QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
$39 July special! Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro
Topic: Sathya Sai Baba 2005: Who Is He?
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 343-358  327-342 of 2980  311-326 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom    (not accepting new messages)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  342
10-01-2006 02:00 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 02:09 AM
Re /m339:

Trust Gerald Moreno to continue drooling like a rabid ignoramus. I may not have the book but I have read it, dork. LOL, "unreal". :-) Notice how Moreno pounce son me every time I say something, perverted little homosexual obsessive stalker. Chee!

Tough luck, Sai Baba has just suffered the biggest expose of his life. His entire empire is based on his declaration to be Shirdi Sai, and now that whole empire comes crumbling down. He is a liar, pure and simple. :-)

Oh, and I hope you all noticed the irony of the postings; Since Sathya Sai Baba is an equally stupid fellow who contradicts himself all the time, he has given two dates for the birth of Shirdi Sai Baba, which is quite presumptuous since no one knows Shirdi's birthdate. The two dates are Sept 27 1838 and Sep 28 1835. So my articles were split between Sep 27 and 28. :-)

Parthi Baba's boo-boo on Shirdi Baba. :-)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  341
10-01-2006 01:54 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 07:08 AM
Beast Master,
Even Uri Geller was tested by people in the U.S. intelligence communty and you bozos are still calling him a fake. And I don't see you demanding that Christian or any other miracles be evaluated in the same way! If you demand one YOU MUST demand all or you reveal yourself to be nothing but a hypocrite and/or racist.
Why are you picking on just Sai Baba? I know you won't answer me because you know I've got your number. You want Baba to do this and that to prove his powers but you are not really smart enough to even know how to set the parameters for such demands. You can't even post your name online honestly for God's sake yet you have all kinds of demands for others! Pathetic.

And another thing...when are you going to hold the anti-Sais to the same standards of PROOF you are trying to hold Sai Baba to?
Without legal standards of PROOF you are ALREADY assuming Baba is guilty. This is why I cannot take people like you seriously. You live by one set of rules for yourself and another for everyone else. You want proof and when it is given you ignore it. Then, when you are asked for proof you supply NONE and pretend the laws don't apply to you. And then you wonder why people like me are totally exasperated with your hypocrisy.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  340
10-01-2006 01:44 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 05:21 AM
CO2000 is NOT joe, usedbybaba! CO2000=conscientiousobjector2000 abbreviated. Seems to me you are the one wasting everyone's time with your continuous mind games usedbybaba. You guys have had YEARS to prove your case and all you do is play mind games and lie! You haven't responded to ANY of my points honestly. You have evaded, hid behind other usernames, like blldexter, to make it look like there are more of you than there are, etc.. It's obvious this is all a big game to you. You are nothing but a sick sadist who likes to torture people with your idiotic mind games. You won't get away with it.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  339
10-01-2006 01:40 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 01:42 AM
Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") has been fully exposed as a fraud, a sham, a conman and a pathological liar with proof. See /m272 for a full list

It is also amusing that Sanjay is claiming he read Haraldsson's book when he does not even have it! As a matter of fact, it is still listed on his froogle wish-list where he is begging for books on Sathya Sai Baba. See for yourself: Reference. Why would Sanjay be begging for Haraldsson's book if he has already had access to it?

Sanjay is such a pathetic liar, it is unreal!

Exposing Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED")

New blog articles starting tomorrow :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  338
10-01-2006 01:38 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 01:54 AM
Oh and by the way, to get away from the craziness of the braindead zombies (Sai Baba devotees/defenders) and since there is obviously no moderator here (which is why they can get away with their foolishness) feel free to join a new QuickTopic forum opened just now:

Sai Baba EXPOSED!

The rules are very simple: Discussion is about Sai Baba, and no ad-hominem attacks on other posters will be tolerated. Devotees etc. are welcome of course, providing that they follow the rules.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!  337
10-01-2006 01:09 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 01:10 AM
I'm awfully sorry to interrupt the scintillating(!) level of discussion here, but Sai Baba has just been fully exposed as a fraud, a sham, a conman and a liar.

