Edited by author 10-27-2006 08:23 PM
if you start reading the other thread from the beginning ,you'll notice eventhough sometimes it took weeks or months for somebody to post in many cases whenever there's a negative comment posted ,few replies follow immediately few minutes later and they're posted under different usernames.
It's obviously 1 person 80% of the time replying to himself and it seems it's the same person all these years.

/m743

"Now you are convinced that somebody else with an entirely different username is pretending to be you, without at all considering the possibility that some other Croatian people may want to post on discussion boards."

_____________________________________

yes ,usedbybaba pretended to be me,it's obvious.
Also i noticed the original post was edited 22 hours later,
God knows what he posted in first version.



"sad3 272
09-19-2006 06:18 AM ET (US)
 Edited by author 09-20-2006 04:51 AM
hi! me again! I just want to say I did not want anyone to feel hurt, or attact. all this is hard for me to. By the way, Joe 108 says: anonimus ill people. I am just a student from Croatia, 25 old. I will not be sanding any messegas more, I realy need someone sirius,so that I can talk about this. This kind a conversation is not something I am used to. At the end I used to say :sai ram, but now only,bye "

"BTW, Angelic, I have been looking over usedbybaba's posts on the other board and this one and first he said he only gave a blow job once ("it was a one time job," was the way he phrased it), then he said he did it "a few times," so his story changes on a regular basis."
_____________


forget the blow job,"hariharan" was "PIERCING HIM ".

Yeah, the internet draws a lot of immature wackos who like to play games under anonymous names. Internet is the perfect play ground for con artists to find gullible victims.

i wonder what Sanjay thinks about this character.I guess he believes him unconditionally.

Edited by author 10-27-2006 03:47 PM
It doesn't matter how many contradictions and obvious lies you point out to Sanjay and his true believer buddies, they still believe anything they hear, regardless of the provable facts, as long as it's negative.

They took a wrong turn at the very beginning by not dealing with the issue as to why none of these complainants have ever filed charges and never asking any hard questions of the accusers or vetting for mental problems. You are not allowed to ask the accusers (ALL grown men, mind you) tough questions because they are "abuse victims" and it will "traumatize them" (roll eyes). However, it's perfectly ok for them to traumatize everyone else with their unprovable accusations, lies and abuse.

I've never seen so many whiney grown men with such poor excuses.

Edited by author 10-27-2006 08:34 PM
Edward, sorry for not answering your questions earlier. The cut-and-thrust of the "discussions" here make me lose track and I sometimes have to review what I've missed. Yesterday I was tired and didn't bother coming online at all.

Anyway, as per your question, I appreciate that you find it hard to understand the latest School Lies exposure because it is rather complicated, at least with all the new information that has turned up. Basically the situation is like this; every Sai devotee has been taught from the beginning that Sai Baba was born on November 23rd 1926. Because Sai Baba is revered as an incarnation of God on earth, his birthday has premier status and it is the most-attended festival in his ashram drawing crowds of several million. The birthday is actually a holy day (being the "birthday" of "God" and consequently the lives of every devotee revolves around it. Here in the UK, I have already seen posters at street stores advertising the upcoming birthday festivals where they're all gearing up to celebrate it.

New information has turned up that strongly suggests that Sai Baba's real birthdate is Ocotber 4th, 1929. This idea was first mooted in 2002 with the discovery of Sai Baba's school record when he attended school at Bukkapatnam (a village opposite his home town of Puttaparthi). Several objections have been made against the authenticity of this school record by several people. However, even newer information (released for the first time on the Internet by yours truly) corroborate the 1929 birthdate as true and authentic, mainly by the production of Sai Baba's transfer certificate from the Kamalapuram school to the Bukkapatnam school, and also by the school record from his school at Uravakonda. Sai Baba's education was frequently disrupted because he was in the charge of his elder brother, a teacher, who was himself frequently transferred to work at different schools. So Sai Baba attended four schools in all - Puttaparthi, Kamalapuram, Bukkapatnam, Uravakonda.

Naturally I can't just post this evidence without checking out first, and so I did my own investigation by researching the "official biographies" (sloppy writing as they are) as well as the unofficial ones, and I have found that there are several great reasons for why the 1929 birthdate is the correct one. The objections against the 1929 birthdate have been thoroughly discounted as being unfeasible.

