Edited by author 10-07-2006 01:29 AM

Sick pervert Gerald Moreno!

Nothing is free from his sexual perversions. First he spends an entire page talking about excrement, then he spends time talking about Sai Baba's genitals, then he talks about anuses and genitals, then he talks about covering himself with animal excrement, then he starts talking about bestiality (sex with animals), then he starts posting onto teen porn sites, then he starts projecting his own homosexual desires onto other people,...

And now this sick pervert thinks that I have incestuous homosexual feelings towards my own brother.

Nothing is free from the sick purview of this thoroughly despicable and sexually immoral pervert who cries when he thinks about the ocean.

Sick Pervert Moreno /m269

Re /m377:

"Now you are claiming that 'Narayana Baba' (a trance medium who is alleged to materialize stuff) is an authority on Shirdi Sai Baba because he says so! lol"

Read the quote properly, dumbloon. It is sourced from a challenge to behavioural sciences from Sai Baba by Satya Pal Ruhela and Duane Robinson (both well-known devotees). You're very fond of "investigative reports" aren't you, since we know you like to deceive people into thinking that Puttaparthi Sai baba has been "scientifically investigated" when he hasn't. :-)

Do I look like I care about this investigative report? :-) If you care to read the original source, you'd see that as recently as 1982 devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba, who manifested the same powers as Sathya Sai Baba stated that he (Shirdi) has not reincarnated. So tough luck. And we are not talking about the mechanics of reincarnation per se, dumbloon, just the fact that Puttaparthi Sai Baba is a big fat liar when he claimed to be Shirdi's reinc. :-)

"One will also notice that Sanjay could not provide any conclusive evidence to support his claims about dates, etc."

Is Joe Moreno dumb or something? I just stated that it's coming soon: /m372

In fact I just scanned the "conclusive evidence2 yesterday, lol. As if Moreno has any "conclusive evidence" to prove his points when all he has are the fairy-tales of Kasturi who took twelve years to write a book and couldn't even get his facts straight, lol.

"Yes, (according to Sanjay) Venkamma is an authority on Sathya Sai Baba. Her numerous statments about Baba's divinity, miracles and avatarhood must also be accepted with her statements that Baba was bit by a scorpion. You can't accept one story and reject the others."

Poor Morono still doesn't get it. I can do anything I want since I am dealing with a bunch of confirmed liars. :-) Raju is a lair and Venkamma is a liar too. Nobody can explain how they could have access to Shirdi paraphernalia in a village that was supposedly cut off from the outside world, lol.

Liar Morono EXPOSED! /m269

Sanjay, want to talk sleazy lies? You are the sleaziest liar of them all. Backed up with proof:

- Sanjay's Yahoo Photo Album Lies
- More Lies: Trying to Keep Up
- Did Dr. Naresh Bhatia Molest Females?
- Is Tony O'Clery Bisexual/Homosexual And A Molestor?
- Was Glen Meloy A "Disturbed Person"?
- Arnold Schulman And The Alleged "Serpentine Lie"
- The Aghori Vimalananda Lie
- Kishore Dadlani - Vicious Slanderer Extraordinaire
- Pious Pretenses
- Sanjay's Pseudo-Devotee Status
- The Meat Eating Vegetarian
- Stunning Tony O'Clery & Glen Meloy Update

And regarding your claim that I am wrong for "highlighting a 'contradiction' from when I was a devotee (prior to six years ago!)" holds no water because you promoted the fact that Baba's words were not accurately translated even as an Anti-Sai Activist. It is even posted on Anti-Sai Sites: Memories of a still thinking, not quite brainwashed, ex-devotee. As I said before, you are pathetic :-)

Sanjay Fully Exposed: /m272

Sanjay, want to talk incest? How about your incestuous homoeroticism for your own cousin? You are pathetic.

Sanjay Fully Exposed: /m272

And just for the record since 'Morono' keeps bringing it up, and especially for those readers who do not know much about Sathya Sai Baba in the first place, the subject of correct translations is academic.