--------------------------------

A Full Exposure of Sathya Sai Baba's claims to be the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai Baba (d. 1918). Complete re-evaluation of the facts in the light of new evidence that blows apart unquestioned and accepted histories in the hagiographic milieu of Puttaparthi.


Sai Baba's Shirdi LIES - | Introduction | Kasturi's storytelling | Shirdi Sai Baba unknown in Puttaparthi | Sathya Sai Baba interviewed declaring his identity with Shirdi Sai |


Sai Baba's Shirdi LIES 2 - | Sathyanarayana Raju worshipping Shirdi Sai in 1941 | Raju attending Shirdi Sai bhajan sessions | Puttaparthi villagers "trained" under Narasimha Swamiji | Raju's two uncles openly worshipping Shirdi Baba | Classmates testify Raju's worship of Shirdi Baba | A strong culture of Shirdi worship in Puttaparthi |


Sai Baba's Shirdi LIES 3 - | Raju bitten by a scorpion in 1940 | A turning-point in Raju's life | Sathya Sai Baba denies scorpion bite | Raju's sister confirms scorpion bite in 1943 | Raju's suffering and epileptic seizures | Raju taken for exorcisms | Raju affirms he is under Sai Baba's protection |


Sai Baba's Shirdi LIES 4 - | Raju's brother muses on Shirdi Sai possession | Ra. Ganapati muses further on possession | H.S. Dixit on Shirdi Sai's return after 8 years (or not) | Sathya Sai claims Dixit misreportage | Ganapati musing unacceptable due to self-serving convenience | Sathya Sai devotees' ignorance of Shirdi culture and practice | January 2006 punitive legal action |


Sai Baba's Shirdi LIES 5 - | Shocking discovery of Shirdi name misused | Raju's brother & sister claim Narasimha Swami visit | Brief description of Narasimha Swami's activities | Narayana Baba says Shirdi Baba not reincarnated | Brief recap of last four articles | Sathya Sai's empire foundations to crumble | Narasimha Swami on Shirdi succession | Narasimha Swami indicates Raju not a reincarnation | Narasimha Swami discusses Dixit's 8-year claim | Narasimha Swami regards posthumous Shirdi miracles as evidence of Shirdi Sai's ever-living presence | Narasimha Swami concludes no successor for Shirdi Sai Baba |

Copyright © Sai Baba EXPOSED! 2005-2006.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!  336
10-01-2006 12:58 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-01-2006 12:58 AM
It may be a coincidence, but I was just about to say the exact same thing. Since Sai Baba has never submitted himself to a serious scientific investigation, despite being challenged to do so (by Narasimhaiah) and requested by Haraldsson, any "scientific" investigation by Haraldsson is of no value.

Don't get me wrong, it's a great book. I've read it. But those of us who have been trained to carry out and perform scientific investigations will know that Haraldsson's work is not a scientific investigation of any kind. It is merely an empirical report based on his own observations, which he had no choice to do anyway since Sai Baba refused his requests for an investigative experiment.

One can muse that Sai Baba repeatedly refuses to submit himself to experiments is because he is scared that all of his simpleton tricks will be exposed. It has already been established that simple street magicians can replicate every miracle than Sai Baba can "do", including the Lingodbhavam, so Sai Baba is nothing special.
Beast Master  335
09-30-2006 11:08 PM ET (US)
re /m271 .

Awareness, consciousness breed spirituality
Ignorance, confusion breed superstition
- Beast Master, 2006

Joe108,

The reference to Erlendur Haraldsson's work has no value here since his goal was to record the paranormal experiences but not to investigate credibility, phenomena or the meaning of ash falling off picture frames.

You seem to be betting on lack of explanation. Sai devotees should get these mysteries investigated by independant third party teams to avoid Sai movement ending up into superstition. In such case guess what happens in the 8 years period from the time of SSB passing away and Prem Sai coming into being. How can you stop fake devotees manipulate these events to confuse the genuine devotees?

