QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Sathya Sai Baba 2005: Who Is He?
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 812-827  796-811 of 2980  780-795 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom    (not accepting new messages)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  811
10-27-2006 11:10 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 11:11 PM
My last post (/m810) was posted before I say /m809. I haven't been following usedbybaba's accusations because they take up too much of this board's archives. Try listing all of them with all of the "refutations" from the devotees and I'll think about it.

I'm not interested if he is using different IDs or not, nobody cares about that. Goodnight.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  810
10-27-2006 11:08 PM ET (US)
Kristijan, for God's sake, I'm not interested in your irrelevant talking! Quit it already.

Homoreno (/m805), you can consier anything you want to be a "bold-faced lie" since you have already been exposed as nitpicker extraordinaire, who thinks that any mistake, exaggeration or suggestion is a "lie". What to speak of all of your own lies. I'm not conceding anything, but I wouldn't blame you if you took that position, rather like I "conceded" that the Streetbitches blog was mine when I never said anything in that vein, you deceitful liar you! :-))

You want proof? I've told you many, many times already, which you have never addressed: We do not have to give proof to you because you are not an official or reputable agent for Sathya Sai Baba. All civic, federal and national authorities who need to know the facts have been aprrised of the proof that you are so desperately begging for, despite your lack of qualifications. You have no proof that children were not abused by Sathya Sai Baba; anything that you have stated is your own opinion and which is not backed up by any facts. Before you talk about assumptions, speculations and conspiracy theories, take a good long look at yours and see how laughable, hilarious and weak they are.

Maybe then you'll get your proof, and only if you ask nicely with a 'please' and a 'thank you' like anyone with manners would do. :-)

Last post for tonight. Don't forget to email me if you have any information about Narasimha Swami's 'Guide to Shirdi' that was published in 1947. I have a hunch that I'm sure I'm right about something. :-)
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  809
10-27-2006 11:07 PM ET (US)
Dadlani, what do you think about hariharan aka usedbybaba and his allegations ,do you believe his accusations?
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  808
10-27-2006 11:05 PM ET (US)
"Kristijan, and you are posting at the same time as me. Does this mean you and I are one? After all, the time frame says so. *rolls eyes* This is not very intelligent and you have no proof that Edward or Josephine are anybody else but themselves. But anyway, you continue to believe whatever you like. :-)"
__________________________

you don't have to be intelligent to get it.
This place is deserted pretty much,only few ppl here,but out of nowhere
2 times they posted few minutes apart about the same thing which you constantly mention and praise (BBC documentary)and at the same time you posted on sssb2 (daytime in Europe).
LOL
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  807
10-27-2006 10:59 PM ET (US)
Kristijan, and you are posting at the same time as me. Does this mean you and I are one? After all, the time frame says so. *rolls eyes* This is not very intelligent and you have no proof that Edward or Josephine are anybody else but themselves. But anyway, you continue to believe whatever you like. :-)

Carbon Dioxide (/m801), excuse me? Nobody has addressed either the Shirdi Lies or the School Lies before it was brought up by yours truly. So tough luck! And it's not like I'm expecting any real response either, because all the books that you claim to have read all replicated the same lies. Speaking of which, do not get into a competition with me. You clearly haven't seen my library of Sai books, especially now that it has had significant additions from fellow ex-devotees who wanted to get rid of theirs. :-)
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  806
10-27-2006 10:59 PM ET (US)
"I already know all of your different IDs. "
___________

Lol, no ,of course you don't ,some of them i haven't ever used to post in any of the groups but i use roboform so i refresh them occasionally so they wouldn't expire.



"which you are perfectly willing to use in deception"
_________

what deception?I'm wiling to use usernames i have i don't see anything deceptive about that,LOL,besides that's not your group,the guy who calls prophet Mohamed a pedophile created it,right?

"and it was somehow delayed in one of Yaho's backlogs."
____________

yeah right just in time to coincide with Edward's posts on 2 occasions on 2 different days.
LOL.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  805
10-27-2006 10:56 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:57 PM
Sanjay, you have not retracted anything!

"somewhat exaggerated"? Tell us what parts were not "somewhat exaggerated"?

And since you are now conceding that your bold-face lie was "somewhat exaggerated", you have made the case for me that there is no proof that Sathya Sai Baba raped or sexually abused any children, despite your repeated claims that he is a "paedophile homosexual". Support your claims that Sathya Sai Baba is a "pedophile homosexual". And I am asking for proof, not your speculations, assumptions, conspiracy theories and the like. Proof! Where is it?

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  804
10-27-2006 10:52 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:53 PM
If anybody can point me to a source where I can get a copy of Narasimha Swamiji's 'Guide to Shirdi' which was published in 1947, please email me at saibabaexposed@gmail.com.