As a devotee, I lamented that the discourses of Sai Baba were not properly translated. As a critic, it makes no difference to me because what is published works very well to prove my case, whereas what isn't published has been deleted from the records to hide Sai Baba's putrid lies. :-)

Secondly, it is open knowledge that everything published in Sai Baba's ashram meets with his approval for publication. Hear that? Every published discourse is approved. So if there is any inconsistency on Sai Baba's part due to faulty translations or whatever, it is Sai Baba who is to be held responsible since it was published under his approval.

Highlighting a "contradiction" from when I was a devotee (prior to six years ago!) will make no difference. Sai Baba is a loose-lipped liar, pure and simple. :-) Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies upon more sleazy lies. :-)

/m374

Too funny Sanjay! Now you are claiming that "Narayana Baba" (a trance medium who is alleged to materialize stuff) is an authority on Shirdi Sai Baba because he says so! lol

As I said before, these are the ridiculously low standards that Sanjay uses and abuses to promote his smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba.

One will also notice that Sanjay could not provide any conclusive evidence to support his claims about dates, etc. Yes, (according to Sanjay) Venkamma is an authority on Sathya Sai Baba. Her numerous statments about Baba's divinity, miracles and avatarhood must also be accepted with her statements that Baba was bit by a scorpion. You can't accept one story and reject the others.

Sanjay Fully Exposed: /m272

Hey Morono! Don't change the subject, you sly rascal! :-) We know how desperate you are to be relevant, don't we? ;-)

Sai Baba, your beloved guru, is an inbreed. Venkamma is an inbreed. Venkamma married her own uncle, her mother's brother, and had his children. Raju wanted fame. Raju wanted attention from the townspeople who thought he was a moronic child. Raju decided to proclaim himself as the reincarnation of a well-known saint. Raju is a liar. :-)

Also, regarding Sanjay's comment:

"Even after (Sathya) Sai Baba has been fully exposed has a liar through his own statements".

Sanjay admitted, even going back to the time he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba (extolling Baba as God based on "personal experience") that the translated words from Sathya Sai Baba were not accurate or literal translations. As a matter of fact, Sanjay said:

"Fine. I don't believe that. Why? Why because, I wouldn't know about his WRITINGS [translated (correctly?) from Telugu to English] but his DISCOURSES are most definitely not presented correctly. In fact, when I discovered this, it was the MAJOR reason why I disconnected myself from the Org. I cannot rely on anything which is published in Sanathana Sarathi, Sathya Sai Speaks, Summer Showers, etc as the ACTUAL word of Sai Baba. Another shocking statement. Cool huh? :)" (Reference)

As a matter of fact, I blogged about this on my article entitled Sanjay Dadlani and Brian Steel's Flip-Flopping .

Although Sanjay made his comment dating back to November of 2000, he currently dismisses his past statements and tries to argue that the English translations accurately reflect Sathya Sai Baba's words in Telugu. More flip-flopping from the wishy-washy and psychologically unstable Anti-Sai Activist, Sanjay Kishore Dadlani

Edited by author 10-07-2006 01:03 AM
As recently as 1982, a certain Narayana Baba of Hyderabad claimed that Shirdi Sai Baba had not reincarnated:

"He says the disembodied soul of his guru (that is, Sai Baba) talks to him. He sits before a framed photograph of the Sai Baba of Shirdi and looks at it for enlightenment... With the help of his guru's spirit, he is even able to materialise rings, lockets, and vibhuti [ash] from thin air. When asked how he produces these things he declares that the spirit of his departed guru gives them in his hands, so that when he opens his fists the object is there." - Ruhela, 'Sai Baba And His Message', p. 133-34.

:-)

Gerald 'Joe' Morono EXPOSED! /m269

Edited by author 10-07-2006 01:00 AM
Re /m371:

"If Venkamma was right about the scorpion incident, then she is also right about the numerous miracles and healings she also attributed to Sathya Sai Baba."

WRONG!

One of Venkamma's favourite stories is how she repeatedly begged Raju to provide her with a picture of Shirdi Sai Baba, since Raju was guffing all the time about Shirdi Baba and apparently no one knew anything about Shirdi Baba (ha ha ha, cough cough!).