Sai devotees should deploy an independant third party expert committee to investigate the following aspects;

- Credibility: is it really happening or is the devotee, suffering from a psychological disorder manipulating?

- Phenomenon: How is the holy ash which is made of cow dung is reaching the picture frames? How is honey which is nectar from the flowers collected and processed by bees is oozing from the glass plate of the pictures? How about finger prints? Who are they matching to?

- Theological implication: Is it a good sign or a bad one? Is God or Satan sending a message? Or is it aliens? How is it linked to SSB? What does it indicate if the same is happening to Ammachi or some other Avatars?

There are no investigative reports published on Voodoo magic as well. Again, there is as much confusion exist on this mystery just as that on Voodoo magic.

- Beast Master
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  334
09-30-2006 09:04 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-30-2006 09:09 PM
Something, funny I've noticed.

I quoted Edna Mode from "The Incredibles" in my response to lenin999 in a thread where we discuss credibility.

i watched the movie in a multiplex years ago and bought a DVD recently.
I think Edna Mode is a hilarious character.

I didn't think about the title of the movie while posting and quoting Edna( "words are useless. Gobble, gobble, gobble. There is too much of it, darling. Too much") i just remembered that sentance ...but like i said i wasn't even aware of the meaning of the movie title,not until after i saw my response appear and there it was ,above lenin999/blldexter 's post ,the title "The IncrediblEs"
and i thought to myself,wow,what a coincidence!!!

incredible

adjective

Not plausible or believable: flimsy, implausible, improbable, inconceivable, shaky, thin, unbelievable, unconceivable, unconvincing, unsubstantial, weak. See likely/unlikely.
Not to be believed: inconceivable, unbelievable, unimaginable, unthinkable.

BWAHAHAH
Angel  333
09-30-2006 03:06 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-30-2006 03:06 PM
Lenin999
Do you now understand why you don't appear to be credible?
If you're bored stop with perversions and watch the Incredibles.
Angel  332
09-30-2006 03:00 PM ET (US)
"Finally the truth comes out about joe 108.He is using my name and
 
Not only is he using multiple names, he also attempted to use my
name "blldexter" (notice the poor spelling and grammar?). My name
is registered .Look how low he can stoop. ho that is his job as directed by baba"

"blldexter", your name is not registered, Joe's name is,You don't make sense as usual.
Lisa  331
09-30-2006 02:59 PM ET (US)
ermmmm, nope, it's a post you(joe 108) posted and deleted.I saw it.
Why are you lying?this is no big deal,why do you need to lie about something so insignificant.
Lying is generally a bad thing to do!
Angel  330
09-30-2006 02:58 PM ET (US)
"ask Krishna .... There is too much of it, darling. Too much.
My god you calim to be a man and you call Lenin as darling TOOOOOO MUCH."

I quoted Edna from The Incredibles.I watched a DVD recently and I'm still under influence.

BTW,why do you speak of yourself in a 3rd person.
it's a Total and a complete mess.
blldexter  329
09-30-2006 02:57 PM ET (US)
Finally the truth comes out about joe 108.He is using my name and
 
Not only is he using multiple names, he also attempted to use my
name "blldexter" (notice the poor spelling and grammar?). My name
is registered .Look how low he can stoop. ho that is his job as directed by baba
SATHYA  328
09-30-2006 02:52 PM ET (US)
"ask Krishna .... There is too much of it, darling. Too much.
My god you calim to be a man and you call Lenin as darling TOOOOOO MUCH.
Angel  327
09-30-2006 02:50 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 09-30-2006 02:52 PM
"Here is the post that JOE 108
made under the name "blldexter" that he
deleted:"

ermmmm, nope, it's a post you(lenin999/abused.../"blldexter") posted and deleted.I saw it.
Why are you lying?this is no big deal,why do you need to lie about something so insignificant.
Lying is generally a bad thing to do!
Bad boy!
RSS link What's this?
   << 343-358  327-342 of 2980  311-326 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2006 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.