I appreciate that this issue is not as "exciting" as Sai Baba's homosexual paedophila and murders etc., but as I have been saying for a long time the Sai Exposé is multi-faceted and it is not always about sex. For example, my personal taste is to discover and comment on the Baba's philosophical and theological discrepancies. Originally my blog was meant for this purpose as well as to work out some of my own trauma processing, but it has not grown into a big tree where everything is discovered and reported. The importance of this School Lies issue was necessary because of the earlier Shirdi Lies exposé, where Sathya Sai Baba's claims to be the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai Baba have been proven to be false using many new evidences and new information from Shirdi sources. That Shirdi Lies exposure already turned up the information that the "declaration" took place in 1943 instead of the official line of 1940. That's why the point behind the School Lies was to show how Sai Baba was in school in 1940 and thus could not have declared himself as Shirdi Sai reborn until 1943. As far as I am concerned it is a done deal; there is already a large body of evidence that proves that Sathya Sai's history is fraudulent and contrived, and there is much more to come. This is very powerful and I am encouraged when I think that the exposure of these issues will break the backbone of the Sai Organisation, at least philosophically.

Hope that explained it for you Edward, and sorry again for not replying earlier. Speaking of which, I see from the recent activity on this board that brainwashed and demented Sai devotees have succeeded in ruining this board (like they do to every other board) by engaging in distracting and irrelevant topics. That's when they are not launching ad-hominem attacks at all who do not agree with their views. This is pure cowardice and weak tactics because they are completely unable to come up with any form of proof or defence that their pervert guru is not innocent of everything that he is charged with, so they try to shift the focus instead by repeating the same things over and over again that are completely irrelevant and have been fully addressed many times before in the past. Childish, fanatical and deranged behaviour.

So I have created a new QuickTopic board: Sai Baba EXPOSED!, you're very welcome to post there and have a discussion. That invitation is open to everyone else too, so long as they discuss the issues and lay off all irrelevant talk. By the way, I notice from your words that you are something of a devout Christian (and that you have also received some stick for it). You might be interested in taking a look at this: Sai Baba's Contradictions on Jesus Christ.

Edited by author 10-27-2006 08:47 PM
Perhaps Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") (the fully exposed Jesus-Sex-Fetishist) can provide us the PROOF that Sathya Sai Baba has engaged in "homosexual paedophila and murders"? I have been asking for proof for years and Sanjay and his group of thugs can only offer speculations, conspiracy theories, assumptions and the like. Of course, Sanjay is the same liar who claimed that Sathya Sai Baba raped children 3 years of age (when no one ever supported him in this claim, even Anti-Sai Activists).

There is no believing a Pathological Liar like Sanjay.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba Exposed") Blog

Edited by author 10-27-2006 09:21 PM
/m790
<cinnamonshops@...> wrote:
please!!! anyone spending so much time trying to find
a date of birth??? Does Not HAve a Life.
who gives a shit????? do u think all the sick poor
people who go to the super speciality hospital when
they're gravely ill are going to stop and say: hey did
u read saiexposanada's research about swami's birth
day descrepency??????....uhh lets not go to this
hospital cause the date's wrong.........duhh
do u think when someones ray of hope is swami, is
going to care two hoots about this research?????
A few people I know above 65 who were born in rural
india, told me there's allways descrepencies with
birth certificates and what they call school leaving
certificates.
Basically what these critics are doing is shooting
arrows in darkness. .
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibab...onclub/message/6954

Edited by author 10-27-2006 09:49 PM
As I just stated, devotees of Sathya Sai Baba have nothing better to do than to deflect and shift the focus onto issues that are irrelevant to the Baba. :-) That's when they are not engaging in ad-hominem attacks as part of said deflection, in order to mask an impotent and weak defence of the Baba that does not answer any of the major current points without rehashing those dealt with in the past. :-)

As regards the abuse of the 3-year-old child, this has already been dealt with, duh. And don't forget to read the update. No one can deny my vindication :-), and nobody can deny that Sathya Sai Baba is an evil, sadistic pervert who viciously harmed little children without remorse. Yes, even as young as three.

Edward, I forgot to mention that the reason why Sathya Sai Baba's birthday was shifted from October 4th 1929 to November 23rd 1926 was because they wanted to capitalise on a cryptic statement by Sri Aurobindo, who was a very famous saint in those times. Apparently Aurobindo had come out on the November 24th 1926 and declared to his followers about how "Krishna Consciousness" had descended into the physical. Incorrigible Sai devotee claim (flasely) that this refers to the descent of God that supposedly took place on the previous day. We now know that this wholly untrue since Sai Baba was born in 1929, and that Aurobindo's followers widely accept this cryptic remark as referreing to the descent of "Krishna Consciousness" into himself. :-)

Kristijan, you're now on Stage 2. I've told you before. Nice to know you've come out in support of a known racist, by the way.

