Re /m365:

"Like I said Sanjay, as usual you have NO idea what you are talking about. I'm not going to waste any more of my time on your idiocy. You've had almost four years of it and you are still just as dishonest and as blind as you were in the beginning."

No, you don't know what you are talking about. And since you continue to believe (obviously) that Sathya Sai is the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai in spite of all the evidence that has been made public, you are intellectually dishonest and blind, and no one is going to waste their time with your idiocy.

If you cannot even comprehend the fact that Sai Baba's own brother thought he was a liar, then nothing on earth can save you from the delusion that you are embroiled in. :-)

"When you can hold Krishna et al to the same standards you are trying to push on Sai Baba, then maybe someone will take you seriously. Until then you are just a hypocritical Krishna thumper."

Who spoke of Krishna? When did Krishna come into this? For your information, Krishna never claimed to be the reincarnation of anybody else. And even if he was, I can bet that he would make a damn better job of it than this pervert and charlatan liar Puttaparthi Raju boy. :-) He was so thick that he missed his one and only chance at fame by failing to impress Narasimha Swamiji and didn't even merit a mention in the latter's book! This is probably the first episode where Raju didn't know who had come to him, and after Raju pulled out his hair after realising what a major chance he missed, he resolved that he would cheat by getting his agents to immediately report any new arrivals coming to check him out, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. :-)

"if you are going to regulate religious claims then you must regulate ALL claims."

Get it into your head, this is not a board to regulate "all" claims. We are strictly concerned with discussing Puttaparthi Sai Baba here. Puttaparthi Sai Baba has just suffered possibly the biggest expose of his life since his whole empire rests on that one 1940, oops, 1943, claim to being Shirdi Sai Baba. Ha ha ha ha ha.

"Like I said, if you have claims of fraud put your money where your big mouth is and file a court case and quit whining on the internet. Fraud IS a legally actionable offense and VERY easy to prove in court so you are not fooling anyone but yourself. Grow up and get with the program bozo."

And how, precisely, are we meant to take this issue into court? It is extremely advantageous to Puttaparthi Sai Baba that Shirdi Sai Baba is no longer around to stand up in court and claim his own authenticity. Therefore Puttaparthi Raju can get away with saying anything like he thinks he has go away with so far! Alas no! We now know that two of Raju's own uncles were Shirdi devotees, not to mention that Raju himself was attending Shirdi bhajans in the houses of those who were personally trained in Shirdi worship by Narasimha Swamiji.

This is not an issue for me. This is an issue for you dumbloons. :-) nSai Baba is a liar, get used to it. Nothing can save him now. :-)

Ever thought why he has never visited Shirdi? :-) Even I've been to Shirdi, lol.

Edited by author 10-07-2006 12:05 AM
What a laughably pathetic defence of Sathya Sai Baba's documented lies about Shirdi Sai Baba! Ha ha ha ha ha ha, oh my!

Even after (Sathya) Sai Baba has been fully exposed has a liar through his own statements as well as the statements of his own contemporaries and other (devotee) researchers, these pathetic rottweilers still manage to find a way to poorly spin this to their own "benefit" and try to blame or castigate former devotees for their use of devotional material to prove said lies! :-) Who asked for Moreno's opinion or evaluation anyway? Moreno is incapable of coming up with any refutation on this issue and has been rendered impotent.

ROFL!

Please try again, as computer games often say. :-)

Oh and by the way, Mowweno, new evidence is coming that will completely blow apart your equally pathetic 'Brian Steel' argument, LOL! Well, to be fair, it's not exactly "new", but I have just recently discovered it and will fully employ it in my ongoing investigations into Sai Baba's fraudulence, lol.

Tough luck, Sai Baba is fully exposed as a liar! His claims to being Shirdi Sai Baba is very suspicious and his whole empire is set to crumble, given that it is all based on that one Shirdi declaration. Apologists like Gerald/Joe108 cannot construct a sensible, rational and logical argument to save their lives, which is why they always resort to irrelevant ad-hominem attacks on former devotees. They cannot explain how Sai Baba could publicly declare that no on in Puttaparthi knew about Shirdi Sai Baba, when they all did! So tough luck, stand back and watch the empire crumble into dust. :-)

Edited by author 10-06-2006 02:26 AM
For other readers on this board, here is "my take" about all this talk regarding Shirdi Sai Baba, Sathya Sai Baba and other related issues. My observation is one that I have not seen voiced before, so I will voice it now.

Anti-Sai Activists, including Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED"), ceaselessly and unremittingly accuse Sai devotees of being: cult members, brainwashed, unreliable, idiotic, dishonest, deceitful, subjective, inaccurate, biased, minions, ignorant, repressed, prejudiced, projectors, exaggerators, escapists, weak in intellect, easily influenced, highly impressionable, in self-denial, irrational, illogical, embellishers, in turmoil, misguided, cultish, one's who lack common sense, one's having personality problems, one's who hallucinate, one's who possess neuroses and psychoses, one's who lack self-confidence, etc. (the list or slurs and aspersions goes on and on).

