.

Possibility 2 - A photograph of Sathya Sal molesting a child exists. When this evidence is submitted into court, that will be the beginning of the end. I hope and pray that the photo will be splashed across the newspapers and the TV, with the offending part pixelated for public sensibilities, of course. :-)

Oh, let's not forget a third possibility: Sathya Sai Baba's DNA extracted from a semen sample that is present in either the mouth or the anus of the child in question. If Gerald Moreno wishes, he may organise a checkup for all students to undergo a spontaneous physical examination by which DNA samples are taken from the mouths/anuses of all students.

After all, they do that in the Olympics too, random drug-testing. So random semen/DNA-testing. Do it. :-)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  835
10-29-2006 01:42 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-03-2008 01:34 AM
/m834

Too funny. Sanjay has "testimonials from all sorts of people." Yeah, we know how "reliable" the anti-Sai testimonials are. And we certainly know about what sorts of people are in the anti-Sai group. From wanted criminals like Anton Hein to sleazy unindicted perverts like you. I suppose now you'll tell me they are "signed affidavits." ROTFL. You are so dumb it's pathetic Sanjay. Please do go public with your non-existent info though. Maybe someone in the Sai org. will sue you for defamation.

If anti-Sais were any dumber they'd all be rocks.

The truth is nobody needs to be paid to be motivated stand up to you crooked con artists.



Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  836
10-29-2006 06:26 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-29-2006 04:29 PM
. Hello,

if you are reading this, then you have received an auto-reply informing
you of your being banned from the Sathya Sai Baba Discussion Club. This
may be because your posts have continually proved their unsuitability
for publication and you have consistently caused a problem with
discussions on this board. Members who have previously been banned without
making reparation are forbidden from trying to rejoin. Please do not try to
rejoin this forum under deceptive or anonymous means until or unless
due reparations are made.

Goodbye,

Admin.



______________________


Words are useless! Gobble-gobble-gobble-gobble-gobble! Too much of it, dahling, too much!That is why I show you...
 

http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/87/haha1ji5.gif

...i'm still a member,BWAHAHAHHA


p.s.
Dadlani you can't do anything about it, HAHAahahah


it seems you're a moderator of a group created by a guy who calls prophet Mohamed a pedophile and you even agreed with him in a certain post!
oops!
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  837
10-29-2006 06:54 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-30-2006 12:25 AM
/m836

And remember how dorky Dadlani the hypocrite supreme whined about me "censoring" people in my group?

What's wrong cowardly, dud boy, afraid the truth might get out about what liars you all are?

BTW, that group was open to the public until about the time Sanjay took over. I know because I have referenced NUMEROUS posts off of that group for years before he came along. Obviously, Sanjay has MUCH to hide.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  838
10-29-2006 07:12 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 10-29-2006 04:00 PM
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  839
10-29-2006 12:59 PM ET (US)
A full response to the Anti-Sai Pervert, Sanjay Kishore Dadlani regarding Sathya Sai Baba's birthday date:


Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

Joe108Person was signed in when posted  840
10-29-2006 01:09 PM ET (US)
It is to be aptly noted that Sanjay is once again speculating about Sathya Sai Baba with no proof. Apparently, all Sanjay can do is cite rumors, conspiracy theories and second-hand and anonymous stories to support his allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. That's it.

Sanjay lost and is a loser. Substantiate your claims with proof or shut up. :-)

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

Joe108Person was signed in when posted  841
10-29-2006 04:18 PM ET (US)
For the record, once again, I am not a "devotee" of Swami Premananda. There is a website that discusses the allegations against Premananda in which all the alleged victims recanted their confessions because they claimed they were tortured by the police into giving false statements. Also, a world-reknown DNA specialist, Dr. Wilson J. Wall, said the following about the DNA "evidence" against Swami Premananda:
"... When I say that the accused has not fathered this foetus, what I mean to say is that there is not even a chance, or even an infinitesimal chance of him being the father....Someone is trying to set-up Swami Premananda. The DNA case is a fabrication from start to finish. This deception throws a terrible shadow over validity of DNA fingerprinting if now there are scientists who are prepared to misuse it to find the innocent guilty." (Reference)

Any fair-minded person who reads these facts will have valid doubts as to the veracity of the allegations made against Swami Premananda.

Of course, when it comes to the sexual abuse of the Hare Krishna's, Sanjay glosses over it and is very forgiving for their shortcomings even though he claimed he was abused (sexually?) in the Hare Krishna's as a child.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

Joe108Person was signed in when posted  842
10-30-2006 01:30 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-30-2006 02:33 AM
Just recently, the Anti-Sai Siamese-Twins (Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard) publicly humiliated Sanjay and gave him a whopping blow to the face when they said the following (in response to Venkataraman's stories about Lord Rama's drama with Ravana, Sabari, Jatayu, Sugriva, etc., in the Ramayana):
"Nor can any intelligent person make good or relevant sense of it in the modern world – it is just a fantastic, impossible concocted story of the 'Superman' kind – with 'monkey-man' Hanuman lifting and flying aloft with a whole mountain (so Rama could pick out a herb from it!) or jumping across the sea to Sri Lanka. Come on, how can one be so backward intellectually? This may be o.k. for ignorant peasants, but the thinking world must regard it as sheer delusion!"

Did you get that Sanjay?
...it is just a fantastic, impossible concocted story of the 'Superman' kind...

Come on, how can one be so backward intellectually?

This may be o.k. for ignorant peasants, but the thinking world must regard it as sheer delusion!


The reason why this is so amusing is because Sanjay is a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who happens to be one those "backward intellectually" "ignorant peasants" who believes in "impossible concocted stories of the 'Superman' kind"!

That's right, Sanjay fully believes that the Ramayana, Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam are Divine Scriptures that document literal and historical miracles, lilas, manifestations and paranormal events in the lives of Avatars (incarnations of God). Sanjay fully believes in the "superman" miracles and stories attributed to Lord Ramachandra, Lord Krishna, Hanuman (the Monkey God) etc. As a matter of fact, Sanjay engaged me in a fierce debate in which he defended his belief that Lord Krishna literally manifested 16,000 human forms, married 16,000 separate wives and procreated with each one of them producing innumerable offspring!

What makes this even more weird is that Sanjay is a staunch defender of the same people (Priddy & Pittard) who openly mock his religious beliefs!

Niiiiiiice friends you have there, Sanjay. lol

Sanjay is the black sheep of the Anti-Sai Movement. Keeping in perfect form with his outcast role, Sanjay bleets "Baa Baa" "Baa Baa", obsessively tracking every bit of information relating to Sathya Sai Baba so he can twist it for his Anti-Sai friends who use him for their own nefarious ends.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: » /m272
» "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

RSS link What's this?
   << 843-858  827-842 of 2980  811-826 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.