Sanjay, you not only a pathological liar, you are obviously drunk off your feet.

The links you provided did not address your claim that Sathya Sai Baba (actual quote) "rapes boys as young as three" (Reference).

In the articles you cited from your blog, you claimed that a 3 year old child was beaten, not raped, as you earlier claimed. And you said "boys" (plural, not singular). Once again, you have exposed yourself as a pathetic liar! Where is the proof that Sathya Sai Baba "rapes boys as young as three"?

Where did you get this information from (since you were the only person who made this claim)? Since you have nothing to hide, you should provide your proof here so everyone can see what an honest, forthcoming and decent person you are. What are you waiting for? Do it.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

Edited by author 03-03-2008 01:23 AM
/m791


Notice how Dadlani says, "I appreciate this issue is not as exciting as Sai Baba's homosexual pedophilia..." So the sicko admits he is involved in this because it is "exciting," NOT because he is interesting in the TRUTH.

Dadlani the hypocrite's main weapon is ad hominem attacks, i.e. calling people names (i.e., homoreno, etc.). His second weapon of choice is mocking people and acting like he is a great brain who knows everything, when in reality he is one of the dumbest anti-Sais. Yet the coward whines like a crybaby when his tactics and continuous lies continually come back to haunt him (and rightly so). I don't even bother to read his garbage anymore as it is a waste of time trying to wade through his idiocy and he is using it as an attention-seeking device. Dadlani's continual lies and one-sided misrepresentations prove he is not at all interested in the truth.

Can you imagine what his life is like off of the internet if he acts like this in the non-cyber world?


Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba

Edited by author 10-27-2006 10:24 PM
"Kristijan, you're now on Stage 2. I've told you before."
_____________________


LOL... i think you're Edward, few times that he replied he posted at the same time you did on ssb2.Usually you post late at night but at those times both of you posted during afternoon.What a coincidence.You usually don't do that.
btw..i have multiple usernames in that group and it's gonna be so different
When I'm on the stage tonight the Super Trouper lights are gonna find me
Shining like the sun Smiling, having fun Feeling like a number one!

Sanjay, stop trying to suck up to Edward. He is too religious to accept you after you lusted after his chosen savior, Jesus Christ, and even requested "naughty" pictures of Jesus to satisfy your Jesus-Sex-Fetishist.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272
"Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed

/m797

And don't forget Dadlani also intimated that Jesus might have been a pedophile (while making lewd comments about the religious photos) on that other
now-defunct message board.

Sanjay seems to project his own dark motivations onto everyone else. O'Clery seemed to do the same thing.

/m794

"The links you provided did not address your claim that Sathya Sai Baba (actual quote) "rapes boys as young as three" (Reference)."

Looks like Gerald 'Joe' Moreno is the only lying drunk around here, because he clearly couldn't read this:

"Four years ago in the public discussions boards, I made a statement about Sai Baba's homosexual paedophilia behaviour that included a claim about the Baba's rapes of little children as young as three years old ... Looking back on this topic, I now realise that this statement was somewhat exaggerated in the context of regular discussion of other victims of Sai Baba's sexual abuse. I have also since come to recognise that Sai Baba's abuse may not only be characterised as sexual abuse, but may take many other forms such as verbal abuse, emotional abuse, emotional blackmail, physical abuse (as in violence) and general manipulation."

If Gerald wants to quibble about details or exaggerations, as well as argue about the difference between raping a child versus beating him black and blue, let him entier an Abuse Support Forum and broadcast his views there just to see what kind of reactions he will get. :-) Clearly, anyone with a brain can see that his arguments have no merits. And above all, he didn't address anything about the point of Sai Baba's vicious and animalistic sadistic beating and torture of a 3 year old child.

And by the way, Homoreno, you are the only one here trying to suck up to Edward. Even after you viciously insulted him by barking insults into his face like a mad dog, all because he made a chance commentabout you being on drugs (which may not be too far from the truth), you still tried/try to smear me even after he has already declared that he is not interested in anything that you have to say. Tough luck. Edward's opinion of you is the same as Abulafia's, Guru Beau Peep, Guruphiliac and anybody else who thinks that you are off your head. Even Sathya Sai Baba cringes in embarrassment everytime you open your mouth, since you are a clearly confused clown who cannot explain your investment in him. *shrugs* Oh dear.

Keep on rehashing old stuff instead of being forced to deal with new facts and running away. I no longer care for your pathetic and childish games. :-)

By the way, you do realise that your pink and red text make you look like even more of a homosexual than you already are? :-)