QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
$39 July special! Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro
Topic: Sathya Sai Baba 2005: Who Is He?
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 817-832  801-816 of 2980  785-800 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top    (not accepting new messages)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  801
10-27-2006 10:47 PM ET (US)
/m799

Sanjay, you seem to forget you are the one rehashing old stuff that has already been dealt with. You are the only one who thinks they are "new" facts since you are just getting around to reading stuff many of us read YEARS ago. Sounds like you didn't do much reading as a devotee. Probably because you were too busy with your porn fetishes.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  802
10-27-2006 10:48 PM ET (US)
Josephine Kabutla 642
 
10-20-2006 12:21 PM ET (US)

Edward 643
 
10-20-2006 12:29 PM ET (US)

Josephine Kabutla = Edward
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  803
10-27-2006 10:50 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:51 PM
"you recently decided that Edward was 'usedbybaba'"

___________


well , usedbybaba posted as Edward at least once,like yesterday or the day before i think.
The time frame says so.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  804
10-27-2006 10:52 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:53 PM
If anybody can point me to a source where I can get a copy of Narasimha Swamiji's 'Guide to Shirdi' which was published in 1947, please email me at saibabaexposed@gmail.com.

Let's just say that I have a very big hunch. :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  805
10-27-2006 10:56 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:57 PM
Sanjay, you have not retracted anything!

"somewhat exaggerated"? Tell us what parts were not "somewhat exaggerated"?

And since you are now conceding that your bold-face lie was "somewhat exaggerated", you have made the case for me that there is no proof that Sathya Sai Baba raped or sexually abused any children, despite your repeated claims that he is a "paedophile homosexual". Support your claims that Sathya Sai Baba is a "pedophile homosexual". And I am asking for proof, not your speculations, assumptions, conspiracy theories and the like. Proof! Where is it?

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  806
10-27-2006 10:59 PM ET (US)
"I already know all of your different IDs. "
___________

Lol, no ,of course you don't ,some of them i haven't ever used to post in any of the groups but i use roboform so i refresh them occasionally so they wouldn't expire.



"which you are perfectly willing to use in deception"
_________

what deception?I'm wiling to use usernames i have i don't see anything deceptive about that,LOL,besides that's not your group,the guy who calls prophet Mohamed a pedophile created it,right?

"and it was somehow delayed in one of Yaho's backlogs."
____________

yeah right just in time to coincide with Edward's posts on 2 occasions on 2 different days.
LOL.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  807
10-27-2006 10:59 PM ET (US)
Kristijan, and you are posting at the same time as me. Does this mean you and I are one? After all, the time frame says so. *rolls eyes* This is not very intelligent and you have no proof that Edward or Josephine are anybody else but themselves. But anyway, you continue to believe whatever you like. :-)

Carbon Dioxide (/m801), excuse me? Nobody has addressed either the Shirdi Lies or the School Lies before it was brought up by yours truly. So tough luck! And it's not like I'm expecting any real response either, because all the books that you claim to have read all replicated the same lies. Speaking of which, do not get into a competition with me. You clearly haven't seen my library of Sai books, especially now that it has had significant additions from fellow ex-devotees who wanted to get rid of theirs. :-)
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  808
10-27-2006 11:05 PM ET (US)
"Kristijan, and you are posting at the same time as me. Does this mean you and I are one? After all, the time frame says so. *rolls eyes* This is not very intelligent and you have no proof that Edward or Josephine are anybody else but themselves. But anyway, you continue to believe whatever you like. :-)"
__________________________

you don't have to be intelligent to get it.
This place is deserted pretty much,only few ppl here,but out of nowhere
2 times they posted few minutes apart about the same thing which you constantly mention and praise (BBC documentary)and at the same time you posted on sssb2 (daytime in Europe).
LOL
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  809
10-27-2006 11:07 PM ET (US)
Dadlani, what do you think about hariharan aka usedbybaba and his allegations ,do you believe his accusations?
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  810
10-27-2006 11:08 PM ET (US)
Kristijan, for God's sake, I'm not interested in your irrelevant talking! Quit it already.