Now why would Venkamma beg Raju for a Shirdi picture when they were freely available in Puttaparthi? What to speak of the fact that not one, but two of her own uncles were devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba way before Raju went off on his acid trip? :-) And, oh yeah, please do remember that Raju (and why not Venkamma too?) was attending Shirdi bhajans regularly in the house of a villager who had been personally trained by Narasimha Swamiji, and who got the picture of Shirdi Baba from him? :-)

Conclusion: Evidence suggests that Venkamma Raju was a party to Raju's increasing pile of lies upon lies.

'Morono' EXPOSED! /m269

Edited by author 10-07-2006 12:59 AM
Dear Dumbloon, :-)

A good question you ask, my little glasshoppa. :-)

The First Wave was about Puttaparthi Raju's terrible inbreeding.

The Second Wave was about Puttaparthi Raju's terrible Shirdi Lies.

The Third Wave is coming soon. :-) It'll explain everything. :-)

I've been giving the clues all along, but you are obviously too thick to work it out. :-) Why do you want me to answer your questions when, according to you, I am a "pathological liar"? :-) Dink! Caught out contradicting yourself again. :-) Do your own research, faggotface, and stop questioning mine. You are not in a position to question or criticise my findings because you do not have refuting information. All you have are the fairy-tales of Narayan Kasturi, who had a full twelve years to do his reseach and couldn't_even_get_one_basic_fact_right. Lol.

Gerald 'Joe' Moreno FULLY EXPOSED: /m269

Edited by author 10-07-2006 12:39 AM
The only person "full of lies" is the pathological liar, Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED").

Do tell us who got the dates right? Kasturi, LIMF or others? Why and how do you conclusively know? Funny how Sanjay keeps citing the words of devotees and relatives who fully accepted Baba's divinity. If Venkamma was right about the scorpion incident, then she is also right about the numerous miracles and healings she also attributed to Sathya Sai Baba.

Sanjay's new word "dumbloon". Kind of fits his last name well: Sanjay Dumblooni. lol

Sanjay Fully Exposed: /m272

Dear Dumbloons, :-)

one must also consider Puttaparthi Raju's public lie about not being bitten by a scorpion as he stated in a public discourse. How likely is this when a scorpion bite was the most likely cause in a town (Uravakonda) that was known for it's poisonous snakes and scorpions?

Titter ye not, for Raju was in the bathroom when he was bitten and himself said that he was bitten by a scorpion, according to his own sister Venkamma.

Is this important, to be bitten or not by a scorpion? Maybe, maybe not, but we all know that Puttaparthi Raju is full of lies, lies, and more lies. :-)

Dear Dumbloons, :-)

please remember that N. Kasturi, Puttaparthi Raju's authorised biographer, was personally charged with the task of investigating Raju's life details through interviews with Raju himself, his family, kinsmen, classmates, villages, and so on, with the full approval of Raju.

Kasturi was charged with this fantastic responsibility in July 1948, and the first part of Sathyam Sivam Sundaram was published in 1960. In the twelve years that it took to complete this project, Kasturi couldn't even get one fact right, namely that the declaration happened in 1943 and not 1940 as the biographies suggest. LOL!

Mind you, he didn't even get the date right either. Sai Baba was bitten by a scorpion on 8th March (1940) according to Kasturi, but he was actually bitten on the 4th March (1943) according to the facts. You may ask, and rightly so, what does it matter?

It matters because this is another example of Kasturi's poor research skills. Sai Baba was bitten by the scorpion on Sivaratri night of that year, which means Kasturi couldn't even be bothered to check the almanac and figure out which date was Sivaratri even if he did get the year wrong too! :-) Maybe he did if he thought it was 1940 but who cares, he is still wrong. :-)

Think about that, dumbloons. :-)

Re /m365:

"Like I said Sanjay, as usual you have NO idea what you are talking about. I'm not going to waste any more of my time on your idiocy. You've had almost four years of it and you are still just as dishonest and as blind as you were in the beginning."

