Edited by author 10-18-2006 08:46 AM
"As far as the 15 years is concerned ,I lived more than that in Parthi "

how young exactly were you when you started living in Parthi, for what reason?
what did you do there for more then 15 years?

Edited by author 10-18-2006 06:53 PM
usedbybaba,
I'm just wondering.
At the time of your abuse...

You were an adult,so I'm just thinking,OK you did it 1 time ,you were confused and shocked and didn't know how to react ,you were caught in the heat of the moment and did what he asked you,simple as that,he was your God.OK.

you said it was nauseating.I got that.

I mean that night after it happened for the first time I'm sure you thought thoroughly about what happened and you analyzed everything over and over again.



So, can you please tell me what was the reason you returned to Sb and gave him another bj for a few more times.

It's really difficult for me to comprehend. Please I'm just trying to understand.

"Kristijan, precisely. You do not believe that they are lying. If you consider it from the other point of view, that they are lying, the whole problem is resolved. Either they are lying or they are hallucinating, the answer is along those lines."

Well, they both appear to be totally genuine ,caring people,you can just sense it ,both are well educated.
So, nope they aren't lying for sure.

Hallucination?
Yeah ,that would be my choice,but there's one problem though.
After she(L.) saw sb next to their bed at 3 AM,she woke J. up and he saw SB leaving their room.
They surely weren't hallucinating,not both of them.

Edited by author 10-18-2006 03:38 PM
"the fact is he tries two to three new persons every month "


that's a lot,so in 15 years that means he molested 540 boys .
In 30 years that's 1080 boys.

So ,is it safe to say that at this point it's a common knowledge in India that sb is an abuser,due to such enormously high number of his victims?

Angelic, usedbybaba's statement was that he was "abused for 15 years". If he was abused for 15 years and the abuse did not start until he was nineteen and in college, that means he remained in the situation until he was approximately 34.

Not only that but I seriously doubt this bozo could ever get into Sai Baba's college. Like Joe said (and I was thinking the same thing) students from that institute are very smart and their english is excellent. Usedbybaba does NOT fit the profile of a student from that school.

lisa de bitch y dont u shut the fuck up u silly lallupanju whore

"lisa de bitch y dont u shut the fuck up u silly lallupanju whore"
ubb,
why are you using different username?
what's the point?

Sai Baba? What's the point? Why are you folks wasting your breath? He's already been proven as a fraudster, you people evidently have too much time on your hands. Get a life.

Edited by author 10-19-2006 11:43 AM
hey,Angel, if u think i did the "om sai" message sorry not me.

by the way is there any way i can retrive a message that i lost because my online connection got diconnected, Angel?
What i wrote was very satisfactory. you would have got a clear picture how this Avatar thing an God is used in India and now abroad. I wrote a full page,Maybe god does not want me to post it?? There was absolutely no abuse.I t was about me and my experience.

can you see the blank page below? that was my mail

Edited by author 10-19-2006 11:46 AM
I have recently updated my thread about Alaya Rahm's Failed & Self-Dismissed Lawsuit with the following information:

Furthermore, regarding Kreydick's sworn and video-taped deposition, Anti-Sai Activists have attempted to cast slurs on Kreydick's integrity and have accused him of being "prejudiced" in favor of Sathya Sai Baba. Ironically enough, in "Response To Form Interrogatories", it was none other than Alaya Rahm himself who cited Kreydick & Family as witnesses on his behalf!

Alaya Rahm claimed that Lewis Kreydick & Family were all aware of "incidents" relating to his alleged molestation and named them (on record) as people who:

1. Witnessed the INCIDENT or the event occurring immediately before or after the INCIDENT.
2. Made statements at the scene of the INCIDENT.
3. Heard statements made about the INCIDENT by any individual at the scene.
4. Had knowledge of the INCIDENT.

Needless to say, Kreydick's sworn and video-taped deposition wholly refuted all these points made by Alaya Rahm. The Society did not actively go out and attempt to discredit Alaya Rahm. Rather, they simply interviewed a witness named by Alaya Rahm himself and obtained a shocking and damaging deposition against him.

It is amusing that Anti-Sai Activists claim that Kreydick's testimony "could easily be contested by expert psychologists". Notably, in pretrial discovery, Alaya Rahm claimed that he had suffered no psychological trauma that would have required medical or psychiatric care. Furthermore, Alaya identified no psychologist who had ever examined him! So it does not appear that there were any "expert psychologists" who were prepared to support or defend Alaya's position.

As a matter of fact, Alaya Rahm never saw an "expert psychologist" and his parents never sent him to one. Rather, the only help that Alaya obtained was a 3 day seminar from the Landmark Forum on "Empowerment, self help and personal growth" that cost $795 in June 2005 (5 years after his alleged abuse and 5 months after he filed his lawsuit)! That's it.

Relevant Links:
- Alaya Rahm Self-Dismisses His Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society
- Scathing Response To Critics

re /m615
Now, "usedbybaba" is claiming he was not abused!

"There was absolutely no abuse.I t was about me and my experience."

Weird.

Edited by author 10-19-2006 12:14 PM
"by the way is there any way i can retrive a message that i lost because my online connection got diconnected, Angel?
What i wrote was very satisfactory. you would have got a clear picture how this Avatar thing an God is used in India and now abroad. I wrote a full page,Maybe ?? There was absolutely no abuse.I t was about me and my experience."
____________________________
but i thought you've experienced abuse?

what do you mean by ..."There was absolutely no abuse"

so you're saying you weren't abused,or there was no use of abusive language in the post?

God does not want you to post it??

so God wants you to post..."There was absolutely no abuse" cause that's what you just wrote!

what are you trying to say??

please post again.

I know you(joe 108) have a website on baba and that is your business and you have to protect it at all costs. You are making money but not making any sense.
Talking to you is like promoting your site.I am not here to do that and i would not be interested in such a Human?? being. One who makes money on other people's emotions is not normal.

"can you see the blank page below? that was my mail"

no i can't.