After making all these accusations against the integrity and credibility of devotees, Anti-Sai Activists then make their case against Sathya Sai Baba by citing the words of and comments and books written by DEVOTEES!

Anti-Sai Activists are a bunch of flip-floppers who are incapable of making a consistent and sober argument against Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This is also evidenced in the article I wrote about Brian Steel in which he prattled against the integrity and accuracy of English discourse translations, yet then cited these same inaccurate English discourse translations as accurate and factual references against Sri Sathya Sai Baba!

Fully exposed perverts, deviants and pathological liars like "Sai Baba EXPOSED" (aka Sanjay Kishore Dadlani) fail to understand that they fully compromise their own arguments and positions against Baba. If we are to believe Anti-Sai Activists, then we must believe that Sai Devotees are honest, truthful, accurate, factual and objective. Why cite their books, words or publications otherwise?

Sanjay Exposed: /m272

Edited by author 11-01-2006 10:34 PM
Like I said Sanjay, as usual you have NO idea what you are talking about. I'm not going to waste any more of my time on your idiocy. You've had almost four years of it and you are still just as dishonest and as blind as you were in the beginning. When you can hold Krishna et al to the same standards you are trying to push on Sai Baba, then maybe someone will take you seriously. Until then you are just a hypocritical Krishna thumper. If you are going to regulate religious claims then you must regulate ALL claims. You know this will never happened because the nature of religion is such that it is not possible nor wise. Like I said, if you have claims of fraud put your money where your big mouth is and file a court case and quit whining on the internet. Fraud IS a legally actionable offense and VERY easy to prove in court so you are not fooling anyone but yourself. Grow up and get with the program bozo.

Edited by author 10-06-2006 01:45 AM
In the "official biography", there is a story about how Venkamma, Raju's sister, was fascinated with all the talk of Shirdi Baba after Raju's proclamation, and begged Raju to get her a picture of the Shirdi Baba. The biography then states (in a long-winded way) that Raju procured a picture for her by miraculous means.

Why the need for miracles, when Shirdi Baba photos were freely available in Puttaparthi? When Raju himself was worshipping one, and keeping it in his shirt pocket? When a villager was personally trained in Shirdi worship by Narasimha Swamiji and had prcured pictures of the Baba from him?

These questions and many others cannot be answered by faggotfaces like Gerald Moreno, who can only repeat himself and drool on endlessly contradicting himself about Krishna, fake miracles, sexual abuse, and so on. Pity.

Get it through your thick head, it is OVER!

EXPOSED! /m269 :-)

Goodnight. :-)

Gerald, why are you refusing to address the fact that you are an apologist for homosexual paedophilia, murders, drug-running, financial scandals, false miracles, ad infinitum? Funny enough, the incidents you cite as doubtful are fully supported by your beloved guru as genuine.

Even hilarious than that, your homosexual guru has just been exposed in public for possibly his biggest lie ever (Shirdi), yet you don't even have the guts to accept it? Tsk tsk tsk, because you know you'll shoot yourself in the feet. :-)

I've told you before, don't talk to me unless you have something worthwhile to respond to instead of talking about homosexuality and your own homosexual inclinations, sausage boy.

Mo-wenno, your beloved guru is such a small gnat that he didn't even merit a mention in Narasimha Swami's book, how does that make you feel? Burning with rage? :-)

Remember, Sai Baba had supposedly declared his 'fullness' on 20th October 1940 (oops, 1943!) and was openly behaving like the avatar he proclaimed himself to be. Still Narasimha Swami was not impressed and only discussed a Karur boy and a Bangalore girl. Oh dear, he missed his one and only chance of fame in Shirdi circles and blew it. :-)

Now go away, sausage boy, and come back when you have something worthy of my attention. You have the attention span of an ant, and I am not amused by your childish behaviour.

Sanjay, why are you refusing to address the fact that you are a miracle-monger who believes, accepts and promotes belief in miracles? Funny enough, the miracles you promote cannot be proven or examined because they allegedly occurred 5,000 to several hundred-million years ago. lol

Nice term there "faggotface".

Coincidentally, I updated my blog about your Incestuous Homoeroticism and your Homosexualization Of Everything I Say. Everytime you open your big mouth, you confirm this basic truth that you are obsessed with homosexuals and homosexuality.

Been feeling "Evlisssy" recently? lol

There is no rationalizing with a self-professed drunk, a psychopath and a person who fantasizes about slicing his flesh with razors and licking the barrel of a gun before blowing his brains out (Reference With Pictures). Go bark up some other tree :-)

Updated: Full Exposure: See /m272

Gerald Moreno stupidly argues for the authenticity of Sai Baba's miracles. Why is Krishna exempt from this if he is also God, and especially if Sai Baba claims to be the selfsame Krishna too? LOL!