No, you don't know what you are talking about. And since you continue to believe (obviously) that Sathya Sai is the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai in spite of all the evidence that has been made public, you are intellectually dishonest and blind, and no one is going to waste their time with your idiocy.

If you cannot even comprehend the fact that Sai Baba's own brother thought he was a liar, then nothing on earth can save you from the delusion that you are embroiled in. :-)

"When you can hold Krishna et al to the same standards you are trying to push on Sai Baba, then maybe someone will take you seriously. Until then you are just a hypocritical Krishna thumper."

Who spoke of Krishna? When did Krishna come into this? For your information, Krishna never claimed to be the reincarnation of anybody else. And even if he was, I can bet that he would make a damn better job of it than this pervert and charlatan liar Puttaparthi Raju boy. :-) He was so thick that he missed his one and only chance at fame by failing to impress Narasimha Swamiji and didn't even merit a mention in the latter's book! This is probably the first episode where Raju didn't know who had come to him, and after Raju pulled out his hair after realising what a major chance he missed, he resolved that he would cheat by getting his agents to immediately report any new arrivals coming to check him out, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. :-)

"if you are going to regulate religious claims then you must regulate ALL claims."

Get it into your head, this is not a board to regulate "all" claims. We are strictly concerned with discussing Puttaparthi Sai Baba here. Puttaparthi Sai Baba has just suffered possibly the biggest expose of his life since his whole empire rests on that one 1940, oops, 1943, claim to being Shirdi Sai Baba. Ha ha ha ha ha.

"Like I said, if you have claims of fraud put your money where your big mouth is and file a court case and quit whining on the internet. Fraud IS a legally actionable offense and VERY easy to prove in court so you are not fooling anyone but yourself. Grow up and get with the program bozo."

And how, precisely, are we meant to take this issue into court? It is extremely advantageous to Puttaparthi Sai Baba that Shirdi Sai Baba is no longer around to stand up in court and claim his own authenticity. Therefore Puttaparthi Raju can get away with saying anything like he thinks he has go away with so far! Alas no! We now know that two of Raju's own uncles were Shirdi devotees, not to mention that Raju himself was attending Shirdi bhajans in the houses of those who were personally trained in Shirdi worship by Narasimha Swamiji.

This is not an issue for me. This is an issue for you dumbloons. :-) nSai Baba is a liar, get used to it. Nothing can save him now. :-)

Ever thought why he has never visited Shirdi? :-) Even I've been to Shirdi, lol.

Edited by author 10-07-2006 12:05 AM
What a laughably pathetic defence of Sathya Sai Baba's documented lies about Shirdi Sai Baba! Ha ha ha ha ha ha, oh my!

Even after (Sathya) Sai Baba has been fully exposed has a liar through his own statements as well as the statements of his own contemporaries and other (devotee) researchers, these pathetic rottweilers still manage to find a way to poorly spin this to their own "benefit" and try to blame or castigate former devotees for their use of devotional material to prove said lies! :-) Who asked for Moreno's opinion or evaluation anyway? Moreno is incapable of coming up with any refutation on this issue and has been rendered impotent.

ROFL!

Please try again, as computer games often say. :-)

Oh and by the way, Mowweno, new evidence is coming that will completely blow apart your equally pathetic 'Brian Steel' argument, LOL! Well, to be fair, it's not exactly "new", but I have just recently discovered it and will fully employ it in my ongoing investigations into Sai Baba's fraudulence, lol.

Tough luck, Sai Baba is fully exposed as a liar! His claims to being Shirdi Sai Baba is very suspicious and his whole empire is set to crumble, given that it is all based on that one Shirdi declaration. Apologists like Gerald/Joe108 cannot construct a sensible, rational and logical argument to save their lives, which is why they always resort to irrelevant ad-hominem attacks on former devotees. They cannot explain how Sai Baba could publicly declare that no on in Puttaparthi knew about Shirdi Sai Baba, when they all did! So tough luck, stand back and watch the empire crumble into dust. :-)