/m689

"It is also apparent that the inaccurate birthdate was copied to other school records from a primary one."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha, Moreno's argument is changing with the wind! Stop talking bullshit, Moreno, LOL! The earliest (English) record is the Kamalapuram transfer form, which has the same birthdate as the Bukkapatnam record. Whaddya know? The same birthdate occurs in the Uravakonda school records. And Moreno wants us to think that these records were copied from each other at a time when it was very difficult to travel by bullock cart, let alone by foot.

Stop talking bullshit and stop trying to play with the big boys you silly little amateur. Get lost when the men are talking, LOL.

Homoreno, give it up/ :-) I'm not interested in discussing this topic with an ignorant bozo like you. :-) You do not even know the basic details about Indian education, which leads you to make wild conclusions that would make any Indian laugh. I should know, because I've refuted all your "objections" and been getting some good feedback from Indian readers. Did you know that readers from India are the second largest readers of my blog, the first being USA? LOL. :-)

Keep humiliating yourself by talking about how great/bad LIMF is. I've also mentioned the way you cried like a little girl about how expensive it was. :-) Give it up. Sai Baba was born in 1929. Plenty of evidence makes it sensible. It's all over. First Sai Baba lived in caves, then Sai Baba was inbred, then Sai Baba lied about Shirdi reincarnations, and now his birthdate has been exposed as a lie after six entire decades. :-)

Homoreno, you're so thick that you don't even know that 8th Standard is "Form One", that is why in the Bukkapatnam school record, Raju is listed as being admitted into the 8th Stndard and all the other kids ar ein Form One. It's the same. LOL, Thickhead. :-)

re /m688

Now Sanjay is bashing the "devotee editors" of LIMF! lol

What did I tell you? Sanjay bashes / accepts LIMF according to whatever whim he decides to take flight on. One word: Hypocrite.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

Edited by author 10-24-2006 01:57 AM
Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") is "thick".

IF Talipineni Kesappa has been "discredited", then this is proof that LIMF relied on faulty, inaccurate and unreliable information. Therefore, Sanjay's "Sai Baba Shirdi Lies" is all based on faulty, inaccurate and unreliable information.

It is also apparent that the inaccurate birthdate was copied to other school records from a primary one. Once again, this info is taken from LIMF that Sanjay formerly argued was reliable, accurate, objective and truthful. Now, however, Sanjay is saying that when it comes to information that disputes his "proof", LIMF is NOT reliable, accurate, objective and truthful. Sanjay is a self-serving hypocrite.

Gee Sanjay, you are such a flip-flopper. But then again, what to expect from a fully exposed pervert, drunk, racist, misogynist and pathological liar such as yourself? Nothing you say is reliable. Not even one word.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

"The devotee editors of LIMF attempt to present an unconvincing argument to explain away the glaring date discrepancy by referring to the allegedly relaxed recording of census information in pre-Independence India and why dates and birth registrations were carried out much later after the fact. This conflicts with their earlier insinuation that Raju's family deliberately engaged in deception in order to facilitate his so-called career prospects by making him appear younger. Of course nobody would begrudge any parents their ambitions for their children, and indeed it is related that Raju's parents wished for him to be highly educated so that he could attain a prestigious job working for local government. This argument flies right out of the window when you consider that changing the birth year to 1929 (supposedly three years "younger" than his "original" year of 1926) did him a disservice after all; both the Bukkapatnam and Uravakonda records show that most of Raju's classmates were born in the early to mid-1930s. If the family were deliberately trying to fix his date, they should have thought about bringing it forward into the early 1930s so that Raju could be on a par with his own classmates, putting aside the possibility that their birthdates were faked too. With their "faked" date of 1929, they ended up making Raju look like one of the older children!" - Source

LOL. :-)

Edited by author 10-24-2006 01:48 AM
It's official.

Gerald Moreno is THICK.

He keeps on citing his "Talipineni Kesappa" quote which has already been discredited in the back archives of this forum (check them out).

Three independent pieces of evidence list Sai Baba's DOB as 4.10.1929, even spelling it out for those who are thick. :-) The 1939 birthdate is obviously an error which was corrected. Erlendur Haraldsson (one of Moreno's big heroes) himself wrote of a discrepancy, stating that either Kasturi got the date wrong or Sai Baba was 13 years old at the time of the declaration. It doesn't matter, because Sai baba was 14 years old (as biographers say) in 1943, meaning he was born in 1929. Simple mathematics. :-)

Plenty of other evidences have proved the 1929 birthdate. LIMF's "reason" is bullshit, and they have made many more bullshit explanations, all of which have been discussed and dismissed in my exposé series. I personally do not care, it is a problem for devotees not for me. LOL.

No more arguments.

Sathya Sai Baba was born on

October 4th 1929. :-)

LIMF also gave a reason for the birthdate discrepancy. Since Sanjay accepts the authors of LIMF as being reliable, accurate, objective and truthful people, then the following comment must also be accepted on the authority of the authors of LIMF:

"Sathya's date of birth in school records, however, is recorded as the 4th of October 1929 - and not the traditionally recognized date of the 23rd of November 1926. Talipineni Kesappa, son of Talipineni Ramappa maintains that Sathya was one year senior to him at school; therefore, Kesappa's date of birth being 11th of June 1927, Sathya's year of birth definitely is 1926. It has long been a practice in the schools to record a date of birth as being much later than the 'actual' date of birth - in order to facilitate career prospects. Sathya's parents wanted Sathya to become an educated officer. This, possibly could be the reason for the discrepancy. In addition, in 1926, people in remote villages like Puttaparthi, in pre-independent India, were not very particular about dates and birth registration was done much later." (Reference)

The school records are inaccurate and one of the records even stated that Baba was born in 1939. lol Sanjay cannot definitively conclude anything but his speculation. Period.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

Too Funny.