Let's just say that I have a very big hunch. :-)
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  803
10-27-2006 10:50 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:51 PM
"you recently decided that Edward was 'usedbybaba'"

___________


well , usedbybaba posted as Edward at least once,like yesterday or the day before i think.
The time frame says so.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  802
10-27-2006 10:48 PM ET (US)
Josephine Kabutla 642
 
10-20-2006 12:21 PM ET (US)

Edward 643
 
10-20-2006 12:29 PM ET (US)

Josephine Kabutla = Edward
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  801
10-27-2006 10:47 PM ET (US)
/m799

Sanjay, you seem to forget you are the one rehashing old stuff that has already been dealt with. You are the only one who thinks they are "new" facts since you are just getting around to reading stuff many of us read YEARS ago. Sounds like you didn't do much reading as a devotee. Probably because you were too busy with your porn fetishes.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  800
10-27-2006 10:45 PM ET (US)
/m796

"LOL... i think you're Edward,"

Do I look like I care what you think? Bear in mind that you recently decided that Edward was 'usedbybaba'. You change your opinion with the wind and nobody cares anymore about what you think with your crackpot ideas. When everyone else seems to be accepting Edward as an independent person. Your history in this is not very good.

"few times that he replied he posted at the same time you did on ssb2. Usually you post late at night but at those times both of you posted during afternoon.What a coincidence.You usually don't do that."

And this is further proof that you don't even know what you're talking about. For the record, I did not and do not come online in the daytimes. If you are referring to my post on SSB2 (sending a link to a weblog), then you obviously weren't smart enough to figure out that it was posted the previous night, and it was somehow delayed in one of Yaho's backlogs. Please ignore the times when your posts were caught up in Yahoo's backlogs and showed up several hours after they were posted, it doesn't matter because I must have posted in the afternoon in contrary to my usual practice. *rolls eyes* Get a life and discuss some issues about Sai Baba, you're really becoming extremely boring when you clog up this board with your ridiculous fight with usedbybaba.

"btw..i have multiple usernames in that group and it's gonna be so different"

Nice to know that you also have multiple usernames which you are perfectly willing to use in deception. :-) Maybe you are Edward? :-)

I already know all of your different IDs. Break the rules and get banned and all of your IDs will get banned. Your silly games won't work. You just don't get it, do you?
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  799
10-27-2006 10:39 PM ET (US)
/m794

"The links you provided did not address your claim that Sathya Sai Baba (actual quote) "rapes boys as young as three" (Reference)."

Looks like Gerald 'Joe' Moreno is the only lying drunk around here, because he clearly couldn't read this:

"Four years ago in the public discussions boards, I made a statement about Sai Baba's homosexual paedophilia behaviour that included a claim about the Baba's rapes of little children as young as three years old ... Looking back on this topic, I now realise that this statement was somewhat exaggerated in the context of regular discussion of other victims of Sai Baba's sexual abuse. I have also since come to recognise that Sai Baba's abuse may not only be characterised as sexual abuse, but may take many other forms such as verbal abuse, emotional abuse, emotional blackmail, physical abuse (as in violence) and general manipulation."


If Gerald wants to quibble about details or exaggerations, as well as argue about the difference between raping a child versus beating him black and blue, let him entier an Abuse Support Forum and broadcast his views there just to see what kind of reactions he will get. :-) Clearly, anyone with a brain can see that his arguments have no merits. And above all, he didn't address anything about the point of Sai Baba's vicious and animalistic sadistic beating and torture of a 3 year old child.

And by the way, Homoreno, you are the only one here trying to suck up to Edward. Even after you viciously insulted him by barking insults into his face like a mad dog, all because he made a chance commentabout you being on drugs (which may not be too far from the truth), you still tried/try to smear me even after he has already declared that he is not interested in anything that you have to say. Tough luck. Edward's opinion of you is the same as Abulafia's, Guru Beau Peep, Guruphiliac and anybody else who thinks that you are off your head. Even Sathya Sai Baba cringes in embarrassment everytime you open your mouth, since you are a clearly confused clown who cannot explain your investment in him. *shrugs* Oh dear.

Keep on rehashing old stuff instead of being forced to deal with new facts and running away. I no longer care for your pathetic and childish games. :-)

By the way, you do realise that your pink and red text make you look like even more of a homosexual than you already are? :-)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  798
10-27-2006 10:27 PM ET (US)
/m797

And don't forget Dadlani also intimated that Jesus might have been a pedophile (while making lewd comments about the religious photos) on that other
now-defunct message board.

Sanjay seems to project his own dark motivations onto everyone else. O'Clery seemed to do the same thing.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  797
10-27-2006 10:11 PM ET (US)
Sanjay, stop trying to suck up to Edward. He is too religious to accept you after you lusted after his chosen savior, Jesus Christ, and even requested "naughty" pictures of Jesus to satisfy your Jesus-Sex-Fetishist.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  796
10-27-2006 10:10 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:24 PM
"Kristijan, you're now on Stage 2. I've told you before."
_____________________


LOL... i think you're Edward, few times that he replied he posted at the same time you did on ssb2.Usually you post late at night but at those times both of you posted during afternoon.What a coincidence.You usually don't do that.
btw..i have multiple usernames in that group and it's gonna be so different
When I'm on the stage tonight the Super Trouper lights are gonna find me
Shining like the sun Smiling, having fun Feeling like a number one!
RSS link What's this?
   << 812-827  796-811 of 2980  780-795 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.