EXPOSED! /m269 :-)

Excuse me, but can someone explain to me how Puttaparthi could be ignorant of Shirdi Sai Baba, and everyone was surprised to hear Sathyanarayana Raju declare his previous avatar "out of the blue", when two of his uncles were devotees way before he declared anything?

No wonder he was initially treated with scorn, they thought he had lost his marbles!

[Pssst! He had. :-)]

Edited by author 10-06-2006 01:13 AM
What kind of drugs is Joe Moreno on? Of course it matters what Sathya Sai Baba says about these "alleged" miracles, since Moreno brought it up. It only goes to show that when Moreno argues along these lines, it is extremely weak and he shoots himself in both feet.

And I don't need to say it again but I will, just for fun :-), that this forum is meant to discuss Sathya Sai Baba and not me, so keep on attacking me all you like, you only continue to prove your irrelevance here. Sai Baba's biggest works of authorship are Ramakatha Rasavahini and Bhagavatha Vahini which, surprise surprise, is packed full of "fanciful" miracle stories relating to the lives of Rama and Krishna. Gerald Moreno ("Joe108") tears out his hair and gnashes his teeth at this fact, because it conflicts with the "rational" and "logical" stance which he is pretending to take.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha, talk about shooting yourself in both feet! He argues against Krishna, whereas his guru Sai Baba loves Krishna and authenticates everything. LOL!

Notice how Gerald Moreno tried to publicly deceive people into thinking that Sathya Sai Baba's miracles were "thoroughly investigated" by Haraldsson when they were not. His requests for experimentation were denied by the Baba himself, so anything he wrote was purely observational and based on devotee testimonies, that are biased. Tough luck. Sai Baba is a fantastic liar, he has been lying about his Shirdi avatarhood since 1940. Oops, sorry, I mean 1943. LOL.

Moreno Exposed: /m269

:-)

Discuss Sai Baba here, faggotface, and stop obsessing over me.

Sanjay, it is your opinion that Sathya Sai Baba is a fraud, so it does not matter what SSB said about these alleged miracles. The fact remains that you are a Hare Krishna Congregational Member who solicits the authenticity and incontestability of alleged miracles attributed to Lord Krishna. Far be it for a miracle-monger such as yourself to be attempting to deceive others with the facade that you are skeptical and rational when you are neither :-)

Blog Exposing Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED")

Full Exposure: See /m272

So do any of the braindead nitwits here have a clue why 1943 became 1940 in the "official biographies"?

Shall I give a clue?

No, I won't. :-)

Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") fully exposed:

See /m272

There is absolutely no proof that Lord Krishna performed any miracles or manifested any powers :-)

Sanjay fully believes in Sri Krishna's alleged miracles and powers and even preaches that they are genuine and actually occurred. For example, Sanjay believes that Lord Krishna literally manifested 16,000 separate, physical bodies, married 16,000 separate women and copulated with each and every single one of them and begat many children. Sanjay is hardly the one to be taking a skeptical or critical stance when he believes in these things himself. Lump that :-)

Blog Exposing Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED")

Edited by author 10-05-2006 10:30 PM
Re /m349:

"The only thing that is devastating Sanjay is how you keep babbling incoherently thinking you actually know what you are talking about or are making sense."

I know full well what I am talking about. :-) Sai Baba the Liar lied to the media (as well as countless other people) that he was the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai Baba, and that his knowledge about it when no one else knew is proof of the fact. Not to mention that his whole facade is hinged on that declaration. We now know that this is a complete lie.

How could Sai Baba be bitten by a scorpion in 1940 and then declare himself as (Shirdi) Sai Baba a couple of months later, when he was attending school and worshipping a small picture of Shirdi Baba in 1941? How could no one in Puttaparthi know anything about Shirdi Sai Baba, when two of Raju's (Sathya Sai's) uncles were open devotees of Shirdi Baba, not to mention that Raju himself regularly attended Shirdi bhajans? Even when the host of these bhajans was personally trained by Narasimha Swamiji? Even his own classmates testify that he used to worship Shirdi Sai Baba, so how couldn't anyone know who he was?

Raju was such a small fry that he didn't even merit a place in Narasimha Swamiji's four-volume Shirdi epic, especially in the section where possible reincarnations are discussed. On the contrary, Narasimha Swamiji specifically discussed just two people, a boy from Karur and a girl from Bangalore, whom he personally exposed as frauds. Raju did not even make a mention, despite the book being first published well over a decade after their supposed meeting (Narasimha and Raju's). There is only a vague hint about materialisations that could have referred to anybody. :-)

I know full well what I am talking about, whereas unquestioning devotees satisfy themselves with Kasturi's poorly-researched fairy stories that are self-contradictory. And there is much more to come. :-)