Homoreno (/m805), you can consier anything you want to be a "bold-faced lie" since you have already been exposed as nitpicker extraordinaire, who thinks that any mistake, exaggeration or suggestion is a "lie". What to speak of all of your own lies. I'm not conceding anything, but I wouldn't blame you if you took that position, rather like I "conceded" that the Streetbitches blog was mine when I never said anything in that vein, you deceitful liar you! :-))

You want proof? I've told you many, many times already, which you have never addressed: We do not have to give proof to you because you are not an official or reputable agent for Sathya Sai Baba. All civic, federal and national authorities who need to know the facts have been aprrised of the proof that you are so desperately begging for, despite your lack of qualifications. You have no proof that children were not abused by Sathya Sai Baba; anything that you have stated is your own opinion and which is not backed up by any facts. Before you talk about assumptions, speculations and conspiracy theories, take a good long look at yours and see how laughable, hilarious and weak they are.

Maybe then you'll get your proof, and only if you ask nicely with a 'please' and a 'thank you' like anyone with manners would do. :-)

Last post for tonight. Don't forget to email me if you have any information about Narasimha Swami's 'Guide to Shirdi' that was published in 1947. I have a hunch that I'm sure I'm right about something. :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  811
10-27-2006 11:10 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 11:11 PM
My last post (/m810) was posted before I say /m809. I haven't been following usedbybaba's accusations because they take up too much of this board's archives. Try listing all of them with all of the "refutations" from the devotees and I'll think about it.

I'm not interested if he is using different IDs or not, nobody cares about that. Goodnight.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  812
10-27-2006 11:11 PM ET (US)
To the contrary Sanjay (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED"), I have wholly refuted your lamentable "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" which almost exclusively relied on Sai Devotees and LIMF (by your own admission). Funny enough, when it comes to Shirdi Baba, you cited LIMF and Sai Devotees as reliable, accurate, honest and objective sources. However, you recently trashed and bashed LIMF as "bullshit" and Sai Devotees as "liars". Which means, of course, that you just refuted all those articles yourself.

And my article is almost done about Baba's birthdate. It is scathing! Coming soon.

- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 1
- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 2
- Shirdi Sai Baba Imbroglio: Part 3

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  813
10-27-2006 11:12 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 11:20 PM
"Kristijan, for God's sake, I'm not interested in your irrelevant talking! Quit it already."

________________

and it seems nobody is interested in reading and commenting your stuff,the way you'd like , so you've created prince Edward and Josephine????
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  814
10-27-2006 11:17 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 11:19 PM
"I haven't been following usedbybaba's accusations because they take up too much of this board's archives. Try listing all of them with all of the "refutations" from the devotees and I'll think about it.

I'm not interested if he is using different IDs or not, nobody cares about that. Goodnight."

____________

but wasn't quick topic mentioned on exbaba?
it seems as if ubb made a large portion of the comments on that board throughout the years,
Goodnight.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  815
10-27-2006 11:19 PM ET (US)
Re /m810

Thank you Sanjay. You are saying that all the allegations made against Sathya Sai Baba being a "pedophile" have no proof to back them up whatsoever. It is all "secret", just like all the other alleged "proof" Anti-Sai Activists claim they have against Sathya Sai Baba. Strange enough, all those parents whose children have allegedly been sexually abuse by Baba have done absolutely nothing about it in the past 6 years. No police complaints. No court cases. Nothing. And you can always provide your "proof" for others here to see. You can't do it and neither can anyone else. I know why: Because there is no proof against Sathya Sai Baba. Nothing. Zilch. Nada.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

CO2000Person was signed in when posted  816
10-28-2006 01:17 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-28-2006 01:20 AM
/m799

Kind of like the abuse you are so good at meting out, eh Dadlani? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Maybe while you are seeing that counsellor, you can get him to teach you how to look at (and take responsibility for) your own projections so you can quit blaming others for your own faults.
RSS link What's this?
   << 817-832  801-816 of 2980  785-800 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2006 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.