Once Again: It is nothing less than hypocritical that Sanjay is still citing LIMF as a reliable, honest, objective and accurate book relating to information about Sathya Sai Baba. The implications of Sanjay's acceptance of LIMF (of course) is that the astounding paranormal and psychic phenomena attributed to Sathya Sai Baba in LIMF is similarly reliable, honest, objective and accurate.

Don't you agree Sanjay? Oh wait. You already agreed with me since you keep citing LIMF as a reliable, honest, objective and accurate book. Speaks volumes about the reliability, honesty, objectivity and accuracy of Sai Devotees. Thank you Sanjay!

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

Notice how all of those posts were made on October 20th, 2006, the so-called "Avatar Day" celebrated internationally throughout the Sai Organisation as the date when Raju left home and became a full-time avatar.

Final editing was done on October 21st, 2006, which was the date of the Diwali festival. :-)

Hope you had a good Diwali, Baba! :-)

Edited by author 10-24-2006 12:40 AM
A Full Exposure of Sathya Sai Baba's date of birth and related issues and featuring never before released evidence of the Baba's school records. Complete re-evaluation of the facts in the light of new research that blows apart unquestioned and accepted histories related to the birth and school education of Sathyanarayana Raju aka Sathya Sai Baba.


A New Light - | Introduction | Bukkapatnam school record discussion | Reveals D.O.B. as October 4, 1929 | Discussion of Sri Aurobindo's cryptic remark | Aurobindo hijacked by Sai colluders | Gerald Moreno's criticisms ridiculed |


A New Light 2 - | Criticisms continued | Inconsistent entries on Bukkapatnam record | Bukkapatnam record is not fraudulent | Apologetic explanations for 1929 birthdate | Passports are not evidence of true birthdates | Explanation for Bukkapatnam inconsistent entries | 8th Standard is equal to 'Form One' | Indian education dissimilar to Western education |


A New Light 3 - | Actual sequence of Raju's education different from 'official' sources | Seshama Raju's frequent job transfers | First-time release of Kamalapuram transfer record | Reveals D.O.B. as October 4, 1929 (spelled out) | Transfer form filed after the fact | Raju transferred to Uravakonda | First-time release of Uravakonda school record | Reveals D.O.B. as October 4, 1939 (later corrected year to 1929) | Existence of all three independent evidences confirms 1929 birthdate |


A New Light 4 - | Recap of topic | Recap of apologetic explanations | Facilitation of Raju's career prospects is laughable | Vijayamma Hemchand appears to confirm 1929 birthdate | Problematic 'Declaration' date resolved with 1929 birthdate | First November 23rd Birthday celebration in 1950 | Discussion in light of Shirdi Lies | 1926 and 1940 dates declared an impossibility | Kasturi's sloppy research | Consideration of correct 'Avatar' birthday | Decades of systematic deception | Conclusion |

No more arguments.

Sathya Sai Baba was born on

October 4th 1929.

Apparently Gerald Homoreno has nothing to answer except to claim that I am drunk, in a bid to run away from the hard questions. :-)

Tough luck handbag, your lies about media bias are fully exposed. Boo hoo indeed. Look at a picture of an ocean and cry, pinkdoll, LOL. :-)

Gerald Moreno Deception /m269

Edited by author 10-24-2006 12:09 AM
Apparently Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") is posting while he is drunk again.

Poor Sanjay. Looking for some negative interaction with others because no one wants to listen to you in real life. Boo hoo.

Sanjay Dadlani: Fully Exposed: /m272

Lisa De Witt (/m671): "I NEVER said I worshiped Baba (I do NOT worship form of ANY kind)."

In that case, I'm sure you won't mind if I mention that Sai Baba is an aging, graying, balding, paralytic limp-wristed homosexual kiddie-rapist. He has a hairstyle that went out in the 1970s, he wears the same clothes every day, he gets pushed around in a wheelchair and he has rotten teeth. The guy is so damn ugly that he send shivers up people's spines when he smiles at them with his sex-hungry eyes, for Christ's sake he has a unibrow and a double chin! "God" sure is good-looking , eh? Maybe he could live in a house of mirrors if he didn't crack them all every time he smiled.

But all of this stuff shouldn't bother you bcause you don't care about form, right? :-)

And by the way, what kind of a thick and deceitful copycat are you, stealing my comments from sathyasaibaba2 and using them against usedbybaba? You have a proven history of having no original thoughts of your own, and this is just the very latest example. You are in a minority, the world does not agree with your views about Sai Baba.

And I'm glad you made that crazy comment (/m673) because it helped me to consider what a useless self-appointed jihadi Sai defender you are NOT. :-) Get a life you crazy schizo. Jesus hates you.

Edited by author 10-23-2006 11:35 PM
Gerald 'Joe' (Ho)Moreno keeps on attempting to show how the BBC worked hand-in-hand with former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba in order to present a biased documentary. If he is so concerned then why doesn't he file a complaint with OFCOM or some other independent agency?

In the meantime, here is the TRUTH behind Moreno's lies:

Gerald Moreno's Media Bias Lies :-)

Bite that.

Lisa if your joe is so clear why is that you both don't answer my question on baba, but just abuse to get away. All you both do is call people namems and when we abuse you use it to answer any sensible question.THAT IS NOT THE ANSWER.

Joe108 "You are unbelievable and no one believes you".

I repeat.

Then why are you bothered, your avatar is not harmed atall.Then allow us to write what we write instead of abusing us. Why did you create a web site if you know that nobody is going to believe us Anti sais. Scared is it? Fear that your baba wiil be exposed.By the way Babais already exposed and we are just making sure that everyone knows about it. Edit
Delete